Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KANDILYABR

Channel

KANDILYABR

@kandilyabr14

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

496subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001608697551
TypeChannel
Username@kandilyabr14
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kandilyabr14

Growth

493496494.56 August 2026 — 493 subscribers6 August 2026 — 493 subscribers14 August 2026 — 496 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 493–496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:55496+3
6 Aug 2026, 18:47493no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:52493first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 496 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held5 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total514
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆2040.0%
1632.0%
💘714.0%
❤‍🔥510.0%
😍24.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC92 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всем доброй!❤️ Одна из приятных новостей - осенью будет маркет, где я буду принимать участие.🍁 JUICY PLANT - дружественный проект.🪴 Ближе к мероприятию расскажу все подробности.*

7🏆3❤‍🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC66 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @juicy_plantPhoto

ВЛАДИМИР KANDILYABR 10 лет как изучаю и развиваю культуру чая на Дальнем Востоке. Специализируюсь на китайском виде чая - пуэр. Его насобирал больше всего видов в своей коллекции. Также изучаю чай с близлежащих стран: Тайланд, Тайвань, Лаос, Вьетнам. Заварю и расскажу -> дам почувствовать, что качественный чай это вкусно и интересно!

🏆7😍2💘1

3 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC105 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Красный чай из Хуа Чжу Лян Цзы!❤️ еще одна новинка моей линейки красных: весенний сбор, 2025 года, шайхун (финальная фиксация произведена засчет солнечного света) чай: яркий, объемный, танинный, сочный лесные ягоды (малина, ежевика), шиповник, лимон, вишня прогревающий, тонизирующий, включающий Ощущения такие, будто кто-то включил грелку в машине. Не самый подходящий красный под сегодняшнюю погоду, но стоит подожд

5🏆3💘2

31 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC126 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

еще один представитель фениксовых улунов!🔥 Я Ши Сян / Инь Хуа Сян - это известный гуандунский улун, с первичным названием Я Ши Сян - Аромат Утиного Помета.🦆, хотя его официальное название на данный момент Инь Хуа Сян - Аромат Жимолости.🫐 чай: яркий, цветочный, сочный, живой с ягодной кислинкой, овощными нотами на втором плане мощный, дающий в "голову", плавно опьяняющий Вообще прям попадание в сердечко для вас.💘 Т

4🏆3💘2

30 Jul 2026, 05:30 UTC125 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Аромат Грейпфрута!🌺 ФХДЦ Ю ХУА СЯН хотя тут помимо грейпфрута, пряно-цветочный, нежно-ореховый, корично-сладкий - уйма вкуснейших комбинаций. Вообще надо отметить, что это один из самых ярких, ароматных и вкусных Дан Цунов (гуандунских улунов) которые мне удавалось испить. - держит уверенные 7-8 проливов, и если надо, можно дожимать его до вкуса и цвета воды - эйфоричный, тонизирующий. буду странным если не упомяну

🏆4❤‍🔥3💘2

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kandilyabr14. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 338,748 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KANDILYABR” (@kandilyabr14), 496 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kandilyabr14.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.