Channel
@kanal_feyaturetskogo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,163subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001235024271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kanal_feyaturetskogo |
| Created | 12 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kanal_feyaturetskogo |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 7,163 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 7,170 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 7,165 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 7,172 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:28 | 7,174 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 7,181 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 7,178 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 7,184 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 7,186 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 7,181 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 7,191 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 7,192 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 7,192 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 41 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
625 reactions across 38 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 341 | 54.6% | |
| 🔥 | 147 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 120 | 19.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 1.92% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.64% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 625 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ПРЯМОЙ ЭФИР ЧЕРЕЗ 10 МИНУТ Турецкий — логичный и довольно системный язык. Он читается почти так, как пишется, у существительных нет рода, а слова строятся из понятных частей по определенным правилам. То, что сначала выглядит пугающе, после знакомства с системой оказывается гораздо проще, чем кажется. На эфире разберем 3 главных мифа, из-за которых турецкий кажется сложным, и поговорим о том, с чего действительно с…
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤7
Video message, posted without a caption
Кому подойдет самостоятельное изучение турецкого, а кому — нет На эфире честно поговорим: — почему заниматься самому - это осознанный выбор взрослого человека, а не компромисс — кому самостоятельный формат реально подходит, а кому - честно нет — что берет на себя структура и материалы, а что остается на вас — как понять, ваш это путь или вам нужен другой формат Без волшебных таблеток и обещаний быстрого результата.…
❤2
Запись эфира 🗣Турецкий от А1 до В2: что реально значат уровни турецкого и сколько до каждого из них идти от 18.08.2026
❤9🔥5
💟💟💟💟 РАСПРОДАЖА КУРСОВ ТУРЕЦКОГО С 18 по 23 августа включительно у нас проходит большая распродажа — скидки до -50% на курсы с самостоятельным прохождением. ➡️ Вы получаете полноценные обучающие программы от дипломированных туркологов: видеоуроки, рабочие тетради, задания, тесты и дополнительные материалы — и проходите их в своем темпе, без привязки к расписанию. ➡️ Можно начать с нуля, закрыть пробелы в граммати…
🔥3❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4
Друзья, уже через 10 минут встречаемся на прямом эфире: Турецкий от А1 до B2. Когда нет понятного представления о конечной цели, легко либо недооценить свой прогресс, либо решить, что до хорошего уровня еще учиться бесконечно. На эфире разберем: — что на самом деле умеет человек на каждом уровне — от A1 до B2, на живых примерах — сколько времени занимает переход с уровня на уровень — в часах, а не в абстрактных «го…
🔥6
Привет! Желаем вам хорошей недели — продуктивной, но без гонки и стресса. Пусть на этой неделе найдется время и для турецкого, и для всего остального, что вы запланировали❤️ А мы вам в этом поможем, ведь у нас как раз будет очень насыщенная неделя: впереди сразу три эфира о самостоятельном изучении турецкого. 🔴 Турецкий от A1 до B2: что реально значат уровни и сколько до каждого идти 18 августа 15:00 (МСК) Как пон…
❤🔥12❤10👍6
🌹 Мастер-класс «Во имя розы» 22 августа · Москва · 17.00 - 20.00 Один вечер, посвященный цветку, который для турок никогда не был просто цветком. Роза у османов - это символ Пророка, цветок в руке султанов, аромат, за которым и сегодня охотятся Chanel и Dior. За этой розой стоит целый культурный пласт: вера, красота, власть, поэзия. Мы разберем этот пласт, а потом проживем его руками и обонянием. Что будет на вст…
❤8👍3
Привет! ✨ В турецком есть слова, которые отличаются буквально одной буквой или звуком, но означают совершенно разные вещи. Собрали несколько пар слов, которые можно легко перепутать. Сохраняйте подборку⬇️ 📌erkek мальчик ekmek хлеб 📌 Selam! Привет! salam колбаса 📌kar снег kâr прибыль 📌 öldüm я умер(ла) oldum я стал(а) - как, например, в Memnun oldum 📌kustum меня вырвало/стошнило küstüm я обиделся/обиделась ➖➖➖ …
👍19❤3
📹 Память уже не та: почему это миф Запись эфира от 13 августа 2026 ➖➖➖ Также советуем вам посмотреть и другой наш эфир на тему, которая интересует многих⬇️ 📹 Сколько на самом деле нужно, чтобы заговорить по-турецки
🔥11❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @kanal_feyaturetskogo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kanal_feyaturetskogo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
1. Ben ________ ________ çıkıyorum.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2. Torunum ______ ______ oyun oynuyor.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3. Ben ____ ___ gidiyorum.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фея турецкого. Онлайн-школа турецкого языка Евгении Ларионовой” (@kanal_feyaturetskogo), 7,163 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanal_feyaturetskogo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.