Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᴋᴀʍyrᴀ …🐇

@kamyra_d

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

128subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001921087533
TypeChannel
Username@kamyra_d
Descriptionкамура (не камыра)!! арт статус: комишки 50/50 трейды 50/50 колабы - скорее нет
Created7 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/kamyra_d

Growth

127128127.57 Aug 2026, 19:52 — 127 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:45 — 128 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 128 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:529 Aug 2026, 01:46
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:46128no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:45128+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:52127first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.5%
avg views ÷ 128 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.7
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,578
Reactions total241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
598
Videos
2
Links
25

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53078412042583765706326.1%
custom 52832121695659977425121.2%
custom 5433982465301582974239.54%
239.54%
custom 5282952783606090654187.47%
custom 5431754163253973611177.05%
custom 5285423034046384127145.81%
💔135.39%
custom 528322908314721184752.07%
💋52.07%
custom 528305003455057413731.24%
😭31.24%
🔥20.83%
custom 529174751512366413610.415%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kamyra_d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC39 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

воооов итс соу cute

custom 53078412042583765707custom 54317541632539736113custom 52832121695659977422custom 52829527836060906541

7 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC52 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

а вот моя часть крутая да)

custom 54339824653015829748custom 52832121695659977424custom 53078412042583765703custom 52854230340463841271

7 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC46 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @kimiiliartsPhoto

Заколлабились с камурой шобы слелать артик трефиксу =)

custom 54339824653015829746

7 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC81 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ха че то меня занесло и я вернулась в фд этого сраного комикса

custom 53078412042583765709custom 52829527836060906545

6 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC78 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

стабильно 1-2 раза в год рисую байлеров

custom 52829527836060906543custom 52832121695659977421

6 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC78 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

жалкие попытки вернуть свой так называемый прайм

custom 528321216956599774211custom 53078412042583765705custom 52829527836060906542custom 52832290831472118472custom 54317541632539736112

5 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC74 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я листала свой скетчбук и оказывается когда то рисовала лололошку

custom 54339824653015829748

5 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC77 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я реакции крутые поставила и их больше стало🩷

custom 543175416325397361110custom 53078412042583765702custom 52829527836060906541custom 54339824653015829741

4 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC84 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

смотрите вам нравится

custom 53078412042583765709custom 52832121695659977422

3 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC96 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

арту если что месяца 3

custom 52829527836060906544custom 52832121695659977422

3 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC90 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я еашла еще арт меня кружки вдохновили

custom 530784120425837657012custom 52832121695659977422custom 52854230340463841272

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kamyra_d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 692,395 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴋᴀʍyrᴀ …🐇” (@kamyra_d), 128 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamyra_d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.