登!入!收!錢!😁😁 - 易博EB😁 金仔外賣認證😁 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 😁 www.eb8hk.com 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 有咩唔明😁隨時搵我 @eb8hkc 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 金仔唯一帳號 @eb8hkc 😁 本人唔會自動私聊你地轉帳😁 亦唔會搞乜撚野投資群組😁 私聊時記得睇清楚係咪 @eb8hkc
❤13custom 60869756693491257253custom 60643899181031834732custom 63255743740908693712

Channel
@kamkei8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,707subscribers
+43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003797956847 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kamkei8 |
| Description | 返工是墜落、馬會是娛樂 本人 : @eb8hkc 切勿轉帳給何疑人物🔥 本人不窮 唔會要你地錢☺️ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kamkei8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 10,707 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 10,723 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 10,727 | +28 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 10,699 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 10,697 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 10,700 | +20 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 10,680 | +16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 10,664 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 10,673 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 10,664 | first reading |
71 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 136,177 |
| Reactions total | 1,240 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,240 reactions across 70 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6325574374090869371 | 332 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 225 | 18.1% | |
| custom 6086975669349125725 | 171 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 166 | 13.4% | |
| custom 6282654984945274801 | 109 | 8.79% | |
| custom 6064389918103183473 | 91 | 7.34% | |
| custom 6265055196808743656 | 91 | 7.34% | |
| custom 6309978677824196525 | 29 | 2.34% | |
| custom 6062369449523027461 | 20 | 1.61% | |
| custom 6064622658085985400 | 5 | 0.403% | |
| custom 6309575058272554305 | 1 | 0.081% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kamkei8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
登!入!收!錢!😁😁 - 易博EB😁 金仔外賣認證😁 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 😁 www.eb8hk.com 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 有咩唔明😁隨時搵我 @eb8hkc 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 金仔唯一帳號 @eb8hkc 😁 本人唔會自動私聊你地轉帳😁 亦唔會搞乜撚野投資群組😁 私聊時記得睇清楚係咪 @eb8hkc
❤13custom 60869756693491257253custom 60643899181031834732custom 63255743740908693712
有冇手足鐘意打POKER😁? 全球真人匯合,每日都湯洛雯 絕無機械人,上帝視角 最高獎金可達5000USDT! 係邊度可以打?就係我地易博😁 😁 www.eb8hk.com 😀😀😀😀😀 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
❤3custom 60623694495230274612custom 62650551968087436562
有幾何見金仔搞細波😁? 琴晚利物浦2.5細中左😁 今日整多條赫根3.5細😁 兄弟們,一齊上😁😁
❤8🔥5custom 63255743740908693712
話明回血!😁 回返條曼飛 兄弟們登入收錢😁😁 - 易博EB😁 金仔外賣認證😁 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 😁 www.eb8hk.com 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 有咩唔明😁隨時搵我 @eb8hkc 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 金仔唯一帳號 @eb8hkc 😁 本人唔會自動私聊你地轉帳😁 亦唔會搞乜撚野投資群組😁 私聊時記得睇清楚係咪 @eb8hkc
custom 632557437409086937114❤11🔥3custom 62826549849452748011
再黎!西甲大波波😁😁😁 回血只此一次😁😁😁
❤14🔥4custom 63255743740908693712
騙徒開始扮我,大家小心 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 金仔唯一帳號 @eb8hkc 😁 本人唔會自動私聊你地轉帳😁 亦唔會搞乜撚野投資群組😁 私聊時記得睇清楚係咪 @eb8hkc
custom 63255743740908693717❤2custom 60643899181031834732custom 63099786778241965251
晏啲睇戲唔得閒睇波😁😁😁 今晚!我曼😁 必須贏😁😁😁
🔥14❤3custom 63255743740908693712custom 60643899181031834731
上半場搞掂!追數日😁 兄弟們有跟既登入收錢😁😁 - 易博EB😁 金仔外賣認證😁 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 😁 www.eb8hk.com 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 有咩唔明😁隨時搵我 @eb8hkc 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 金仔唯一帳號 @eb8hkc 😁 本人唔會自動私聊你地轉帳😁 亦唔會搞乜撚野投資群組😁 私聊時記得睇清楚係咪 @eb8hkc
❤9custom 63255743740908693714custom 60869756693491257253
那個叫做正義那個戰無不勝😁 日本仔雙進球冇撚難度😁😁😁 - 易博EB😁 金仔外賣認證😁 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 😁 www.eb8hk.com 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 有咩唔明😁隨時搵我 @eb8hkc 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 金仔唯一帳號 @eb8hkc 😁 本人唔會自動私聊你地轉帳😁 亦唔會搞乜撚野投資群組😁 私聊時記得睇清楚係咪 @eb8hkc
🔥12❤5custom 63255743740908693715
整多條!韓仔雙進球😁😁 回血飛!兄弟們一齊上😁😁
🔥7❤3custom 63255743740908693713
再黎日假😁 雙進球! 呢個禮拜雙進球好旺😁
🔥6❤5custom 60869756693491257253custom 60643899181031834732custom 62650551968087436562
仲未開易博既朋友仔😁 又有新活動啦😁😁😁 首充😁😁😁送😁😁😁 未拎既朋友仔可以入去拎啦! 😁 www.eb8hk.com
❤4custom 60623694495230274612🔥1custom 62650551968087436561
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @kamkei8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 796,789 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“金仔🫂 波馬心水頻道💰” (@kamkei8), 10,707 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamkei8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.