Мне мой чатGPT прислал огромный текст, с разрешения ИИ я его почистил, слегка отредактиряоал- убрал нецензурщину, смягчил некоторые формулировки. ИИ одобрил. Ответ на пост на канале Сергеевича который ему отправила авторка. То, что сегодня любую критику в адрес поведения женщин пытаются представить как “одержимость женщинами”, — это удобная подмена понятий. Для верующего человека вопрос женского поведения никогд…

Channel
Kamilot
@kamilovkamil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,960subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001152127993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kamilovkamil |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kamilovkamil |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 2,960 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 2,967 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 2,968 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 2,969 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 2,968 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 2,968 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 61.1%
- avg views ÷ 2,960 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,810
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 February 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,810 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 99
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 12
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
- Most on one post
- 54
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kamilovkamil. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🎙Твой каждодневный выбор и как это влияет на твою жизнь.
Я не любитель футбола. На первом матче, который я посетил, стал свидетелем столкновения Бурунова с Перхуном. На входе вместо билета пришлось показать полиции, что могу подтянуться 10 раз. Надо отдать должное Руслану — он проделал большую работу. Я, конечно, смотреть не буду, но для тех, кто помнит «Анжи» начала 2000-х и любит футбол, этот фильм — для вас. https://youtu.be/a9r5pojTWPc?si=Bq1J-0g6PZUjWwrO
Я вожу детей в спортивные секции. И заметил, что иногда больше, чем за своими детьми, я наблюдаю за родителями других детей. Они очень активно включены в тренировочный процесс. Обходя тренера, подсказывают сыну: как правильно делать, что нужно делать, как не нужно делать. И я смотрю на это и думаю: если вы нашли тренера, которому хотите отдать ребёнка, доверьте это дело профессионалу. Он этим занимается. Он знае…
На днях польский стример Łatwogang собрал рекордные ~70 млн $ стрим длился 9 дней. Это мировой рекорд собранный денег в онлайн трансляции, все собранные средства пойдут для детей болеющих раком. А рублях это более 5млрд.
Альхамдулиллах. Менее чем за месяц. Собрали такую сумму Спасибо всем причастным. Желаю терпения фондам, сейчас у них будет огромный объем работы. Пусть Всевышний облегчит
http://t.me/aiamlistbot Тут вы можете оставить свою заявку на обучение.
Про самый главный навык 2026
Отмазки делают сегодняшний день легче, но завтрашний сложнее. А дисциплина делает сегодняшний день сложнее, но завтрашний день легче.
Среди людей старшего поколения 70+ встречаются те, кто воспринимает возраст как привилегию — как право идти вне очереди, нарушать порядок и ожидать безусловного уважения: «Я старше — значит, мне можно». Таких наглецов я никогда не пропускаю. Всегда говорю, что в их почтенном возрасте некрасиво показывать пример неуважения и наглости к окружающим, и аккуратно указываю на их место в очереди. Люди в очереди и сами ста…
Помощь людям в трудные минуты — одно из величайших видов поклонения, и тот, кто стремится получить помощь от Аллаха, пусть поможет Его рабам, как сказал пророк ﷺ: «Аллах помогает своему рабу, пока раб помогает своему брату». Напоминайте людям об Аллахе, о важности покаяния, и помогайте им чем можете, материально, физически и мольбами.
Возможность помочь пострадавшим https://m.tooba.com/t26w
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kamilovkamil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 837,678 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@askrasul · 94,771
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kamilot” (@kamilovkamil), 2,960 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamilovkamil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.