Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 426–439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 09:40
428
+1
29 Aug 2026, 00:26
427
-2
21 Aug 2026, 23:47
429
-4
14 Aug 2026, 22:26
433
-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:16
437
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:38
437
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,405 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🏆
224
15.9%
❤🔥
161
11.5%
❤
159
11.3%
🍓
158
11.2%
🔥
122
8.68%
🍾
117
8.33%
👍
99
7.05%
⚡
88
6.26%
💯
79
5.62%
🙏
47
3.35%
custom 5373112999076699207
27
1.92%
😍
27
1.92%
🦄
18
1.28%
💋
15
1.07%
🤝
15
1.07%
🥰
15
1.07%
🤗
12
0.854%
👌
11
0.783%
🤩
10
0.712%
🕊
1
0.071%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,405 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 15 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kamennaya_sila. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 15 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Угадаете камень?
Оказывает достаточно мягкое воздействие на энергетические центры человека
Сначала воздействует через чакру Анахату (4 Сердечная чакра)
После чего активизирует чакру Вишудху (5 Горловая чакра)
Далее вступает в активное взаимодействие с подсознанием человека.
Камень "с характером" и не подчиняется негативным программам и разрушительным мыслям.
Человеку чистому, идущему по пути просветления и получен…
Ваше предназначение и баланс минераллов.
Расчëт энергопотенциала при рождении это ваша индивидуальная "Инструкция к применению".
Она показывает не только врождëнный ресурс, но и образ жизни, на который вас "запрограммировала" природа.
Главная ценность расчëта это глубокое понимание своего предназначения.
Думаю, многие задавались
этим вопросом.
Вы узнаëте не только ëмкость потенциала каждой чакры, но и свои родовы…
Чемодан без ручки?
Или ресурс?
Каждый из нас приходит в мир с уникальным багажом души.
Это энергия, наработанная в прошлых воплощениях.
Это наш стартовый капитал.
Раскрытые чакры указывают на сферы, где мы уже достигли максимума.
Слабые центры - на те области, которые были нам неинтересны и не доработаны.
Хорошая новость в том, что любой потенциал можно развить.
Однако сделать это только медитациями не получится.
…
Как "Рыбам" подобрать свой камень?
Стабильно приходят подобные вопросы от людей:
- Скажите, мне можно носить Турмалин? Я по Зодиаку Водолей.
- Какой камень мне надо, я Козерог?
Т.е. по данному замыслу — все люди разделены на 12 типов? Всë? Было бы печально.
🟣 А что, если каждый человек, это отдельный, особенный мир? Как вам такой подход?
Да, у одинаковых знаков Зодиака имеются схожие черты. Но что касается перс…
Для развития нужны действия.
Причëм они должны быть совершенно отличающимися от тех, которые мы предпринимали.
Потому, что из-за них мы находимся в данной точке (каждый в своей).
Задайте себе вопрос:
"Я точно хочу меняться, чтобы то, к чему стремлюсь, наконец-то случилось? "
Если ответ "Да"
Значит, вы созрели.
Осознание:
Нужна не методика на час,
а постоянная поддержка. Инструмент, который всегда с вами.
Которы…
И всë-таки
ОНИ РАБОТАЮТ
О принципах энергетического взаимодействия.
Кристаллы, обладая стабильной физической и электромагнитной структурой, выступают в качестве эталонов-камертонов для гармонизации и балансировки энергетических центров (чакр) человека через механизмы резонанса и феномена пьезоэффекта.
Энергия самоцветов — это не метафора.
Кристаллы кварца (Аметист, Цитрин, Горный хрусталь) и другие структуры при …
КАМНИ НЕ РАБОТАЮТ.
Как это ни обидно, но у них нет ни рук, ни ног.
Работаете вы.
Есть соблазн — купить камень, положить на тумбочку и ждать, пока он изменит жизнь.
Притянет любовь, богатство, убережëт от сглаза.
Но это магия из сказки, где герой пассивен, а волшебство происходит само.
В реальной истории герой — это вы.
Камень — не включатель, который можно включить, чтобы загорелась лампочка удачи.
Он не заменит…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kamennaya_sila. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 15 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КАМЕННАЯ СИЛА/НАТАЛЬЯ” (@kamennaya_sila), 428 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamennaya_sila.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
