Channel
@kamarajias
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
2,142subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001365825903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kamarajias |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kamarajias |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 2,142 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 2,141 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 2,142 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 2,144 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 2,147 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 2,166 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 2,172 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 2,172 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,967 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Which one of the following wetlands is best described by the above characteristics?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Consider the following characteristics of a wetland in India: It is located in the Eastern Himalayan region. It is situated in Arunachal Pradesh. It lies within the Kamlang Tiger Reserve and Wildlife Sanctuary.
With reference to the Supreme Court's ruling on extending protection against domestic cruelty to live-in relationships, consider the following statements: (1) The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices Sanjay Karol and N Kotiswar Singh. (2) The ruling extends criminal protection under Section 498A IPC to corresponding provisions under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). (3) The initial bur…
PCM 2027 - Sociology Optional Class Friday, August 7 · 5:00 – 6:00pm Google Meet joining info Video call link: https://meet.google.com/pbj-dcru-rrx
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Which of the above are direct security or ecological consequences of unauthorized geotagging?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Arrange the above solar parks in the correct geographical sequence from north to south.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
With reference to the implications of unauthorized geotagging, consider the following: 1.Increased risk of physical stalking, theft and targeted cybercrime 2.Compromise of the security of defence establishments, air bases and naval installations 3.Escalation of human–wildlife conflict through the disclosure of sensitive wildlife locations and movement corridors 4.Structural failure of public land registry databases 5…
With reference to the major solar parks developed under the Solar Parks Scheme in India, consider the following: 1.Bhadla Solar Park 2.Rewa Ultra Mega Solar Park 3.Pavagada Solar Park
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kamarajias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which one of the following wetlands is best described by the above characteristics?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the above are direct security or ecological consequences of unauthorized geotagging?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Arrange the above solar parks in the correct geographical sequence from north to south.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How many of the above are intelligence-led operations launched specifically to dismantle Maoist strongholds in the Red Corridor?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How many of the above are favorable conditions for the commercial cultivation of tea?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KIA CHRONICLE” (@kamarajias), 2,142 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamarajias.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.