Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for إِلَى ٱلۡهُدَى ٱئۡتِنَا...د.كمال كشكو

Channel

إِلَى ٱلۡهُدَى ٱئۡتِنَا...د.كمال كشكو

@kamalkishko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

367subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002377942701
TypeChannel
Username@kamalkishko
Descriptionاركب معنا ....المحطة هي الجنة
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kamalkishko

Growth

36731 Aug 2026, 08:15 — 367 subscribers31 Aug 2026, 08:30 — 367 subscribers31 Aug 2026, 08:1531 Aug 2026, 08:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 08:30367no change
31 Aug 2026, 08:15367first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 367 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.8
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total574
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
75
Videos
12
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1381.3%
💯212.5%
👍16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC2 viewsread 31 August 2026

أسرانا يا مولانا، هذا زمانك الكريم؛ أَغِثْ لَهْفَانَهُمْ وَسَكِّنْ وَلْهَانَهُمْ؛ إنك أنت العزيز الرحيم. يا فتَّاح افتح مغاليق أبوابهم، يا قدُّوس بارك ضعيف أسبابهم، يا منَّان صلهم قريبًا بأحبابهم. ✍️ د.حمزة أبو زهرة فك الله أسره... #ك_ك

29 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

الحمد لله.. مات اليوم الرجل الذي أكل ميراثنا؛ حقي وحقَّ إخوتي، يوم كنّا أيتامًا صغارًا لا نملك استرداد حقَّنا. واليوم، أحمد الله أن بدَّل ضعفي قوة، وفاقتي غنى، ولو أردتُ استرداد حقي الآن كاملًا لفعلت بإذن الله وبالطُرق المشروعة، وقد رزقني الله من فضله -بالحلال- أضعاف ما كان يملك، لكن الحقوق لا تسقط بالتقادم، وموعد الخصومة الحق بين يدي الله، وهو خير الحاكمين. "وسوف تعلم غدًا يا غُدر إذا وضع الله الكرسي وجمع الأولين

1

27 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026

أريت لو كنا كفارًا ( والعياذ بالله تعالى ) ووقع علينا هذا الظلم، فهل يتركه الله؟! حاشا لله أن يفلت منه ظالم، ونظن بالله العدل العظيم أن ينتقم ممن يظلم أي إنسان، ولو كان كافرًا؛ فكيف بمن كان لله موحِّدًا، محبًّا، صابرًا، محتسبًا، باذلًا كل ما يملك لله؟! والله لن يُخلف الله وعده، ولن يترك جنده، ولن يفلت منه ظالم، ولن يضيع حق مظلوم عنده، ولو طال الزمان وطال. لن يضيّعنا الله، وسيجعل ربنا لما ترون فرجًا ومخرجًا. #وإنا

2

23 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC62 viewsread 31 August 2026

" فأرسل معنا أخانا " كانت لهم مصلحة"، فقالوا: "أخانا".. وعندما انتهت، قالوا: "إن ابنك سرق.." يتغير الخطاب بتغير المصالح. #ك_ك

20 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC91 viewsread 31 August 2026

سؤال أين الله ووهم الاستحقاق ! يسأل الناس تحت ضغط الزلزلة: أين الله؟ لماذا لا يتدخل ؟ هذا السؤال يعني أنهم يعلمون أن الله حاضر، وهو الخالق والمدبر والقادر، والإجابة على أساس هذا العلم.. حسنا ، ما دمنا نعلم بوجود الله وتدبيره وقدرته، فهل اتخذنا عنده عهداً ثم أخلف وعده؟ هل كان هناك استحقاق وجودي على الله أن يمدنا بنعمه دائماً من أمن وعافية ووفرة لكن الله أخلف وعده ؟ مهما عظم الابتلاء يظل قليلا في الحياة ، وتظل النعم أك

18 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC91 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

"ولما توجه تلقاء مدين قال عسى ربي أن يهديني سواء السبيل" قال ابن عباس: خرج موسى ولا علم له بالطريق إلا حسن ظن بربه. #ك_ك

👍1

15 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC90 viewsread 31 August 2026

ﻫﺠﻢ ﺫئب ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺮﻳﺔ أغلب سكانها يعملون بتربية الأغنام ﻓﻬﺮﻋﺖ كلاب ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺭاء ﺍﻟﺬئب فصار يركض ﻭالكلاﺏ ﺗﺮﻛﺾ ﻭﺭﺍءه، ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺒﺖ ﺍلكلاﺏ ﺭﺟﻌﺖ ﺇلّا كلبا ﻭﺍﺣﺪا ظل ﻳﻄﺎﺭﺩه، ﻭعندما ﺗﻌﺐ، توقف وقال للكلب: هل ﺍﻧﺖ كلب ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ؟ قال: ﻻ ... قال الذئب : انت كلب ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺔ ؟ قال: ﻻ ... قال الذئب : ﺍﻧﺖ كلب ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ؟ قال: ﻻ ... قال الذئب: ﺃﻧﺖ كلب مَن إذن ؟! قال: ﺃنا كلب الخياط ... قال الذئب : ﺍلخياط عندﻩ ﻏﻨﻢ ؟ قال الكلب : ﻻ ... قال

11 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

وإني والله لأغضب من حزني.. مع تتابع الأحداث التي عشتها في عمري، والكمّ الكبير من الأشياء التي وقعت عليَّ أو معي، وكنت حزينًا لوقوعها، ثم ما يلبث أن أجد الخير، كل الخير، فيما قدّره الله لي، وأجد أن تدبير الله لي كان أفضل وأعظم من تدبيري لنفسي ولأهلي.. صار يقيني التام أن كل ما يقدّره الله لي هو الخير، حتى وإن بدا فيه الشر أو التعب والمشقة؛ يقينًا لا يشوبه أي شك. فحين يقع لي حدث جديد، وأحزن بفطرتي؛ لأن الإنسان مفطور

4

4 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC88 viewsread 31 August 2026

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid022uncTKhmEVgYQeBh1GiKzgCkDEXJ7LGf5ZHUpWFgoMrrD8HtZn87deXv4B1J8H4Ml&id=100005882315949&mibextid=Nif5oz

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kamalkishko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“إِلَى ٱلۡهُدَى ٱئۡتِنَا...د.كمال كشكو” (@kamalkishko), 367 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamalkishko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.