Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 23 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,388–2,403 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 19:21
2,392
+2
12 Sept 2026, 19:40
2,390
-3
8 Sept 2026, 15:40
2,393
-3
2 Sept 2026, 22:38
2,396
-1
31 Aug 2026, 04:27
2,397
-1
27 Aug 2026, 18:58
2,398
-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:57
2,401
no change
25 Aug 2026, 01:15
2,401
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
56.4%
avg views ÷ 2,392 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
7 (24 June 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
1,350
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 58s
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
548 reactions across 7 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
247
45.1%
🔥
155
28.3%
❤
69
12.6%
custom 5436382926818256347
22
4.01%
😱
18
3.28%
👏
10
1.82%
🎉
9
1.64%
🏆
8
1.46%
😍
3
0.547%
🥴
2
0.365%
👎
1
0.182%
💩
1
0.182%
🤬
1
0.182%
🤮
1
0.182%
🤯
1
0.182%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 548 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
1 of 7 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,310
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,560
over 6 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwGx8f3
1
26 June 2026
26 June 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 24 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Пропали в лесах Карелии 🌲🏍️
Давно ничего сюда не публиковал. Но причина уважительная — мы с Лерой пропали в лесах Карелии 😁
Как вы уже поняли, на Африке мы отправились в большое путешествие на север. Сначала колесили по Карелии, а потом решили не останавливаться и добрались до Мурманской области. Ну а раз уж забрались так далеко — доехали и до Териберки, чтобы своими глазами увидеть Баренцево море.
И это было неве…
Иран на мотоцикле: Самый красивый закат
Снова в пути! На этот раз — Иран. Сажусь на Honda XRV750 Africa Twin и еду из Тегерана в Эсфахан. Дорога как всегда непредсказуемая, но одно мгновение стоило всего маршрута — самый красивый закат в пустыне.
Не удержался и свернул с трассы, чтобы просто замереть и насладиться моментом. Такое нельзя пропускать.
🎬 СМОТРЕТЬ РОЛИК: https://youtu.be/qbJDwBl5tPQ
Подпишись, чтобы н…
Поехали в Карелию!🤠
Отправляемся с Лерой на мотоцикле Хонда Африка Твин, хотим проехать через Санкт-Петербург, затем Выборг, потом вдоль Ладожского озера и махнуть в сторону Мурманска. Подскажите, в какие места стоит по вашему мнению заехать?"🤔
Ну что, свершилось! Новый шлем - новая глава!
Спустя 7 лет путешествий решил прислушаться к вашим голосам и взять более подходящий шлем для мотопутешествий! 😅
Главные критерии были: модуляр (чтобы борода откидывалась) и козырёк, мой выбор пал на шлем HJC i80.
Спасибо Лере, что составила мне компанию, съездили в ТЦ «Формула Х» и нашли идеальный цвет. Эмоции зашкаливают! Честно говоря, последний раз я так же ярко ра…
Подготовка к мотопутешествию идёт полным ходом! 🛠
Заехал в мотомагазин Байк Ленд за расходниками:
⏺Масло Motul 7100 10W-50 (люблю красненькое🍷);
⏺Масляный фильтр MCP (попробую отечественный бренд);
⏺Ремкомплект для гарнитуры Sena 30K (правое ухо то работает, то нет, буду менять наушники).
ТО по замене масла и фильтра сделали с Димой в гараже оперативно, столько раз уже это делали, что я уже наизусть знаю, что нужн…
Mitas, ГДЕ ПРОТЕКТОР?
Честно говоря, впечатления от покрышки Mitas Enduro Trail смешанные. За 20 тысяч километров покрышка превратилась в решето, шашки повырывало прямо до корда.
Первые тревожные звоночки появились уже на 3 000 км в Турции: заметил первые трещины. Потсепенно они становились глубже и больше, а под конец шашки начало вырывать с мясом — прямо до корда, последнюю тысячу я ехал, стараясь просто не думат…
Зацените обновку! 🔥
Наконец-то поставил свежую покрышку Shinko E705 вместо убитой в хлам Mitas Enduro Trail. На той откатал почти 21 000 км. Меняю только заднюю, так как передняя еще походит.
Честно, наездился на Mitas вдоль и поперек, теперь хочу составить свое личное мнение о Shinko. Посмотрим, как она покажет себя в деле, не подведет ли в грязи и на трассе.
Кто уже катает на такой? Делитесь опытом в комментари…
👍25❤16👏4custom 54363829268182563472🏆1👎1💩1🤮1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @kaluginvadim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
THUJOY @TheThujoy · 26,017 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вадим Калугин” (@kaluginvadim), 2,392 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaluginvadim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
