Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Digital Patrón

Channel

Digital Patrón

@kalifanov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

498subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003159320788
TypeChannel
Username@kalifanov
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kalifanov

Growth

495498496.57 August 2026 — 495 subscribers8 August 2026 — 495 subscribers16 August 2026 — 498 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 495–498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:29498+3
8 Aug 2026, 04:20495no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:07495first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 16 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.6%
avg views ÷ 498 subscribers
Avg views / post
212
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held14 (16 May 20263 August 2026)
Views total212
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

331 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣7121.5%
🔥6419.3%
👍4413.3%
4313.0%
❤‍🔥3911.8%
😁319.37%
💯195.74%
👏113.32%
🏆51.51%
🤩30.906%
🗿10.302%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kalifanov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC212 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем легкой недели, друзья!

🤣167👍2

30 Jun 2026, 16:13 UTC584 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в рамках Клуба цифровых директоров прошла стратегическая сессия «Технология как актив: поиск драйверов нового инвестиционного цикла» У нас была необычная сессия – в роли ведущих выступили Светлана Леонова, амбассадор клуба, и я. Кажется, у нас получился живой и честный разговор. Тема звучала масштабно, но мы старались держать фокус на главном: что можно сделать уже завтра, имея те ресурсы, которые есть сего

9🔥7👏2👍1

18 Jun 2026, 12:31 UTC534 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥10👍9❤‍🔥4🤩21

16 Jun 2026, 10:24 UTC532 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @konturuniversityVideo

Трансформация невозможна в одиночку На нашей прошлой встрече преподаватель Контур Университета и эксперт по цифровизации Кирилл Алифанов говорил о важном: цифровая трансформация не происходит усилиями одного ИТ-директора или одного руководителя Для серьезных изменений нужны союзники — люди, которые понимают цели бизнеса, говорят на одном языке и готовы вместе осваивать новые технологии 💡Именно поэтому обучаться се

💯11👏98👍3❤‍🔥2🤩1

16 Jun 2026, 10:24 UTC405 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В одиночку ничего не получится!

💯2

7 Jun 2026, 09:42 UTC508 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика #мемасдня

🤣23😁10💯61

3 Jun 2026, 13:02 UTC595 views41 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Сделал сам – помоги другому Друзья, многие из вас знают, что сейчас я выступаю главным образом как независимый эксперт в области цифровизации, искусственного интеллекта и кибербезопасности: участвую в профильных конференциях, консультирую компании и занимаюсь личным менторингом. Планирую постепенно делиться здесь подробностями и реальными кейсами по каждому из направлений, а в этом посте хочу подробнее остановиться

🔥19❤‍🔥8👍6🏆52🗿1

29 May 2026, 12:08 UTC442 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @konturuniversityPhoto

Цифровая трансформация - все о ней говорят, но мало, кто ее видел? 26 мая 2026 вместе с профессором Контур Университета Кириллом Алифановым разбирались с цифровой трансформацией и ИИ-агентами. О чем говорили: 🟦 О хронологии расцвета и тупиках цифровой трансформации за последние 10 лет. 🟦 О вызовах цифровой трансформации, которые испытывают компании ("лоскутная" архитектура, инженерный кадровый кризис, импортозамещ

🔥96❤‍🔥4👍3

26 May 2026, 10:08 UTC406 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня провожу две интересные сессии для Контур Университета в Екатеринбурге! https://event.kontur.ru/ekosistema-instrumenty-cifrovojj-bezopasnosti-gos-id-16454 На вторую еще не поздно зарегистрироваться и подключиться онлайн: https://it.konturuniversity.ru/may26/?utm_source=tg&utm_medium=smm&utm_campaign=ku-it-26may&utm_content=post_08.05.26

🔥10👍6❤‍🔥51

26 May 2026, 10:08 UTC392 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @konturuniversityVideo

Сегодня, 26 мая, тот самый день погружения в тему цифровой трансформации вместе с экспертом Контур Университета. ⚡Кирилл Алифанов уже в Контуре: провёл обзор ЦИПР-2026 для государственных организаций и приглашает вас успеть приехать к 17:30 на Малопрудную, 5 на бизнес-лекцию "Цифровая трансформация: 10 лет изменений. Текущие и будущие вызовы"

❤‍🔥74👍4

21 May 2026, 09:31 UTC308 viewsread 8 August 2026

Те самые юмористические правила, которые я все нарушил на ЦИПРе!)

21 May 2026, 09:31 UTC423 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @yusufovruslan

Итак, вы на ЦИПРе, и вам очень важно, чтобы этом все узнали. Методичка — ниже. Также подходит для ПМЭФа. 1. Сфотографировать бейдж. Все так делают, но если у вас бейдж спикера или вип — дает пару очков в social proof. В идеале — бейдж на вытянутой руке на фоне вип-бара с небрежной подписью вроде «отдыхаем от трудов». 2. Фото вокзала или поезда. Можно писать «Нижний ждет!», а можно обойтись полунамеком. 3. Сфотогра

🤣27👍10😁94❤‍🔥2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kalifanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Digital Patrón” (@kalifanov), 498 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalifanov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.