Channel
@kalashnikovaobzorit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,151subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001783172207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kalashnikovaobzorit |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kalashnikovaobzorit |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 7,151 | -36 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 7,187 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 7,194 | -10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 7,204 | -11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 7,215 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:47 | 7,215 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (25 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,897 |
| Reactions total | 111 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
243 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 168 | 69.1% | |
| custom 5258066218379673439 | 24 | 9.88% | |
| 🫡 | 20 | 8.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 5.76% | |
| 💅 | 7 | 2.88% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 2.47% | |
| custom 5433661888942578806 | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.412% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Рубрика что последнее заказала на озоне. Я очень люблю трусики от бренда твое. Очень приятные к телу и бюджетные (одна пара меньше чем 200₽). И заказала вот этот бустер крем, вижу его у многих блогеров, которые пользуются особенно активно для зоны шеи (с моими кольцами Венеры мне это надо)))🙂
❤8custom 52580662183796734392
Из моих последних покупок с озона - вот такие шарики (говорят они очень вкусные) и вот этот пилинг для кожи головы ( самый бюджетный и рабочий, как говорят, вот хочу затестить)🤗
❤13🫡3custom 52580662183796734392
Сегодня съездила на уход для волос. Сделали ещё пилинг дополнительно, так как у меня минимально появилась перхоть и стали выпадать волосы (низкое железо)🥲. Мастер похвалила, что пользуюсь вот этой несмывашкой и я решила и вам ее посоветовать) лучшее, что я когда -либо пробовала в своей жизни!😍✨волосы шикарные после неё ))) даже мой блонд 😃
❤13💅2custom 52580662183796734392
Такие забавные лонги нашла озоне. Взяла себе с карлсоном🤩 если нужен артикул - пинайте, я буду скидывать))) люблю в таких спать 🪐
❤17🫡7custom 52580662183796734391
По классике делюсь своими прикольными последними находками с озона))) Начиталась отзывов на данный крем (хотелось именно вишню) и заказала себе🪐 А ещё я очень люблю такие гвоздики. Они со временем чернеют, но за такую цену такую красоту считаю можно обновлять ✨🥹
❤14custom 52580662183796734393
Я сегодня быстренько пробежалась по светофору. Необычное и вкусное мороженое появилось. Цена 190 рублей. Можно брать 🙂
❤20custom 52580662183796734393💔1
Что я сейчас капец как жду с озона🫠 Вспомнила, что у ив роше безумно пахучие гели для душа. Взяла вот этот аромат (пишут, что запах овсяного печенья с молоком, такое я люблю 🥹), и захотелось арахисовой пасты. Тоже хвалят. Попробую. Поделюсь мнением 🙂
❤16custom 52580662183796734393custom 54336618889425788063
Давайте перекличку, я так по вам соскучилась!🥺поняла, что нужно заходить в канал и общаться с вами, чем-то делиться… Давайте перекличку! Сколько вам лет и откуда вы? Начну я, мне 28 лет и я из Московской области (Серебряные Пруды)💝🤗
❤40🫡8💅4
Такие классные резиновые сапоги можно урвать в светофоре. Разная палитра цветов и цена копеечная. Розовые самые вау 🤩 берём!
❤🔥14custom 52580662183796734396🫡2
Напомню, что я частенько веду группу ВК и набираю туда свою аудиторию. Там немного лайфа, интересных раскладов, отзывов и всегда можно со мной связаться💝 Кто ещё не подписался, обязательно подпишитесь🙂☺️ Группа ВК https://vk.ru/kalashnikovaaawbozon
❤7custom 52580662183796734392
Моя находка августа 😃Я тут класнючие кеды купила, очень удобные. Сейчас поделюсь ссылочкой, как раз на раннюю осень шикарно 💝
❤20💋6💅1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @kalashnikovaobzorit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Калашникова обзорит” (@kalashnikovaobzorit), 7,151 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalashnikovaobzorit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.