تا دوسال بعد ازدواج با کاندوم سکس کنید چون:

Channel
کلام و اشعار زیبا
@kalammmeziba1234
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,124subscribers
-1,575 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001265237320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kalammmeziba1234 |
| Description | قربون صدقه های ادبی ❤❤ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kalammmeziba1234 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 33,124 | -204 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 33,328 | -79 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 33,407 | -47 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 33,454 | -35 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 33,489 | -57 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 33,546 | -62 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 33,608 | -92 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 33,700 | -88 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 33,788 | -38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:11 | 33,826 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 33,851 | -35 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 33,886 | -30 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 33,916 | -22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 33,938 | -29 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 33,967 | -33 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 34,000 | -28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 34,028 | -33 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 34,061 | -34 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 34,095 | -63 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 34,158 | first reading |
Engagement
469 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.39%
- avg views ÷ 33,124 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 461
- 235 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 235
- of 469 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 469 (1 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 108,218 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈16,900
- Videos
- ≈3,350
- Links
- ≈542
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 15s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
دیگه شیر کاکائو نمیخورم😭😐چون
فواید لُخت خوابیدن : 🤩👿 😍
فیلم آموزشی سکس با کاندوم🍑
ذهن من : عه شیرکاکائو خریده برام حتما دوستم داره ولی واقعیت : عهههه شل شدم که چرا دارم اینجوری میشم جلو این پسره
وای تازه فهمیدم چرا شیرکاکائو به خورد دوست دختراتون میدین:) کثافتا😐
موقعیت من و اِکس بیشرفم وقتی هر بار که میرفتم پیشش شیر کاکائو به خوردم میداد ، منم میدیدما هعی دارم شل میشمم ولی خب از کجا بدونم ، تازه الان فهمیدم اون شیرکاکائو برا چی بوده ؛ کیان هر جا هستی بدون خیلیییی پست فطرتی ؛ اگه دوس پسر توام هعی شیر کاکائو به خوردت میده پس بیا برو دلیلش و از اینجا بخون ؛ یه چیزایی از اینجا فهمیده ام که تو این ۲۴ سال عمرم حتی به ذهنمم خطور نکرده بود : @Etelaateomoomi 🤍
تو تنها علتی هستی که به خاطر آن روزهای بیشتر ، شب های بیشتر و سهم بیشتری از زندگی می خواهم #جبران_خلیل_جبران 🌹🌿 @Ashaare_Ziba
ملکه اعظم منتظرته کانالی برای دخترا: جایی بین خنده، غرغر، کراش و چای عصرونه ☕😂 بیا عضو شو، جات خالیه https://t.me/+ysTtbbzi4tplYzI0
فیشنت sexy توری : 🍑🦶
دو ماهه نامزد کردیم ، هر بار میریم خرید خجالت میکشیدم باهاش برم لباس زیر بخرم ، اونم هعی میگفت مطمئنی چیز دیگه ای نمیخوای ، منم میپیچوندم ، دیروز پیام داده بسته ات امروز میرسه دستت گفتم چیه گفت نه باید خودت ببینی ، یکم قبل رسیده دستم باورم نمیشه این دو تا ست خوشگل و برام خریده ، با خجالت پیام دادم اینا چیه ، نوشته خب ما الان نامزدیم خجالت نداره که ، دفعه دیگه اصلا با هم انتخاب می کنیم ، گفتم از کجا گرفتی اصلا…
حضرت علی : هرچیزی زکاتی دارد و زکات عقل تحمل نادان است @Ashaare_Ziba
Showing the 12 most recent of 469 posts we hold for @kalammmeziba1234. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
لاس سکسی بلدی ؟!🔥
- اره0%
- نه0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سکس BDSM دوست داری ؟!
- آره خیلی😍0%
- نه فرق نداره0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کصت مو داره؟
- نه با ترفندهای اینجا شیو کردم دیگه درنمیاد0%
- اره گاییدههه0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ذاتِ لاپایی میدونی چیه؟
- آرههه0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ذاتِ لاپایی میدونی چیه؟
- آرههه0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
لاس سکسی بلدی ؟!🔥
- اره0%
- نه0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 469 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Ashaare_Ziba · 610118 postsBMI
@bank_irani · 173 postsلباس
@lebas · 2703 postsاصول فنگ شویی
@fngshoyi · 1072 postsDownloader +
@MyDLPlusBot · 82,8652 postsمحافظ سکسولوژی
@sexoloqy · 7592 postsهوش مصنوعی | ChatGPT
@Ai_FreeRoBot · 139,5491 postآرایشی 𝐀𝐧𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐩💄
@aner_shop1 · 47,0331 postAxe Fake|عکس فیک
@axe_fake · 4,2841 postکانفیگ های رایگان /V2RayNG / فیلتر شکن رایگان
@ConfigV2rayNG · 13,9891 postesme_mosbat
@esme_mosbat · 31 postفاک کلاس | Fuck Class
@fuckclass · 2,7821 postقاب گوشی 📱🤳💗
@Ghab_Center · 5,8001 postهای بانک | Hibank
@Hibank_ir · 2101 post🎀love story🎀
@love_story · 6071 postمحافظ پلاس توییت
@PlusTweetOfficial · 4,8241 postshixonshop.2024
@shixonshop · 11 postسکسی جگر
@StickerLokhti · 61 postاستوری باکلاس
@Storybaklas · 5051 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kalammmeziba1234 named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@darkproxy · 4,702,475#1
@Afkar · 1,028,918#2
@Allef · 237,051#3
@delbari · 409,842#4
@vazeiyatsefid · 144,073#5
@liwish · 175,606#6
@Sheerreno · 745#7
@Mava_gallery · 396#8
@Chavanam · 103,540#9
@Rohiyat · 98,320#10
@Lo_v5 · 126,291#11
@Duchar · 238,144#12
@freaki80 · 204 (as read 4 September 2026)#13
@yaldax22 · 1,516#14
@paTt_Maatt · 99 (as read 4 September 2026)#15
@fatemehTajik1 · 703#16
@Myelma · 113,740#17
@Zhakav_Chnnel · 14#18
@tavahomte · 31,870#19
@joichatluE8yv2rccRv2xu · 317#20
@tex0099 · 580 (as read 4 September 2026)#21
@textimix · 45,350#22
@poemsIread · 93,850#23
@cafeketab_Podcast · 11,087#24
@winstnchannel · 155,399#25
@Rainbowm2024 · 128 (as read 4 September 2026)#26
@Eternity_Chnl · 61,581#27
@barcod · 166,613#28
@sanart_2020 · 1,916#29
@DarklyMode · 29,883#30
@Naafaas_ir · 4,935#31
@immortal_me · 36,406#32
@girimbanooo · 11,959#33
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421#34
@unja_kee · 418,062#35
@nulluschnll · 70,216#36
@Sakhsiat · 128,370 (as read 4 September 2026)#37
@Taqvim_Farsi · 1,035#38
@boyoung_ir · 335#39
@Foodatun · 43,497#40
@ariaserverrrr · 310#41
@TikTok_China · 1,231#42
@rotindarsiii · 599#43
@Hogwartslover · 2,231#44
@sedayyebaran · 1,410 (as read 4 September 2026)#45
@NERKHLIRA · 7,812#46
@golhayerangarangmusicchannel1 · 2,754#47
@bratzadeh · 2,899#48
@Nescafe_coffee · 15,964#49
@storyhaam · 62,583#50
@OneBigDream · 803#51
@tiktokmodfarsi · 4,274#52
@parallaxtattoo · 3,167#53
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@textimix · 45,350
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@DarklyMode · 29,883
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کلام و اشعار زیبا” (@kalammmeziba1234), 33,124 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalammmeziba1234.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.