Channel
@kalacheva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,246subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001147156179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kalacheva |
| Created | Between 1 January 2017 and 30 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kalacheva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 2,246 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 2,249 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 2,241 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 2,242 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 2,242 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
549 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 283 | 51.5% | |
| 🔥 | 156 | 28.4% | |
| 🎉 | 40 | 7.29% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 3.64% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 2.37% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 2.00% | |
| custom 5282991940822910181 | 9 | 1.64% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 1.46% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.46% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.182% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 549reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, настал день икс, и которого я так долго ждала: Запуск бренда a-curate Сайт открыл свои двери 🩵🩵🩵 Ужасно радуюсь каждому вашему комментарию и репосту, спасибо вам большое ❤️🔥
🔥57🎉39❤28👏9💯3🤩3🥰1
Не легкую Не летнюю Книгу Читаю Про нездоровые отношения, любовью это язык не поворачивается назвать. Непростая, но целительная. Как прививка. Про книгу можно послушать выпуск «девчонок умнее стариков», кстати. А у вас что? Что читаете? Нравится?
❤26👍4💯3
Если вы думаете, что мы перестали смотреть ваши работы — вы ошибаетесь 😄 Просто невозможно оторваться, особенно когда вы продолжаете выкладывать такие рисунки! Напоминаем: уроки ещё доступны — только до 23:59 мск сегодня. Успейте досмотреть, если не всё посмотрели. СМОТРЕТЬ УРОКИ И обязательно публикуйте работы на платформе — завтра среди участников марафона, которые выложили рисунки, проведём розыгрыш творческих …
❤37🔥15👏4🤩2
Я в восторге от нашего летнего марафона, если честно) Для меня самый главный маркер - много классных самостоятельных работ. Радуюсь страшно❤️🔥 Надеюсь, вам тоже понравился марафон😅 И пока еще есть возможность посмотреть все уроки из него, если вы все пропустили вдруг)
❤17🔥5🥰3🤩2
Сегодня вечером проведу разбор работ. Конечно, не всех, но возможно именно ваша попадет в подборку🩵 К марафону можно присоединиться в любой момент в течение недели. https://klch.ru/y/01f7f31
❤9
Сегодня в 19:00 мск Вероника Калачёва проведёт разбор ваших работ в Zoom! Ссылку на трансляцию мы опубликуем здесь перед началом эфира. ❗️ Хотите, чтобы ваши работы попали на разбор? Загрузите их на платформу марафона сегодня до 18:00 мск. Важно: разборы от преподавателей – это не финал! Выполненное задание – это ваш билет в розыгрыш призов. Даже если разбор уже прошёл, не останавливайтесь – рисуйте и выкладывайте…
❤18
Уи! вижу уже первые работы по моему уроку! классно, что пробуете непривычное и сложное. Хочется дать напутствие: не бойтесь больших плоских пятен единого тона, они помогают "собрать" композицию и взгляд не блуждает в поисках главного в листе. Например - таким большим силуэтом может быть: лицо, волосы, фон, одежда, или даже собственная тень.
❤28🔥11🤩4custom 52829919408229101814👎1
Инст как-то совсем приуныл. А у вас как? Даже жалко, что наш рилс, который мне монтировал сын, увидело мало людей. Так что дублирую сюда, и зову на марафон, начинаем уже сегодня 🩵 Присоединиться
❤74🔥41👍7👏3💯2🤩2🥰2custom 52829919408229101812
17 июня начинается наш новый рисовальный марафон! Мне очень хотелось сделать марафон, где мы рисуем весело и азартно, без всяких «как надо». Чтобы был эксперимент и быть может на выходе - новый визуальный язык. У меня в уроке, например, будет Fashion-портрет. Я рассказываю как мыслю сама и как имея один референс как отправную точку - рождается с десяток разных рисунков. Я за время подготовки к марафону натурально …
❤46🔥27👏4custom 52829919408229101813🥰2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kalacheva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 447,665 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пестик и точилка” (@kalacheva), 2,246 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalacheva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.