Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ну и как это понимать?

Channel

ну и как это понимать?

@kak_ponimat_art

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,067subscribers

-65 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002105561568
TypeChannel
Username@kak_ponimat_art
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kak_ponimat_art

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,0676,1326,099.58 August 2026 — 6,132 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,131 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,124 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,119 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,116 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,110 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,102 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,095 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,089 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,087 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,077 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,071 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,067 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,057–6,142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 19:576,067-4
11 Sept 2026, 23:576,071-6
7 Sept 2026, 18:396,077-10
2 Sept 2026, 17:136,087-2
30 Aug 2026, 19:246,089-6
27 Aug 2026, 09:366,095-7
24 Aug 2026, 09:376,102-8
20 Aug 2026, 12:526,110-6
17 Aug 2026, 14:056,116-3
14 Aug 2026, 15:356,119-5
11 Aug 2026, 11:486,124-7
8 Aug 2026, 10:236,131-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:306,132first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9852.7%
🔥2412.9%
😁158.06%
🤔158.06%
👏126.45%
👍115.91%
🍓63.23%
👻21.08%
🤯21.08%
🗿10.538%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Feb 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @theafflatusPhoto

Mood: наши герои Билетов остается всё меньше, а ведь мы ещё не обсудили в деталях, кто станет нашим спикером на встрече, посвящённой скандалам в искусстве. Итак, барабанная дробь, и я с гордостью представляю вам Ирину Кустову - исследователя современного российского уличного искусства, менеджера и представителя молодых российских стрит-арт художников, коллекционера и собирателя стрит-арта. Когда я впервые услышала

12

21 Feb 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,330 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @theafflatusPhoto

Mood: новый сезон The Afflatus x Four Seasons Lion Palace. Друзья! Со слезами счастья на глазах приглашаю вас на новую лекцию сообщества The Afflatus, которая пройдет 28 февраля. Мы поговорим об искусстве. Тема: "Скандалы в искусстве: художники, бросившие вызов системе". Благодарю каждого, кто принял участие в выборе темы. Совесть. Мораль. Красота. Благоразумие. Традиция. Скрепы. Цензура. Мнение... Лишь немногие

9

13 Feb 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,410 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Согласны ли Вы с Хрущевым?

  1. Да, лютая "мазня" и "говно"!37%
  2. Нет! Вы не понимаете цимис Авангарда!36%
  3. Черт его знает, гулял по первому этажу, смотрел на "Мишек в сосновом бору"27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

13 Feb 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,400 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Женщина с ребенком, 1958 Элий Белютин ну и как это понимать? ⚡

8🤔7🔥6

13 Feb 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,280 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Городской пейзаж, 1960 Владислав Зубарев ну и как это понимать? ⚡

12🤔5

13 Feb 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,240 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Чем же возмущался Никита Сергеевич? Яйцо, 1962 Юло Соостер ну и как это понимать? ⚡

🔥13👏104😁3

13 Feb 2026, 07:11 UTC≈1,230 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1 декабря 1962 года "хрущевская оттепель" резко кончилась в момент посещения Никитой Сергеевичем выставки в Манеже, приуроченной 30-летитию МОСХа (Московского отделения Союза художников), на которой были представлены работы тех, кого сейчас справедливо называют "вторым авангардом": Юло Соостера, Владимира Янкилевского, Бориса Жутовского и Владислава Зубарева, Элия Белютина. Генсек сокрушался: "дерьмо" "говно" "м

11😁9🔥2👍1🗿1🤯1

12 Feb 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,020 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ай да погружаться в четверговое философствование вместе с арт-группой ХЕЛЕНУКТЫ, что унаследовала принципы европейского дадаизма и настроения русского футуризма. Экая туча зловредная злонравная черноцветная чернозёмная на небо выпорхнула эка как она летает меж высоких облаков! на небо выпорхнула губами присвистнула туча зловредная яма зловонная пальцами прищё

5🤔3😁3🔥2🍓1🤯1

11 Feb 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,130 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Антанас Суткус. Вильнюс, 1984 Всем опаздывающим на работу.... посвящается ну и как это понимать? ⚡

19👏2👻2🍓1🔥1

10 Feb 2026, 09:39 UTC≈1,250 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эдгар Дега. Работы разных лет "И пусть будет потерян для нас тот день, когда ни разу не пля­сали мы!" • Фридрих Ницше ну и как это понимать? ⚡

14👍10🍓4

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kak_ponimat_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Feb 2026, 08:16 UTCAnonymous Poll197 voters

Согласны ли Вы с Хрущевым?

  1. Да, лютая "мазня" и "говно"!37%
  2. Нет! Вы не понимаете цимис Авангарда!36%
  3. Черт его знает, гулял по первому этажу, смотрел на "Мишек в сосновом бору"27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 26 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ну и как это понимать?” (@kak_ponimat_art), 6,067 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kak_ponimat_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.