Channel
@kaix_in
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
518subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001037603752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kaix_in |
| Created | 1 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kaix_in |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 518 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 517 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 519 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 519 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
哈哈抱歉我又在唬妳们了。标题太大而我想说的事其实很小，只是发现人的关注点会有这样的分别而已；而且，这种分别并不总是泾渭分明：比如我吧，就总希望女儿尽情享受——甚至挥霍——人生，但同时，反思时发现自己思绪里有太多「死后会怎样」的考虑。本身如此矛盾，自然也就无从说孰是孰非、熟优孰劣。或许完全就是庸人自扰吧。 前阵子一直在我咖啡馆里尝试放手让店长掌管一切，却反而搞得自己有些疲惫，或许也是出于这个纠结。咖啡馆已经开了 18 年，因为在意莫名其妙... 《生前事，身后事》 https://kaix.in/2026/0727
Signed 话唠的小助手
345a 苏格拉底说，特拉需玛科啊妳倒是畅快淋漓，但是我们并没完全听懂，好心的妳啊，还是得像我们再解释一下；别担心，妳对我们这些人做好事不会像妳所说的那样因为做了正义的事就吃亏的。但是特拉需玛科说，我说了妳也不信，我可不说了。 我心想，苏格拉底说的话不就已经证明了特拉需玛科其实是错的吗，他对我们做正义的事，而我们并不会让他吃亏；但是转念来想，如果我们的感激——而不是付钱——对他来说就是吃亏呢。嗯，看来这种论证还是太浅薄，我还是闭嘴听苏格... 《第一卷 04》 https://kaix.in/2026/0712/345a
Signed 话唠的小助手
339a 特拉需玛科说，正义就是统治者的利益，因为统治者当然也就是强者，不难推论，正义就是强者的利益。 苏格拉底这时候说了些我有点听不明白的话，他说特拉需玛科自己说利益却不让苏格拉底说利益——我想应该是翻译措辞的问题吧，我们一路读来，苏格拉底也没说什么利益啊，泛读嘛，先不查资料了，我猜大概是有利的、有用的、好的、利益，这些词在原文语言中有共通性，所以前面苏格拉底他们论证出来的正义之少应该是有用的、有利的、好的。特拉需玛科不让他们这样说，... 《第一卷 03》 https://kaix.in/2026/0712/339a
Signed 话唠的小助手
333a 波策马尔科说，在和平中，正义也是有用的，苏格拉底没有反驳而是顺着引导他继续得出结论：不同于医生和舵手那样特定场景才能派上用场，农夫、皮匠，在平日里也是有用的，他们要收获庄稼备制鞋子。进而又提出问题，正义呢，在平时它能满足什么需要达到什么目的？波策马尔科说，正义除了战争中有用，平日里的契约和事务往来上也有用。 这里其实我有些不太满意，可能古时的人们生活场景比现代生活要简单得多，更愿意接受这种类比，而现代人聊天时如果做这种类比来讨... 《第一卷 02》 https://kaix.in/2026/0712/333a
Signed 话唠的小助手
327a 开篇伊始，是一段唠家常1。苏格拉底和格劳康一起去海港看完祀神节庆典，当地人波策玛尔科一伙跑来留客说：知道妳们正要回家，但我们人多势众，妳们争不过我们的，就听我们的留下来吧，和我们这些人聊聊天，何况晚上还有通宵晚会呢。苏格拉底也没再多推辞。整体气氛算是融洽。 327c 一行人来到了波策玛尔科的家里，见到了他的一大家子人，以及别的一些朋友。波策玛尔科的老父亲凯帕洛，头上戴着一个花冠——不知怎么，我脑海里希腊人的样子就该是这样的——... 《第一卷 01》 https://kaix.in/2026/0712/327a
Signed 话唠的小助手
多年前第一次读《理想国》也是囫囵吞枣，但是依然十分喜欢——不知道是因为它把一些我边读边想到的问题和反驳都一一做了解答，让我产生了和两千年的人在对话的愉快感受；还是那种为求准确翻译而稍显繁琐的句式，让我得以暂时摆脱现代汉语，体验另一种可能性。 我始终羡慕那些博览群书的人，小时候，渴望自己一夜之间读完所有名著，但是慢慢不得不接受，有些事，只能日拱一卒。这一次重读，当然我还是没有能力读得精细，还是泛读而已。再次体验阅读的乐趣，以及，享受被时间... 《泛读《理想国》》 https://kaix.in/2026/0712
Signed 话唠的小助手
我讨厌「配料表干净」这个新近流行起来的说法。人们发现什么「好用」就一定要把它用到烂似的，发现这个宣传点好用，任何商品就都一下子变成了配料表干净了。不管真假、不管产品特性，一律配料表干净。只有浓缩苹果汁的苹果汁到底叫不叫配料表干净呢？再配合上其它伎俩比如名字叫 NFC 而不是真的 NFC，不但配料表不干净，人心也十分不干净。 ... 《配料表干净》 https://kaix.in/2026/0701
Signed 话唠的小助手
向 AI 模型提问：地球上曾经生活过多少人？动画闪烁，三秒钟之后，模型回应：地球上大约生活过 1170 亿人。模型很快。而且，我们甚至都无法确切知道模型反馈过程的每个瞬间，到底完成了哪些具体事务。分词、嵌入、多层注意力……上千亿个参数，到底如何影响着输出结果？ 在漫长的时间长河里，人类经历的、感怀的、各种思想和肉体的碰撞、随机性、必然性……意义，我想，每个个体永远都无法知其全貌。这一切——对人类来说是碌碌终其一生——或许在更高维度的生命... https://kaix.in/2026/0617
Signed 话唠的小助手
我订阅的几个博客都参与了这个问答，我也来参与参与。 How was your first experience with AI models? Do you use AI or are you completely against using it? Do you have any preference among different models, for example Claude vs ChatGPT? If yes, how ... 《AI 博客问题挑战》 https://kaix.in/2026/0609
Signed 话唠的小助手
在读《米德尔马契》的时候时常感觉有些吃力，所以其实断断续续读了好久了，还没读完。今天突然胡乱在想，这到底为什么呢？于是又拿来翻了翻。 比如说第一卷第三章开头吧，陈锦慧译本： 如果卡索邦真的觉得多罗西娅适合当他的妻子，那么她接受他求婚的理由已经埋植在她脑海里。 项星耀译本： 要是卡苏朋先生真的考虑过，布鲁克小姐是他合适的妻子，那么，促使她接受这门亲事的理由，确已埋进了她的心底…… 英文原文： If it had really occurr... 《咬文嚼字》 https://kaix.in/2026/0603
Signed 话唠的小助手
前有网络流行文化把长句缩短，生造成「梗」；后有 LLM 靠连词、副词堆叠，拼凑出所谓的逻辑和情绪。一缩一放，准确没了、意味没了、美感没了，心也没了。 ... https://kaix.in/2026/0602
Signed 话唠的小助手
我时常庆幸自己还不必为父母的健康担忧；但是昨天去我妈家的时候，她问我「你身体还好吧」的时候，我一时语塞。随即意识到：健康问题肯定已经在她的生活中占很大比重，而我自己也到了需要被这样关心的年纪了。人的身体真是个累赘，但也是这个累赘让人与世界连结。 ... 《妈妈的问候》 https://kaix.in/2026/0523
Signed 话唠的小助手
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kaix_in. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KAIX.IN” (@kaix_in), 518 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaix_in.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.