يا غايبٍ عن عيني ووصلك بعيد ما غاب طيفك لو تغيب المسافات يمرّ ذكرك على القلب مثل العيد وأضحك لجل لا تفضح العين عبرات أخفي شعوري لين صار قلبي عنيد وأقول عادي والغياب له احتمالات لكن سوالف ليلتي لك تعيد كل الطريق اللي طوته الذكريات إن جيت حياك يالغلا من جديد وإن غبت يبقى لك بقلبي علامات .

Channel
خالِدإلبلوي .
@kahld22
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,426subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001479598243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kahld22 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kahld22 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 1,426 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 1,431 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 1,432 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:47 | 1,432 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 20 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.19%
- avg views ÷ 1,426 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 74.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (20 August 2024 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 74 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 33s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
يراود الذاكره طيفك لا هب الحنين واليا ذكرت النصيب احاول اتجاهلك ضيعت من عمري وعمرك اربع سنين استاهل الحزن لاني كنت متساهلك والحين انا وين . . وانتي يالغالية وين خذاك غيري وانا اكثر شخص يستاهلك .
سنابي الجديد الاول طار نهائي حياكم https://www.snapchat.com/add/rkiiic?share_id=MyApDW8VSuONtN1QTmn7gw&locale=en_SA@calendar=gregorian
السلام عليكم
اوعدك كان حضوري مسبب لك ازعاج بوعدك واغيب . . والغي حضوري ماني فاتح باب قلبي . . للاحراج ولا احب اكون لانسان ماني ضروري ببعد وانا ادري ماورى بعدك . . علاج والهجر والله ماهو من دواعي سروري .
كنت اعتبر زلاتك الي مرت كلها طيش الين اكتشفت ان كل ابوها . . لعانه يمكن إني اسامحك للملح .. والعيش لكني ماعاد اتقبلك للحقيقه وللامانه .
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @kahld22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TEFLAZM1 · 37,859
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خالِدإلبلوي .” (@kahld22), 1,426 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kahld22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.