Channel
@kafiniger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,131subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001829642806 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kafiniger |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kafiniger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 1,131 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 1,131 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,021 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• Tr de @ 📝Directions Vidées📝 La guerre au Burkina Faso « s'est repliée » vers le nord ? Les changements dans les tactiques des militants opérant au Burkina Faso sont clairement visibles en comparant la géographie de leurs attaques au cours des deux dernières années. Si en 2024 et dans la première moitié de 2025 les islamistes radicaux du groupe « Jamaat Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin » menaient des opérations dans t…
• Tr de @ 📝Écart technologique📝 La composante sans pilote du conflit au Burkina Faso Comme nous l'avons rapporté précédemment, les drones sont devenus une partie intégrante non seulement des opérations de frappe, mais aussi des activités de reconnaissance et de recherche de l'armée du Burkina Faso. Au cours des quatre dernières années, l'armée de l'air du pays a été équipée de drones turcs Bayraktar TB2 et Bayraktar…
Niamey 🇳🇪❤️ 23 juillet 2026, 6h 16mn, température 25°C, ciel couvert, fine pluie par endroit.
"À qui reviennent les bénéfices ? Au Mali, on frappe les combattants, mais lesquels ? Nous avons déterminé où les frappes sont menées, mais la question clé est qui exactement est méthodiquement éliminé par les forces aériennes maliennes en collaboration avec des spécialistes russes. La carte des cibles donne une réponse claire à cette "situation". Le "leader" incontesté du classement négatif est le "Groupe Nusrat a…
⬇️⬇️⬇️
🇧🇫❤️✊️
❤1👍1
Bref aperçu des drones utilisés par les terroristes au Mali Selon un membre de l’Africa Corps russe, ces derniers utilisent notamment des Mavic 4 Pro et des drones lourds multirotors Baba Yaga, initialement développés pour les besoins de l’agriculture. Certains composants de ces drones sont fournis par l’Ukraine. @calibrearmes
• Tr de @ 📝Guerre des drones📝 Sur la confrontation dans les cieux du Niger Au cours de l'année allant de juillet 2025 à juillet 2026, le Niger est effectivement entré dans l'ère de la « guerre des drones » : les aéronefs sans pilote sont devenus simultanément l'arme clé de l'armée et un nouvel outil de pression pour les groupes militants. La base de la composante de drones des Forces armées du Niger est constituée …
Les plus grandes batailles ne se gagnent jamais contre les autres. Elles se gagnent dans ce lieu invisible où un homme choisit, en pleine conscience, de devenir celui qu'il prétend être. Kafiniger ✍️
• Tr de @ 📝Opérations de frappe des Forces armées du Niger et de ses alliés📝 Une année d'intensification opérationnelle Au cours d'une année — de juillet 2025 à juillet 2026 — les Forces armées du Niger et les forces alliées ont mené une série d'opérations consécutives dans le pays qui sont devenues le principal instrument de pression sur deux groupes en guerre : l'« État islamique dans la province du Sahel » et « J…
Il y a des documents que l’on conserve sans savoir qu’un jour, ils deviendront les témoins silencieux d’un parcours. Ce témoignage, reçu en 1998, compte parmi les premières reconnaissances qui ont jalonné ma vie professionnelle. À l’époque, je ne pouvais évidemment pas savoir où me conduiraient les années, les responsabilités, les rencontres, les réussites, les difficultés et les apprentissages. Près de trente ans …
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kafiniger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Djibrilla MahamadoulKafi” (@kafiniger), 1,131 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kafiniger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.