Et tout cela sans oublier les preuves précédentes dont vous pouvez retrouver une partie ici : https://t.me/kachfussitar/321 Mais malgré cela, les suiveurs des sa'âfiqah s'efforcent à propager de 'Arafât de plus en plus comme si de rien n'était et à nous répéter "il n'y a aucune preuve"....

Channel
Kachfou as-Sitar - كشف الستار
@kachfussitar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
1,185subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001406048392 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kachfussitar |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kachfussitar |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 1,185 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 1,186 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 1,187 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:50 | 1,187 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 47s
- Average length
- 42s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Que dites vous de 'Alî Al-Houdhayfî aujourd'hui, ô vous qui l'avez mis en avant hier pour propager vos troubles ? Ou bien comme à votre habitude, dès que les choses ne sont pas en votre faveur, vous êtes silencieux en espérant qu'on oublie... Vous qui imposiez à tout le monde de se positionner dans cette fitnah en prétextant le secours de l'opprimé, où est cette ardeur aujourd'hui lorsque ce sont ceux qui étaient da…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Il est important de rappeler que 'Alî Al-Houdhayfî était une référence pour les francophones suiveurs des sa'âfiqah : Ils ont organisé des cours réguliers avec lui, l'ont fait participer à leur séminaire, et ont traduit et propagé plusieurs de ses écrits et réfutations. ➡️
Où sont-ils aujourd'hui ? Eux qui prétendaient que ces gens étaient victimes d'injustice et imposaient aux gens de prendre leur défense ! Que disent-ils d'eux maintenant qu'ils dévoilent leur ancien acolyte 'Arafât ? Comme à leur habitude, ils sont silencieux sur ces sujets, espérant que les gens oublient...
Photo, posted without a caption
Rappelons également que ces personnes qui critiquent 'Arafât aujourd'hui furent mises en avant par les prédicateurs francophones signataires du bayan. Ils avaient notamment organisé un séminaire dans lesquels ces trois individus sont intervenus. ➡️
Fawwâz al-Madkhalî a partagé ceci : 《Quant aux méthodes dignes de "bandes organisées", cela ne fait qu’accroître notre clairvoyance à votre sujet.》 Le cheikh 'Alî al-Hudhayfî al-Sharafî al-'Adanî
La chaîne de cheikh 'Alî al-Hudhayfî al-'Adanî : 《Dernière demande: Dis au docteur 'Arafât al-Muhammadî qu’il n’est pas nécessaire de mobiliser une équipe de travail pour fouiller dans les anciens propos des étudiants en science afin, par ce biais, de démolir les étudiants en science et les prédicateurs. Qu’il soit courageux, qu’il cesse les manœuvres en sous-main/en dessous de la table et qu’il affronte les autres…
《Des comportements puérils, du désœuvrement/de l'inactivité, l’attisement des troubles, la provocation, la légèreté, et le fait de jouer avec les esprits et les cœurs des étudiants débutants en science afin de les détourner de la vérité — et de ta réalité… etc. Tout cela fait partie de certaines de tes actions et de tes agissements, ô docteur 'Arafât, ainsi que de ceux qui sont derrière toi.》 Son Éminence le cheikh …
🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸 Que se passe-t-il chez les sa'âfiqah ? Voici que ceux qui se soutenaient hier se déchirent aujourd'hui. Une fois de plus, des gens dont 'arafât fesait les éloges hier se retrouvent aujourd'hui à le critiquer et dévoiler ses méthodes. Ce qui ne fait que confirmer les propos du Chaikh Mohammed Ibn Hadî à son encontre.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kachfussitar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,605 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
https://twitter.com/Kachfussitar
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZk8yNXHv2cumLD6-p_5uTQ
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kachfou as-Sitar - كشف الستار” (@kachfussitar), 1,185 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kachfussitar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.