Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kachfou as-Sitar - كشف الستار

Channel

Kachfou as-Sitar - كشف الستار

@kachfussitar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

1,185subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406048392
TypeChannel
Username@kachfussitar
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kachfussitar

Growth

1,1851,1871,1868 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,186 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,185 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,185–1,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:371,185-1
11 Aug 2026, 12:081,186-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:001,187no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:501,187first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 47s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

27 Dec 2025, 21:54 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 8 August 2026

Et tout cela sans oublier les preuves précédentes dont vous pouvez retrouver une partie ici : https://t.me/kachfussitar/321 Mais malgré cela, les suiveurs des sa'âfiqah s'efforcent à propager de 'Arafât de plus en plus comme si de rien n'était et à nous répéter "il n'y a aucune preuve"....

27 Dec 2025, 21:40 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 8 August 2026

Que dites vous de 'Alî Al-Houdhayfî aujourd'hui, ô vous qui l'avez mis en avant hier pour propager vos troubles ? Ou bien comme à votre habitude, dès que les choses ne sont pas en votre faveur, vous êtes silencieux en espérant qu'on oublie... Vous qui imposiez à tout le monde de se positionner dans cette fitnah en prétextant le secours de l'opprimé, où est cette ardeur aujourd'hui lorsque ce sont ceux qui étaient da

27 Dec 2025, 21:35 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 8 August 2026

Il est important de rappeler que 'Alî Al-Houdhayfî était une référence pour les francophones suiveurs des sa'âfiqah : Ils ont organisé des cours réguliers avec lui, l'ont fait participer à leur séminaire, et ont traduit et propagé plusieurs de ses écrits et réfutations. ➡️

27 Dec 2025, 21:32 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 8 August 2026

Où sont-ils aujourd'hui ? Eux qui prétendaient que ces gens étaient victimes d'injustice et imposaient aux gens de prendre leur défense ! Que disent-ils d'eux maintenant qu'ils dévoilent leur ancien acolyte 'Arafât ? Comme à leur habitude, ils sont silencieux sur ces sujets, espérant que les gens oublient...

27 Dec 2025, 21:31 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 8 August 2026

Rappelons également que ces personnes qui critiquent 'Arafât aujourd'hui furent mises en avant par les prédicateurs francophones signataires du bayan. Ils avaient notamment organisé un séminaire dans lesquels ces trois individus sont intervenus. ➡️

27 Dec 2025, 21:31 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Fawwâz al-Madkhalî a partagé ceci : 《Quant aux méthodes dignes de "bandes organisées", cela ne fait qu’accroître notre clairvoyance à votre sujet.》 Le cheikh 'Alî al-Hudhayfî al-Sharafî al-'Adanî

27 Dec 2025, 21:30 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

La chaîne de cheikh 'Alî al-Hudhayfî al-'Adanî : 《Dernière demande: Dis au docteur 'Arafât al-Muhammadî qu’il n’est pas nécessaire de mobiliser une équipe de travail pour fouiller dans les anciens propos des étudiants en science afin, par ce biais, de démolir les étudiants en science et les prédicateurs. Qu’il soit courageux, qu’il cesse les manœuvres en sous-main/en dessous de la table et qu’il affronte les autres

27 Dec 2025, 21:29 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

《Des comportements puérils, du désœuvrement/de l'inactivité, l’attisement des troubles, la provocation, la légèreté, et le fait de jouer avec les esprits et les cœurs des étudiants débutants en science afin de les détourner de la vérité — et de ta réalité… etc. Tout cela fait partie de certaines de tes actions et de tes agissements, ô docteur 'Arafât, ainsi que de ceux qui sont derrière toi.》 Son Éminence le cheikh

27 Dec 2025, 21:29 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸 Que se passe-t-il chez les sa'âfiqah ? Voici que ceux qui se soutenaient hier se déchirent aujourd'hui. Une fois de plus, des gens dont 'arafât fesait les éloges hier se retrouvent aujourd'hui à le critiquer et dévoiler ses méthodes. Ce qui ne fait que confirmer les propos du Chaikh Mohammed Ibn Hadî à son encontre.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kachfussitar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,057,605 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kachfou as-Sitar - كشف الستار” (@kachfussitar), 1,185 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kachfussitar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.