10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,581–10,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 12:16
10,592
-4
16 Aug 2026, 05:23
10,596
-7
14 Aug 2026, 16:16
10,603
-16
13 Aug 2026, 08:37
10,619
-7
12 Aug 2026, 07:23
10,626
-7
11 Aug 2026, 08:23
10,633
-7
10 Aug 2026, 08:22
10,640
-14
9 Aug 2026, 11:51
10,654
-8
8 Aug 2026, 08:08
10,662
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:16
10,666
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
58.0%
avg views ÷ 10,592 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,150
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
23 (15 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
86,070
Reactions total
873
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,340
Videos
≈136
Links
≈1,210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,367 reactions across 23 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
496
36.3%
custom 5312067353293364833
338
24.7%
🔥
133
9.73%
custom 5213147732411166227
120
8.78%
😈
110
8.05%
custom 5271502933370870911
55
4.02%
custom 5461098492216752942
35
2.56%
custom 5215725958329282459
20
1.46%
custom 5370874247373660919
20
1.46%
💅
19
1.39%
🦄
12
0.878%
custom 5215484976304236801
9
0.658%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 23 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kabinet_lydika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мне вот интересно , когда закончится коррекция хайтира - неужели ещё настолько много красных скинчиков на руках , из которых иногда рождается очень дорогая голда или это просто усталость/негатив ? 📉📉
На самом деле будет интересно взглянуть на осеннюю так скажем ежегодную движуху - как она будет протекать при условии что за это время габен не накосячит ещё с чем то , привнеся любую новую шизомеханику - окончательно з…
Я очередной фермер , который вложил единицу+ деревянных в это ебаное казино и будет побрит - или всё таки грамотный баклажан , который всё правильно сделал и будет лутать котлетку на детище ГЕЙба ?💵💵
Физически это мясо я поставил к бабуле в дом , там очень бесплатное электричество получается и этот фактор я в учет не беру - осталось только обучить ее собирать виртуальный урожай и следить за моими мальчиками в катке✔…
Что мертво - умереть не может😊😊
Прямо сейчас , новейший , восхитительный Vacnet от вольвы вскрыли как консервную банку - чем поделился Репачино , очень древний пиарщик читов для кс🪩🪩
В результате этого - читеры дефают читеров прямо в бетке👏👏
Апплодирую стоя этим гениям , это то , что габен заслужил , закрывая глаза огромное количество лет на нормальный античит и порождая подобное комьюнити любителей подсматривать …
В этих ваших интернетах проклятых и *тематических форумах* где сидят клутые трейдеры и светилы рынка со стажем две недели инвестирования в атрибутику Кологне 2026 - активно педалировали масс выход с рынка кс2 таких медиек как Спарклс , Heyzeus итд по списку со скринами их внешек и скинов , что находятся на продаже 🛍🛍
Но спешу напомнить - что все эти товарищи , являются и являлись всю дорогу активными как трейдерами …
Настолько тихо на рынке и в медиаполе инвеста по кс2 что охото заинвестить в стендоф или другой калл - даже страшно немного от таких мыслей💩💩
По ферме - сейчас идет этап реги акков и настройки компов , скоро чуть поделюсь первыми шагами и расскажу по затратам шекелей + фин ожиданиям😁😁
Ждем сентябрь или смерть рынка в вечной стагнации ?
Завтра в 19:00 по мск бахнем освежающий летний стримчик на триче - я вернулся и хочется пощекотать себе нервы не самыми дешевыми контрактами обмена на топовое золото + новые красные и розовые ганы из коллекций Спай и Арабеска , кейсами и капсулами - достаточно давно замышлял некоторые заходы и будет интересно посмотреть что дадут💵💵
К тому же разыграем в Батлухе глочек Полный Раскрас с чистым флотиком - один из зрило…
Пока я исследую чайну на факт наличия тут интереса к рынку кс2 и фермам - пена полирует мой болт проект в сбоксе😁😁
Лутер/шутер по мотивам одной из первых игр серии Баттл Рояль h1z1 , сессионка с очень понятной и простой целью - дать всем пизды и выйти с топовым лутом с карты , который апскейлит перса и даёт варик залутать скинчики за реальные бабки💵💵
Найти можно легко - просто забив во внутригровом поиске EXITONE ,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @kabinet_lydika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 982,646 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КАБИНА” (@kabinet_lydika), 10,592 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kabinet_lydika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
