актуальное инфо пока на основном канале ▸ ▸ ▸ ссылка на инфо-пост
💘2

Channel
@k1saki_perehod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001958647137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @k1saki_perehod |
| Description | art cr: venoku.art (inst) |
| Created | 1 October 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/k1saki_perehod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 8 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 8 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 1 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 13 | 68.4% | |
| 👾 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 10.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2023 to 12 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
актуальное инфо пока на основном канале ▸ ▸ ▸ ссылка на инфо-пост
💘2
🦌я в играх , можете добавлять ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤменя в друзья 💙 ꒰ 🤡 ꒱ Genshin 🔵720418695 🔵 ꒰ 🗿 ꒱ Honkai: SR🔵700586303 ⚪️ ꒰ 🤩 ꒱ Roblox 🔵K1ra_Akkerman ⚪️ ꒰ 👩 ꒱ Arknights: EF🔵 6359322642 ⚪️ ㅤ играю сейчас - 🔵; нет - ⚪️
💘3👾2🕊1
кто вы? 🎀
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
‧ㅤ ▏𝘮𝘺 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘴 🌟 𝘩𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘴 - 𝘢𝘭-𝘩𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘮 ; 𝘗𝘞𝘎𝘰𝘰𝘥 ; 𝘥𝘺𝘭𝘢𝘯 ; ▏ 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘨𝘪 ▾ 𝘢𝘭-𝘩𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘮; 𝘢𝘭𝘣𝘦𝘥𝘰 ; 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘳 ; 𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘪 ; 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘵 ; 𝘢𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 (𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘳) ; 𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘭 ; ▏ 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘩𝘴𝘳 ▾ 𝘤𝘢𝘦𝘭𝘶𝘴 ; 𝘲𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘲𝘶𝘦 ; 𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘰𝘭𝘧 ; ▏ 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘫𝘫𝘬 ▾ 𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘶 ; 𝘺𝘶𝘵𝘢 𝘰𝘬𝘬𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘶 ; 𝘫𝘶𝘯𝘱𝘦𝘪 𝘺𝘰𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘰 ; 𝘮𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘰 ; ▏ 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘭𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘧𝘥 ▾ 𝘥𝘺𝘭𝘢𝘯 ; 𝘭𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘬𝘢 ; 𝘑𝘋𝘏 ; 𝘭𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘫𝘩𝘰𝘯 / 𝘫𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘬𝘢 ; ▏𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥 ▾ 𝘗𝘞𝘎𝘰𝘰𝘥 (𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘳&𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳) ; 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘉 (𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘳&𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳) ; 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘻 (𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘳
👾1
‧ㅤ ▏𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰 - 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘦 - ᴋиᴄᴀᴋи 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘦 - он/ᴇᴦо, нᴀ "ʙы" (хоᴩоɯо общᴀᴇʍᴄя/ʍью/дᴩузья - нᴀ "ᴛы") 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 - ϶диᴛы, хᴇдᴋᴀноны, ᴀу, ᴀᴩᴛы, ᴩᴇндᴇᴩы 𝘧𝘥𝘴 - 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥, 𝘩𝘰𝘺𝘰 𝘨𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘴, 𝘦𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘤𝘺𝘵 ▏𝘵𝘨 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴 - 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯 - @kissakii 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 - @k1saki_port 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘴 - @picrew_makers ▏𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘴 - пинтерест - kira_akkerman тик-ток - kira.akkerman ▸ 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰 ▏ 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘸! ‧ㅤ
💘4👾1🕊1
Channel name was changed to «🫧 Инɸ᧐ | k1ra.akkerman»
꒰💦꒱ я в играх , можете добавлять меня в друзья 💙 🗿 геншин ⚪️720418695 🗿 хср⚪️700586303 🤫 хи3д⚪️ 😎 реверс⚪️ 403212951 ✨ бравл ⚪️GJGL2CJ90 🫡 WuWa ⚪️600512510 ✨ ZZZ ⚪️1500545068 👀
💘4
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @k1saki_perehod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
кто вы? 🎀
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2023 to 12 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@k1saki_perehod named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🫧 Инɸ᧐ κɪઽɑκɪ (kira.akkerman)” (@k1saki_perehod), 8 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k1saki_perehod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.