новый блог🐈⬛ https://t.me/+h4WXpjjWIQxlZTJi

Channel
k1rx blog
@k1rxblog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
44subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002673115279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @k1rxblog |
| Created | 31 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/k1rxblog |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 15:14 | 44 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 46 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 48 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 49 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 49 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 31 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
349 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 124 | 35.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 46 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5355047688024901698 | 39 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5355128008208304859 | 37 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5355021020572962395 | 26 | 7.45% | |
| custom 5407003039821219840 | 21 | 6.02% | |
| custom 5361585474357985890 | 15 | 4.30% | |
| custom 5354836306914462164 | 14 | 4.01% | |
| custom 5355165984309136168 | 13 | 3.72% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.15% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 1.15% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.86% | |
| custom 5354856836858138486 | 2 | 0.573% | |
| custom 5354985531258195403 | 1 | 0.287% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 357
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 10 we hold a reading for · 80%
- Most on one post
- 250
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @k1rxblog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 March 2025 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
на 20 реакций возвращаю тгк
🔥45💯3❤🔥2
@hasler171 реакций и подписку кому не сложно
custom 53550476880249016989
File, posted without a caption
custom 535504768802490169812custom 53550210205729623955custom 53615854743579858904
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 535502102057296239519custom 53551280082083048597custom 53615854743579858907custom 53551659843091361683custom 53548568368581384862custom 53550476880249016982
😈🙂😈
custom 540700303982121984021custom 53551280082083048597custom 53551659843091361686
https://t.me/boost/k1rxblog
custom 535512800820830485920custom 53550476880249016987custom 53548363069144621646❤🔥3custom 53551659843091361681custom 53615854743579858901
https://t.me/+mvU8L4L2dXcxODFi 😈🙂😈
🔥51❤🔥17custom 53548363069144621645custom 53550476880249016984⚡2custom 53549855312581954031custom 53551280082083048591custom 53551659843091361681
Всех с первым днём лета❤️🔥🥷😈
❤🔥22🔥8❤4custom 53550476880249016983custom 53551280082083048592custom 53551659843091361682custom 53615854743579858902custom 53548363069144621641
Всех приветствую в своём новом тгк ОНЛИ ЛАЙФ
🔥20⚡2❤🔥2custom 53548363069144621642custom 53550476880249016982custom 53550210205729623951
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @k1rxblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“k1rx blog” (@k1rxblog), 44 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k1rxblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.