🤣2026冲刺🤣2026冲刺🤣 🥰需要海外平台的可以看一下 接代理 接公司 接团队 接飞单 🥰ST7外汇综合盘(产品有:外汇、合约、秒合约、美股、矿机、)可做秒合约 合约 🥰数字货币交易所盘(合约、发售、币币交易等) 代理后台可控秒合约 👑招东南亚及全球各地大佬代理🙂↕️ 👌合作条件90%起步 资金自管配有全球直通车通道👌 😏😏多名技术客服专员24小时在线配合 🥰以上盘子挂你钱包地址资金安全有保障 一对一服务群 隐私安全 😃联系方式恒升: @SA78899

Channel
柬埔寨大事件 🅥 新闻曝光🇰🇭
@jvjvjv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
33,855subscribers
-2,448 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002271282254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jvjvjv |
| Description | 本频道专注于华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 💎 投稿爆料: @bwmvp 何时葡萄先熟透,你要静候再静候 何时功成与名就,你要静心再静心 #东南亚 #亚太城 #妙瓦底 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 #迪拜 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jvjvjv |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 33,855 | -922 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 34,777 | -316 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 35,093 | -166 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 35,259 | -200 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 35,459 | -338 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 35,797 | -273 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 36,070 | -233 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 36,303 | first reading |
Engagement
173 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.519%
- avg views ÷ 33,855 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 176
- 173 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.948%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 173
- of 173 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 173 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 173 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,417 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈17,200
- Videos
- ≈5,010
- Links
- ≈9,620
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 38m 08s
- Average length
- 54s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 173 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#老挝资讯:万象市开展专项突击行动 多名涉网犯罪嫌疑人被抓获 初步消息,8月15日,老挝万象市西科塔邦区开展了一次针对网络犯罪活动的专项执法行动。 行动期间,公安部特勤人员对多个重点场所展开突击检查,其中包括位于湘江市场附近的华业酒店,以及农阳村的华美达酒店。执法人员现场对涉嫌参与网络犯罪活动的相关人员进行调查,并依法采取抓捕措施。 据了解,此次行动中,执法人员成功控制多名目标人员,并现场查获部分涉案物品。目前,案件相关情况仍在进一步调查核实中,后续处理结果有待有关部门公布。 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
轻信“缅北高薪赚大钱”陷入电诈团伙,因业绩不达标遭暴力惩罚 一名男子轻信“缅北高薪、轻松赚大钱”的虚假宣传,被诱骗进入电诈团伙。进入窝点后,不仅被迫从事诈骗活动,还因“业绩不达标”遭到团伙成员暴力惩罚,处境十分危险。 警方及相关机构多次提醒,所谓“缅北高薪工作”“轻松赚大钱”往往暗藏诈骗和非法拘禁等风险。切勿轻信陌生人的高薪诱惑,更不要为了所谓的“快速致富”冒险前往高风险地区。 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
#币圈资讯:币安发布公告表示,为配合监管要求,包括 HTX、EXMO、ABCeX 等多家交易所,被列入不再处理相关交易名单。 他们建议用户,避免通过币安直接或间接,向以上几家转入或接收资产,如继续尝试,账户可能会被审查或冻结。 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
#马来西亚资讯:吉隆坡“黑警讹钱”曝光 穿着制服,不是为了执法,而是盯着外国人钱包下手?网传个别执法人员涉嫌借着查证件、盘问、临检等名义,故意刁难、施压恐吓,最后把话题绕到一个字——钱。不给钱,就继续耗;不给钱,就不断吓;不给钱,就想办法给你“找问题”。 如果这些爆料最终属实,那就不是普通执法争议,而是有人把警察身份当成了赚钱工具,把执法权变成了“收费权”。 人在海外碰到这种情况,最忌讳当场硬碰硬。记住警员编号、车牌、时间、地点,能录音录像就留证,聊天记录、转账记录全部保存。该投诉投诉,该举报举报。警服是用来保护人的,不是用来讹钱的。执法权更不是谁拿来发财的筹码。 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
#群友爆料:泰缅边境大型诈骗园区“瑞当尼”,也称“新天地园区”。 目前园区内人数约1700人左右,加上缅甸当地服务人员以及后勤人员,总人数大约在2200人左右。 园区内部安保森严,基本上每隔10米左右就有一名保安巡逻。园区内中国人、越南人居多,目前大约有10个小公司。其中,C1、C2办公室被认为是最黑的区域。 打骂、体罚只是最基本的手段,员工多次向物业反映情况后,不但没有改善,反而变本加厉。这些公司主要从事国内精聊盘口业务。 相关管理人员包括:老板:阿健。大主管:罗峰。主管:阿吉、川杰。后勤:阿生。组长:阿勇、小胡、阿墨、土炮、阿乐、大东(曾在“大魔神”出来)。你们继续作恶,不是不报,只是时候未到。 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
#柬埔寨资讯:柬方强烈抗议!指泰方再次在争议地区向民众分配土地,柬泰边境土地争议再次升温。 据柬埔寨媒体8月15日报道,柬埔寨方面对泰国有关部门近期再次在Chouk Chey村相关区域向泰国民众分配土地的行为提出强烈抗议。报道指,这已经是泰方在该区域进行的第二轮土地分配行动。 柬方坚持认为,Chouk Chey村相关区域属于柬埔寨领土,因此泰方在当地进行土地测量、划分以及向民众分配土地等行为,涉嫌侵犯柬埔寨的主权和领土完整。 事实上,Chouk Chey村此前已经成为柬泰边境争议的敏感地点之一。今年1月,柬埔寨提交联合国的相关文件中,也将Chouk Chey村列入柬方声称遭泰军控制的区域,并对泰方有关行动提出抗议。 柬埔寨方面强调,将继续通过外交及相关国际机制处理边境争议,并记录有关情况作为证据,同时要求泰方停止在争议区域采取可能进一步改变当地现状的行动。 目前,柬泰双方对于部分边境地区的主权归属仍存在明显分歧,双方各…
#巴基斯坦 拉瓦尔品第被围园区后续报道。 ⚠️调查出现重大转折,官员称从中国和越南公民身上搜出与中国和越南警察制服。 当局正在调查这些制服为何会出现在他们手中以及可能的使用方式。 ps:国内军包 这种回去基本上不会低于2年刑期 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
😀🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓 平台旗下无私彩 平台旗下无私彩 平台旗下无私彩 平台旗下无私彩 #全网累计已上押1000万U打造全球顶级线上娱乐城 始终坚持“用户至上,专业为本的运营理念力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 优势:😁 新人首存🥰最高可送 😁🥹🥹🥹🥹 优势:🥹 输赢千万从不卡款,出款备用金 😁😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣 优势:🤣 月福利每月3号全站发放 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 优势:😂 庄、闲一念间,好彩天天送 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 📣 大哥在PG电子爆出了25万元人民币喜提款成功 👉👉👉👉👉👉 📣 大哥800元进3个胡疯狂爆分 充值4000U提款 😭😣😤😖😖😠 📣 恭喜大哥麻将胡爆出35万人民币 喜提 😀😀😀😀😀😀 📣#CQ9电子 #跳起来 大哥充值2100RMB爆走 😠😣😣😣😣😣😖 ⚡️⚡️挑战全网最高首存赠送比例!首存多少就送多少!不为赚钱只为交朋友! 旗下平台无…
🇻🇳 非法入境买假身份 中国男子获刑五年半 8月14日,越南胡志明市人民法院审理了一起伪造证件及行受贿案。40岁中国籍男子董建于2021年非法入境越南,后支付5万元人民币通过中间人并贿赂越南前公安人员,伪造聋哑病历及出生证明,将假名“裴文豪”录入人口数据库,顺利骗领越南身份证。 法院以使用伪造证件罪和行贿罪判处董建有期徒刑5年6个月。协助其伪造身份的两名同伙及三名涉案前公安人员也分别被判处1年至4年3个月不等的有期徒刑。 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
#国内资讯:300多部手机24小时轮番群发,江西警方端掉3个“引流车间” 江西丰城警方近日打掉一个专门为境外违法犯罪团伙和黑灰产业提供引流服务的团伙,抓获徐某某等5人,捣毁3处非法信息发送窝点,现场查获手机300余部、手机卡120余张及一批作案工具。 警方调查发现,徐某某等人大量收购二手手机和手机卡,搭建可以同时控制数百部手机的发送平台,利用苹果iMessage批量向国内用户推送“网络赌博”“色情推广”“代开发票”等引流信息。 这些信息通常附带链接,诱导接收者点击并下载涉诈App,再将人员引向非法网站、群聊或后续诈骗环节。 为逃避封堵,这个团伙频繁更换手机卡和苹果ID,安排设备24小时轮换发送。3处窝点内,大量手机长期保持充电和开机状态,形成规模化“引流车间”,不断向外群发垃圾信息,其中还包括“高赔率博彩”“日结刷单”等内容。 警方掌握团伙人员和窝点位置后,刑侦大队联合孙渡派出所展开集中收网,同时突入3处窝点,将正在操…
#网友爆料:中国人老板,名字阿涛,拖欠工资不发。 在南邓、梦拉、孟波都有他的公司。在孟波开聊感情公司的,南邓的公司在58会所过去一点那个锦泰酒店,全部楼都是他的诈骗员工。 锦泰酒店也是他的产业,但是用的是合伙人的名字。锦泰酒店楼下的火锅店也是他的产业,也是用他的合伙人名字。阿涛拖欠工资不发,已经三个月了,一直说明天给,都没有给。要是还不发,我们就直接举报到佤邦单位。再给你3天时间,不发直接去举报。 国内我们也有人,到时候直接抓回国。你的照片,不要逼我曝光出来。能定你的罪的证据老子也有。到时候自己坐牢,不要说老子没有给你时间。 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ➡️ @JvJvJv 投稿:@bwmvp
Showing the 12 most recent of 173 posts we hold for @jvjvjv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 590,623 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alham · 1611 post@androgel
@androgel · 141 postbandile
@bandile · 311 post@Bill_gates
@Bill_gates · 161 post@Bokeor
@bokeor · 11 post@CiniMinis
@ciniminis · 31 post@entisar
@entisar · 581 post@everdale
@everdale · 21 post@gomba
@gomba · 81 postiBroo
@ibroo · 1581 postnot og
@igejeie8888 · 341 post@Jeff_Bezos
@jeff_bezos · 301 post@Kelay
@kelay · 351 postnurdin
@nurdin · 1681 post@Purpled
@purpled · 21 post智慧天下联盟🪼一键投放
@txppt · 1,6981 post@ughty
@ughty · 1221 post@yefikir
@yefikir · 771 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@jvjvjv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨大事件 🅥 新闻曝光🇰🇭” (@jvjvjv), 33,855 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jvjvjv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.