Channel
@juveatrestelle
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
134subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001059717481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juveatrestelle |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juveatrestelle |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 134 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 135 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 135 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 96.3% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2022 to 6 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Disarmante che la FIGC penda dalle labbra di chi dichiara apertamente di odiare la #Juventus e di essere "DA PM ANTIJUVENTINO", avendo il preciso intento di affossare una sola squadra.
https://www.juveatrestelle.it/the-last-dance/
Chiaramente questo è un addio. Parlare con voi di Juventus negli ultimi 10 anni è stato appassionante e divertente, anche se a volte frustrante. Grazie a chi ci ha seguiti e chi ha sacrificato un po' del proprio tempo per collaborare con noi, peccato che sia finita così 🖤🤍
Gravina sul tema plusvalenze: "Mi è stato ricordato che sono state raccolte dalla stampa nel corso degli ultimi mesi mie dichiarazioni riguardati il tema delle plusvalenze. Ecco, a tal proposito voglio precisare che io da una parte ho l’assoluta convinzione che la plusvalenza, in ogni settore imprenditoriale, sia un obiettivo da conseguire e così anche nel calcio e in questo senso sono le mie dichiarazioni pubbliche …
https://www.juveatrestelle.it/i-vivi-e-i-morti/
https://www.juveatrestelle.it/adios-pipita-vecchio-cowboy/
👍3👎1
Come tutti, ci domandiamo se sia sostenibile una situazione che vede costantemente penalizzata una squadra, attraverso l'utilizzo strumentale e scientifico del VAR. Per quanto tempo ancora? È credibile un sistema congegnato in evidente malafede? #JuventusSalernitana
👍4
A Roberto Renga piaceva molto parlare di calcio e di vita. Lo ringraziamo per essere stato un nostro amico e averci concesso un pezzetto del suo tempo. Lo ricordiamo con affetto prima come uomo e poi come professionista di altissimo spessore. Ciao Roberto.
👍14
https://www.juveatrestelle.it/la-juve-che-sara/
👍1
#Juventus: i dati raccolti da Ciccio Di Castri sul campionato di Serie A dopo la prima giornata.
https://www.juveatrestelle.it/lanima-dello-stadium/
🗣 Stando al comunicato ufficiale della Juventus, la cessione di De Ligt porta nelle casse della società 67 milioni più 10 di bonus al raggiungimento di determinati obiettivi sportivi. Valutando la singola operazione, considerando i vari Grealish & C., ovviamente non posso che giudicarla in modo negativo, visto che stiamo cedendo uno che in quel ruolo rappresenterà con tutta probabilità il non plus ultra per il prossi…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @juveatrestelle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Juveatrestelle.it” (@juveatrestelle), 134 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juveatrestelle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.