Channel
@justlessy_about_bot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
242subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002107436747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justlessy_about_bot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justlessy_about_bot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 242 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 245 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 246 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 246 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5265118842442511379 | 20 | 83.3% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 8.33% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔧 Индивидуальная консультация: настроим твоё сообщество ВК за 1 час Персональный созвон в ВК (1 час), где разберём именно твой случай Что можно успеть за час: → Оформление: обложка, аватарка, визуальная концепция → Воронка подписчика: меню, виджеты, статьи, структура → Функционал: ВК Донат, «Моё время», товары/услуги, чаты, полезные фишки → Ответы на твои вопросы — если что-то не влезает в час, дам чёткий план, что…
😎 Запускаю услуги по оформлению и видеомонтажу ✔️Ознакомиться с прайсом и услугами ✔️Подписаться на сообщество
custom 52651188424425113795✍1
‼️‼️‼️‼️ Канал закрыт 🔕 ✈️Меня можно найти: В ТГ @justlessy (лайф-канал) В ВК https://vk.com/justlesy (лайф-сообщество) И пока оставлю рабочее сообщество в ВК ⚡Я всё ещё курирую телеграм-ботов (не волнуйтесь, все схвачено) Также оформляю сообщества в ВК, создаю картинки и инфографику под заказ, монтирую видео. Со всеми вопросами можете приходить в личные сообщения @justlesy Проект "Автоответчик" тоже продолжит ра…
✍1
Telegram отмечает аккаунты, которые используют альтернативы Telegram Абонент использует неофициальный клиент Telegram. Это может снизить защищённость переписки с пользователем Мне неуютно будет писать в личку, а вам?
custom 52651188424425113793
На голосовые сообщения теперь можно отвечать на конкретную фразу: "Ответить с тайм-кодом" Телеграм сам отмечает на каком моменте вы слушаете и на что именно отвечаете
🙏2
И еще несколько обновлений 👇
custom 52651188424425113792
Ещё обновления: 1. ИИ помогает писать тексты 2. Новые возможности в опросах Пойду разбираться, а вам предлагаю поделиться в комментариях: Что уже попробовали?
Новое форматирование: Дата Внезапно обнаружила, что теперь в текст можно вшить не только ссылку, но и дату с точным временем. Указываете дату, время, и фраза будет светиться как ссылка, но при нажатии на неё появится выбор: 1) копировать дату 2) добавить в календарь 3) задать напоминание Теперь можно с уверенностью приглашать людей на свои мероприятия, не опасаясь, что кто-то забудет о них. Telegram позаботился о т…
custom 52651188424425113793
Вышел на прогулку и потерял клиента Такой страх постепенно набирает обороты у тех, кто теряет доступ в Telegram, отключаясь от Wi-Fi. Да и на домашнем интернете дела идут так себе. Как можно себя обезопасить? 1. Telegram дал своим премиум подписчикам возможность отправлять подготовленные сообщения из состояния «не в сети». 2. Мы пошли дальше, сделали автоответчик. Вы можете настроить ответы на конкретные «слова-тр…
Ну прелееесть 😍 Посты про вк можете почитать тут и тут
custom 52651188424425113791
Хочу читать...
The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Научиться замечать красоту в повседневности, прислушиваться к себе через фотографию и создавать альбом моментов, которые говорят о вас Продолжение популярного фото-челленджа на тему "Весна и переход" Стоимость — 300 рублей Старт 1 марта! → Принять участие
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @justlessy_about_bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хочу читать...
The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 561,158 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алессия в IT” (@justlessy_about_bot), 242 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justlessy_about_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.