Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Justf News

Channel

Justf News

@justfNew

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,594subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001247836792
TypeChannel
Username@justfNew
Created12 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/justfNew

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5931,6001,596.56 August 2026 — 1,600 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,600 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,598 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,597 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,595 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,600 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,599 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,596 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,595 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,593 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,594 subscribers1,5946 August 202617 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,592–1,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:001,594+1
13 Sept 2026, 14:591,593-2
4 Sept 2026, 09:401,595-1
26 Aug 2026, 00:041,596-3
22 Aug 2026, 16:561,599-1
19 Aug 2026, 03:271,600+5
16 Aug 2026, 08:381,595-2
13 Aug 2026, 00:381,597-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:021,598-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:321,600no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:261,600first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😇1653.3%
🥰413.3%
🥴413.3%
😁310.0%
❤13.33%
🤣13.33%
🤯13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC223 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#碎碎念 也是凹到42秒了,感觉01别礼这个就是极限了,https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1i5MB6dEmA/ 这个轴自己打才知道42秒多极限,得凹全程不吃任何伤害,敌人全程都在打队友,开局看见大红圈就得直接重开了,最后别礼开大那里底下还得放汤汤战技补伤害

1 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC601 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#碎碎念 我不行了,笑飞了 https://b23.tv/BV1KZGu6BEgC

🤣1

10 Jul 2026, 03:02 UTC815 viewsread 7 August 2026

#碎碎念 最近在看雪绘的神探狄仁杰re,这还是我知道的炮仗吗,怎么变成好娇娇了

3 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#碎碎念 我草我才看到山新和皇受也离婚了……

🥴4🤯1

23 Jun 2026, 03:48 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#碎碎念 你家也不做接地,哎😑电🐔警告

21 Jun 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,160 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#碎碎念 最有含金量的major冠军

🥰1

3 Jun 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#碎碎念 看AI写calibre插件都看力竭了,真是一场酣畅淋漓的赤石啊,赞美AI

27 May 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#碎碎念 不是?啊?什么东西😧情报居然是真的

7 May 2026, 06:34 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 7 August 2026

#碎碎念 没有人可以拒绝石头门!没有! https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1UqdFBpEFL

23 Apr 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#碎碎念 ColorOS 历经5年,终于把修改图标的时候图标包无法加载全部图标的bug修了,哦咩爹多😇

18 Apr 2026, 04:56 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 7 August 2026

#碎碎念 剧情音乐人物塑造都是超大杯,让我缓缓,最后哭死我了

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @justfNew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Justf News” (@justfNew), 1,594 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justfNew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.