Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Серёга, разберись!

@just_solve_it

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,980subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001677005380
TypeChannel
Username@just_solve_it
DescriptionКак превращать свои навыки в офферы от $4000 на Глобал рынке. → Чем могу быть полезен: https://t.me/just_solve_it/278 → Обсудить ваш запрос: @GrowGlobalPro 💌 Отзывы @londerenReviews
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/just_solve_it

Growth

5,9806,0185,9997 August 2026 — 6,018 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,017 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,980 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,974–6,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:225,980-37
7 Aug 2026, 21:366,017-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:026,018first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 21 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 5,980 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (21 April 202511 August 2026)
Views total3,946
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
282

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

598 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19332.3%
🔥16727.9%
12621.1%
👀132.17%
❤‍🔥122.01%
🏆111.84%
👏101.67%
🤣101.67%
91.51%
💯71.17%
50.836%
😁50.836%
👎40.669%
🥱40.669%
🤩30.502%
🥴30.502%
🍌20.334%
😭20.334%
😱20.334%
🤓20.334%
5 further kinds81.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @just_solve_it. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2025 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC716 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Запилил скилл для написания промптов Собран по всем канонам того, как кошерно писать промпты для Claude на базе философии системных промптов Fable 5 и Opus 5 Именно с его помощью писал вторую версию промпта по оформлению Линка. Почему "Клод, напиши мне промпт…" — хуита. Он напишет только тематически: разделы О продукте, О тоне, О команде. А LLM промпт не читает линейно, она дергает его на каждом сгенерированном то

🔥117👀3👍2

10 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,110 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤡 Профиль, на который не стыдно вести людей Коннекты из прошлого поста сами по себе вам работу не принесут. Они делают другое: чем больше сеть, тем чаще вы попадаете в поиск, когда hr ищет кандидатов. Вы попадете в поиск, только если в профиле стоят те слова, по которым вас ищут, например у вас в хедлайне Software Engineer, а hr вбивает в поиск Golang Developer и выпролетаете с входящими от рекрутеров У меня есть п

🔥8👍5🏆21

4 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,120 views29 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥18👍5🤩3👏21

27 Apr 2026, 14:14 UTC≈4,640 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хватит учить английский — пора на нем говорить Типичная ловушка "сначала подтяну англ, потом начну собесы". И так уже полгода сидишь, задрачиваешь грамматику, слушаешь подкасты, но рот открыть страшно. Разочарую, C1 разработчику не нужен. Интервьюеры сами часто не носители, а индусы, сербы, арабы. У них англ такой же кривой, как у тебя. Никто не ждет калифорнийского акцента, ждут, чтобы тебя было понятно. А как то

25👍8🔥52🤨1🥴1

16 Apr 2026, 13:22 UTC≈4,370 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

США vs Европа. Где искать работу в Tech в 2026 Давно хотел сравнить США и Европу по живым цифрам, вот что получилось по итогам рисерча. 🩸 США Минус 12 000 рабочих мест в Tech за февраль, за год минус 57 000, аналитики говорят, что хуже было только во время краха доткомов в начале нулевых. Компании режут джунов и мидлов под оптимизацию с AI, сейчас туда реально запрыгнуть только сеньорам с опытом в AI и облаках.

👍14🔥7🤔2😭2🥴1

10 Apr 2026, 14:09 UTC≈4,080 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤔 Повангуем: что будет с разработчиками через 2-3 года Обсуждали с учениками перспективы AI и зашли далеко, предлагаю и тут поразгонять. 💯 Джуновскую работу AI уже делает: фиксит баги, пишет компоненты, собирает страницы. Синьор + три агента = маленькая команда. Реальность США: людей увольняют, а потом нанимают тренировать AI делать их же работу. За копейки, на аукционной системе, где ты сидишь на нервной кнопке 2

👀9👍4🤣4🤓2🤯21🥱1

7 Apr 2026, 15:11 UTC≈4,320 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Через 2 месяца в Европе вступит в силу закон, который ломает одну из самых токсичных игр в найме С 7 июня все страны ЕС обязаны внедрить Директиву о прозрачности зарплат. Схема "зарплата по результатам собеседования" начинает разваливаться, к концу 2026 года 94% компаний будут раскрывать вилки при найме. ✊ Что меняется 👌 Компания обязана назвать зарплатную вилку до первого интервью. Не "зависит от опыта", а нормал

👍32🔥167👏5👎2😁1

10 Mar 2026, 15:09 UTC≈5,210 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Фреймворк для собесов о котором не знают 99% кандидатов (нет, это не STAR) STAR знают все, и это его проблема. Он дает структуру, но не дает энергию, ответы звучат как отчет: была ситуация, была задача, сделал то-то, получил результат. Корректно — и абсолютно не запоминается, поэтому HR в своих заметках напишет "кандидат ничем не выделялся" и перейдет к следующему. А что люди запоминают? Конфликт, напряжение, драму

🔥20👍7🏆3🥱32🍌2

4 Mar 2026, 15:07 UTC≈4,390 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

📹 Стрим завершен, благодарю всех, кто пришел и задавал вопросы ⭐️ Несколько избранных тем со стрима: 9:45 — ATS: как нестандартная верстка ломает парсинг резюме 19:45 — Возраст в резюме: скрывать или нет — и почему 23:52 — Главная ошибка: два резюме в одном — нужно делать отдельные 48:00 — Что нужно, чтобы выйти на международный рынок — главный фактор 1:06:00 — Зарплатные ожидания: указывать или нет — почему это лов

🔥71🥴1

4 Mar 2026, 08:21 UTC≈3,950 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📹 Live: прожарка ваших резюме, сегодня в 18:00 МСК Что будет: — Возьму присланные резюме и разберу их вживую. — Покажу, на что реально смотрят рекрутеры и нанимающие менеджеры. — Разберу типичные ошибки, которые убивают конверсию в приглашение на собес. — Дам конкретные рекомендации, которые сразу дадут результат в конверсии. Как попасть в разбор: 💯 Приготовьте свое резюме в формате PDF 🔝 Скиньте его в комментарии

🔥7🏆32👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @just_solve_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Серёга, разберись!” (@just_solve_it), 5,980 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/just_solve_it.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.