Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дневник Инженера 🏗

Channel

Дневник Инженера 🏗

@just1engineer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,065subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001777050488
TypeChannel
Username@just1engineer
DescriptionМаксим Федотов. Инженер-конструктор Рассказываю о проектировании и строительстве, обучаю расчетам и конструктиву Сообщество: t.me/+X62qEKwAAk1hMTMy Курс "База инженера" t.me/Predzapis_Baza/30 Группа ВК vk.com/just1engineer (рекламу не размещаю)
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/just1engineer

Growth

14,06514,09314,0797 August 2026 — 14,084 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,084 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,088 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,089 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,090 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,093 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,091 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,088 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,087 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,086 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,090 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,087 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,085 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,082 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,075 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,070 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,071 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,074 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,067 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,065 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 22 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,061–14,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 18:4214,065-2
28 Aug 2026, 20:1514,067-7
27 Aug 2026, 19:0714,074+3
26 Aug 2026, 18:0914,071+1
25 Aug 2026, 15:5314,070-5
24 Aug 2026, 15:4314,075-7
22 Aug 2026, 20:2714,082-3
21 Aug 2026, 11:0414,085-2
20 Aug 2026, 11:5814,087-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:0414,090+4
18 Aug 2026, 17:2414,086-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:1614,087-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:2714,088-3
15 Aug 2026, 06:1514,091-2
14 Aug 2026, 00:2814,093+3
12 Aug 2026, 17:1614,090+1
11 Aug 2026, 14:2214,089+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:0114,088+4
7 Aug 2026, 17:1614,084no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:0814,084first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 14,065 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held9 (4 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total1,630
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
375
Videos
24
Links
99

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
39m 32s
Average length
19m 46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

262 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9034.4%
🔥4918.7%
👍4617.6%
🤯166.11%
134.96%
🤔103.82%
93.44%
💯83.05%
🤝72.67%
62.29%
❤‍🔥31.15%
💔31.15%
👌10.382%
🫡10.382%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,630 views33 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Всегда ли строить - это созидать и создавать? Думаю, что не всегда, ведь, когда имеется уже сложившаяся застройка, то так или иначе приходится ради нового жертвовать старым (список утраченных памятников архитектуры Москвы). И хорошо, если это какие-то пустыри или заброшенные промзоны, и на их месте появляются новые классные пространства, особенно когда они сохраняют историю. Но порой Вместо исторического здания появ

20👍6💯4💔3

16 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈4,720 views34 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Запись вебинара "Базовые инженерные ошибки" Ошибки, про которые знают и студенты, и начинающие, и опытные специалисты, но все равно продолжают их совершать. Поэтому еще раз их посмотреть, запомнить и постараться не совершать в будущем, будет полезно всем. 👍

🔥27🤝32👍2

12 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC≈6,440 views43 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

В центре Манхеттена ЧП! Во время реконструкции начали гнуться стальные несущие колонны небоскрёба - здания бывшей штаб квартиры Pfizer. Ведь были добавлены 16 новых этажей. Мы видим стандартную картину потери устойчивости сжатых элементов в сторону меньшего момента инерции. Конструкции начали усиливать дополнительными временными опорами (на 4 фото). У инженерного сообщества предположение, что застройщик поставил при

🤯16🤔109🔥42👍2

9 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC≈5,120 views19 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Всем спасибо! Запись вебинара будет позже🙌 Ну а успеть попасть на курсы "База инженера" и "База геотехника" по старой цене можно по ссылке: @Baza_Just_Engineer_bot (для доступа к курсу на платформе telegram) Либо на платформе GetCourse: Курс "База инженера" Курс "База геотехника" Отзывы и более подробная информация здесь 👇

🔥1232👌1🤝1

9 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈4,000 views15 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Как положение конструкции внутри или за МКАДом может влиять на ее армирование? И другие интересные случаи... Разберем на вебинаре уже сегодня: "Базовые ошибки инженера"! 🕘 Дата: 09.07.26 Четверг 🗓 Время: 20:00 мск 📍Место: Upd: запись будет позже.

10🔥4👍1

6 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC≈5,250 views51 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Порой кажется, что в основном инженерные ошибки случаются от незнания сложной научной теории, нелинейных расчетов, профессиональных программ. Но на практике оказывается, что многие ошибки в работе совершаются на уровне не то, чтобы университетских, а на уровне школьных знаний. Например умножить или разделить? Или как перевести килоньютоны в тонны и т.п. Возьмем те же расчеты в программах. Например, расчет в Plaxis

27👍173💯2🤝2

29 Jun 2026, 10:44 UTC≈5,700 views29 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Уже показывал то, что в свободном доступе в интернете сложно (или даже невозможно) найти актуальные нормативы. То есть последнюю версию изменения, которые выходят довольно часто. 📥 Либо можно найти только отдельный документ с изменением, с которым сложно работать, ведь надо сопоставлять кучу документов разных версий, и смотреть, какой пункт на что поменялся. Что конечно же странно, ведь требования СП и ГОСТов обяза

174❤‍🔥3👍2🔥2🫡1

5 Jun 2026, 06:04 UTC≈7,050 views32 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Выполним расчеты различных вариантов уголковых подпорных стен с одинаковой шириной подошвы, но с разным ее развитием: в сторону удерживаемого грунта, от нее и в обе стороны, но с преобладанием в сторону грунта, как в СП381. Получаем, что наибольший коэффициент устойчивости получается у подпорной стены, отрисованной по СП. И вот этому объяснение. Развитие фундамента в сторону грунта дополнительно пригружает фундамен

👍1694💯2🤝1

4 Jun 2026, 14:01 UTC≈5,220 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Фундамент подпорной стены развиваем в сторону:

  1. меньшей отметки20%
  2. большей отметки (удерживаемого грунта)80%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @just1engineer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jun 2026, 14:01 UTCAnonymous Poll518 voters

Фундамент подпорной стены развиваем в сторону:

  1. меньшей отметки20%
  2. большей отметки (удерживаемого грунта)80%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Проектирование зданий
@prozru · 43,324
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дневник Инженера 🏗” (@just1engineer), 14,065 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/just1engineer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.