Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for š—”š—¶š—”š—¢Ź³įµ‰įµĖ”įµƒįµ35šŸ’žšŸŒ¼

Supergroup

š—”š—¶š—”š—¢Ź³įµ‰įµĖ”įµƒįµ35šŸ’žšŸŒ¼

@julyat_gruop

On this record: Topic Ā· Growth Ā· Engagement Ā· Citations Ā· Cite this entry

1,438members

-31 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

20 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register Ā· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001510236903
TypeSupergroup
Username@julyat_gruop
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 September 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/julyat_gruop

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4381,4691,453.511 August 2026 — 1,469 members12 August 2026 — 1,468 members15 August 2026 — 1,467 members18 August 2026 — 1,464 members21 August 2026 — 1,461 members24 August 2026 — 1,460 members27 August 2026 — 1,459 members30 August 2026 — 1,457 members2 September 2026 — 1,455 members7 September 2026 — 1,452 members11 September 2026 — 1,446 members14 September 2026 — 1,443 members19 September 2026 — 1,449 members29 September 2026 — 1,449 members30 September 2026 — 1,438 members11 August 202630 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 50 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean ā€œno change observedā€, never ā€œinterpolatedā€. The vertical axis spans 1,433–1,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
30 Sept 2026, 08:191,438-11
29 Sept 2026, 02:251,449no change
19 Sept 2026, 14:371,449+6
14 Sept 2026, 21:411,443-3
11 Sept 2026, 11:421,446-6
7 Sept 2026, 02:171,452-3
2 Sept 2026, 16:571,455-2
30 Aug 2026, 10:121,457-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:141,459-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:171,460-1
21 Aug 2026, 04:471,461-3
18 Aug 2026, 10:271,464-3
15 Aug 2026, 06:431,467-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:141,468-1
11 Aug 2026, 10:531,469first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the ā€œNamed by N registered channelsā€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

ā€œš—”š—¶š—”š—¢Ź³įµ‰įµĖ”įµƒįµ35šŸ’žšŸŒ¼ā€ (@julyat_gruop), 1,438 members as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/julyat_gruop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Ā· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.