Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฑ.

Channel

๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฑ.

@jullwzxx

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

3,047subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001686903395
TypeChannel
Username@jullwzxx
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jullwzxx

Growth

3,0473,0843,065.57 August 2026 โ€” 3,084 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 3,084 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 3,077 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 3,065 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 3,058 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 3,047 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 3,041โ€“3,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:333,047-11
14 Aug 2026, 02:073,058-7
11 Aug 2026, 03:423,065-12
8 Aug 2026, 10:533,077-7
7 Aug 2026, 20:023,084no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:183,084first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
16.9%
avg views รท 3,047 subscribers
Avg views / post
515
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.58%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 May 2026 โ€“ 1 August 2026)
Views total1,029
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 36s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

843 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค26931.9%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ23427.8%
๐Ÿ’˜13015.4%
๐Ÿ”ฅ799.37%
๐Ÿ“455.34%
๐Ÿ˜354.15%
๐Ÿ’‹303.56%
๐Ÿ•Š212.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 843reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for ยท 25%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @jullwzxx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC326 views39 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

ะปะธ ะฒะพะฝ ะฟะพัะปะต ะดะฐะณะตัั‚ะฐะฝะฐ #ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ29โค6๐Ÿ’˜4

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

22 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC703 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿคฉ #ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ22โค9๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ“2

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

16 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC923 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ั ะธะผะตะฝะฝะพ ะฑะฐะปะดะตัŽ ั ัั‚ะพะน ะฐะฝะธะผะบะธ ะถะฐะปัŒ, ัˆะพ ะฟั€ะพัั‚ะพ ั€ะตะบะปะฐะผะฐ ะบ ะผะฐะฝะณะต #ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โค28โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ13๐Ÿ“10๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

10 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTCโ‰ˆ1,050 views45 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

๐Ÿ”ฅ24๐Ÿ’‹9โค8โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ˜2

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

9 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC944 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โค29๐Ÿ’˜10๐Ÿ”ฅ8โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

3 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTCโ‰ˆ1,090 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ25๐Ÿ’˜5๐Ÿ”ฅ5โค1๐Ÿ“1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

22 Jun 2026, 15:21 UTCโ‰ˆ1,270 views47 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

โ€” ะฟะพะฒะทั€ะพัะปะตะป ะฟัƒะบะธั #ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

๐Ÿ˜26๐Ÿ’‹9๐Ÿ’˜6โค5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

16 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTCโ‰ˆ1,310 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

โ€” ะฝัƒ ะบั€ะฐัะฐะฒะฐ, ะฝัƒ ะผะพะน #ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โค23โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿ“8๐Ÿ’˜1

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

15 Jun 2026, 15:51 UTCโ‰ˆ1,130 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โค18๐Ÿ’˜5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ“1

Signed ` ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’

14 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTCโ‰ˆ1,050 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โค23โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ’˜5

Signed ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’.

13 Jun 2026, 14:35 UTCโ‰ˆ1,020 views44 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โค24๐Ÿ’˜11๐Ÿ“8โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’.

12 Jun 2026, 16:24 UTC947 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ัะดะธั‚ ๐Ÿฅน tt

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ28๐Ÿ’˜8๐Ÿ”ฅ6

Signed ๐’‹๐’–๐’๐’.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jullwzxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,165,986 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฑ.โ€ (@jullwzxx), 3,047 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jullwzxx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.