Channel name was changed to «📗Книжная жизнь 🌿»

Channel
📗Книжная жизнь 🌿
@jullumos_books
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001223492296 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jullumos_books |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jullumos_books |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 88 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 87 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 87 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 71.3%
- avg views ÷ 88 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 62.8
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 28.5%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (8 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 565 |
| Reactions total | 161 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
268 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 154 | 57.5% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 16.8% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 4.48% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 2.61% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 2.61% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.24% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 2.24% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.746% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.746% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.746% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.373% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.373% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.373% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jullumos_books. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
"Дом моей матери" Ш.Франке. Кажется мама меня не любит или 8 пассажиров в семейном аду. Шари - старшая дочь Руби Франке. На первый взгляд, их большое семейство является воплощением американской мечты: родители, любящие друг друга, шестеро детей. Именно такую картинку мать семейства транслировала на своем ютуб-канале "8 пассажиров". Жизни ее детей были прекрасным способом монетизации, ведь за их повседневными видео н…
❤9😢4💔3🔥3😭2
Стив Кавана. Тринадцать. Воспоминание разблокировано. Лет **дцать назад, я обожала смотреть передачи по типу "Час суда", где перед лицом правосудия представали разные ситуации человеческого бытия. И, конечно, интереснее всего было искать виновного среди всех свидетелей. Ведь чаще всего любая из этих историй была не так проста, как могло показаться на первый взгляд. Стив Кавана пошел еще дальше. Кровожадный убийца в…
❤13👍2🔥2🥰1
Два тринадцатых. Два Каваны. Сейчас мои серые рабочие будни параллельно скрашивают две истории. Два Ирландца. Первая - детектив Стива Каваны "Тринадцать". Про актерство в жизни, стремление достичь желаемого любой ценой и про суд присяжных заседателей. Мне нравится, что главы называются днями недели, и я читаю понедельник в понедельник, вторник во вторник, и сегодня планирую успеть прочесть среду. И да, я уже готов…
🔥7❤6⚡2👌1🤔1
Всем привет, в группе сч сделала анонс на август ❤️ приходите читать хорошие книги вместе 😊 И присоединяйтесь к опросу по выбору книги Кати Качур 😍 сслыка на группу тут https://t.me/+eS8N5T8NjMw1YzQy
❤9👏3
Девушки, всем привет! Я к вам с анонсом будущих совместных чтений на август 😍 1. А. ВЕРГЕЗЕ "Завет воды" в первой половине августа 2. К. КАЧУР либо "Капля духов", либо "Желчный ангел" во второй половине августа Буду рада, если вы присоединитесь 🤗
❤7👏3
Возвращаться как всегда очень сложно. И слова не идут, и отзывы не пишутся. Уже которую неделю думала с чего начать, что сказать. Я ужасно соскучилась по вам. Как вы, мои дорогие читающие? 🫶
❤14🔥5👏1
В июне я вышла на работу, поэтому с книгами стала проводить меньше времени. 1) Прочла "Книгу воина света" Коэльо и хотела еще прочесть "Победитель остается один", да и другие его истории. Но потом планы поменялись 2) Послушала "Зацепить 13-го". Неплохо, но всеобщих восторгов не разделяю 3) Перечитала любимого "Мартина Идена". Люблю еще больше теперь. Отзыв получился на страниц 6... 4) Хотелось Кинга почитать, стараю…
❤14🔥5👍4
В мае получилось прочесть рекордное количество книг. Целых 10. Такие вот плюсы безработной жизни были))) 1) Насладилась магическим реализмом Павича. 2) Наконец-то дочитала бесконечное "Железное пламя" Яросс. 3) Погрузилась в тему "Выгорания" и поняла истоки этого состояния. 4) Атомные привычки уже второй раз забросила. 5) Финансовый анализ почти покорился, но тоже пока не до конца 6) Игра престолов была моей настольн…
❤13🥰4🔥3👏1
На календаре июль стремится к завершению, а я все еще не рассказала о прочитанных книгах Мая и Июня. Делюсь разворотами из своей читательской тетрадки и заодно своим ежемесячным ритуалом, но обо всем по-порядку. Я вспомнила почему так сильно люблю свой покетбук. Оказывается, мне сильно комфортнее читать электронные книги, потому что дома место уже заканчивается, а мои читательские аппетиты не поспевают за размерами…
❤11🔥5😍2👏1
Анонс совместных чтений ❤️ Старт 1 июля. Запасайтесь платочками и приходите читать волнующую историю в приятном обществе 💜 Ваше приглашение тут ⬇️ https://t.me/c/3069945070/1509 Приходите сами, зовите друзей 🤗 График чтения будет в группе.
🦄7💘6👾5
Пламенный привет тому одному человеку, что остался на канале) Как поживаете? Я решила, что нужно хоть как-то заявить о своем существовании, потому что чем больше откладываю, тем меньше хочется сюда возвращаться. Но я присоединяюсь к любимому марафону "Книжная школа", благодаря которому этот канал существует уже чуть больше года. А это значит, что посты будут! Хотя бы до сентября будет мотивация, чтобы продолжать рас…
❤17🔥7🌚2😘2💅1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jullumos_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,221,259 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📗Книжная жизнь 🌿” (@jullumos_books), 88 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jullumos_books.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.