Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Julibrary📚

Channel

Julibrary📚

@julibrary

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

168subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001776211067
TypeChannel
Username@julibrary
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/julibrary

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1681701697 August 2026 — 170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers27 August 2026 — 169 subscribers11 October 2026 — 168 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 65 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 06:20168-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:15169-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:15170no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:09170first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 1 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5664.4%
❤‍🔥1213.8%
👍910.3%
🥰44.60%
🆒22.30%
🕊22.30%
💔11.15%
💯11.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 20 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 7 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @julibrary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2025 to 20 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Apr 2025, 15:10 UTC487 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Христос воскрес! Опять с зарею Редеет долгой ночи тень, Опять зажегся над землею Для новой жизни новый день. Еще чернеют чащи бора; Еще в тени его сырой, Как зеркала, стоят озера И дышат свежестью ночной; Еще в синеющих долинах Плывут туманы… Но смотри: Уже горят на горных льдинах Лучи огнистые зари! Они в выси пока сияют. Недостижимой, как мечта, Где голоса земли смолкают И непорочна красота. Но, с каждым часом приб…

❤14🥰4🕊2

19 Mar 2025, 19:15 UTC445 views10 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️Если смотреть на этот роман просто как на сюжет о любви, то думаю, мало кому он будет интересен именно с этой точки зрения. Да, это не что-то банальное, даже, пожалуй, смелое и дерзкое, и тут действительно есть вещи, которые заставляют подумать. Но почему-то при чтении я постоянно вспоминала о другом английском откровенном романе, написанном намного раньше, аж в 1928 году, но, благодаря бдительности пугливых высоко…

❤‍🔥6❤3💔1

19 Mar 2025, 15:47 UTC318 views11 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Роман можно считать современным - он написан в 1969 году и наполнен множеством аллюзий на социальные и исторические явления этих лет, однако автор намерено помещает героев во времена викторианской Англии и дает им говорящие имена, создавая тем самым отсылку еще и к классическим произведениям английской литературы, как бы возводя мост между XX и XIX веками. И вот об это я почему-то постоянно спотыкалась: получалось, ч…

❤7❤‍🔥3👍1

19 Mar 2025, 15:26 UTC197 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚Все-таки бывают книги, которые вроде бы интересны, но предсказуемы, и не нравятся, и читаешь в итоге без удовольствия, но продолжаешь, жалея бросить… а потом понимаешь, что прошло так много времени, а мысленно к ним все еще иногда возвращаешься. Так я поняла, что хочу высказаться тут немного о романе «Женщина французского лейтенанта» Джона Фаулза. оцените молодую Мэрил Стрип в кадре из экранизации 1981 года ❤️ Не …

❤6❤‍🔥3👍1

9 Mar 2025, 19:35 UTC264 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А из внезапных книжных покупок у меня только «Псоглавцы» Алексея Иванова с автографом 🪶Удивительно и немножко грустно, что я сейчас больше читаю, чем покупаю книг (наконец-то!), а написать сюда пока даже и некогда, и нечего 😪 Начну «Псоглавцев», как только уйму все свои неожиданные медицинские интересы и рукоделия.

❤8👍2

9 Mar 2025, 15:05 UTC241 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚 Букинистический магазинчик Твери «Что делать?» Необходимо написать о нем уже наконец, иначе с каждым весенним днем зимние впечатления становятся все более неактуальными🤩 Мы посетили его еще в новогодние каникулы, и покупателей в нем было совсем мало. Кажется, мы бываем в Твери проездом сотню раз в год, но только в те долгие выходные каким-то чудом вообще обратили внимание на это красивое ветхое здание. Запах и ат…

❤8👍3💯1

1 Feb 2025, 20:16 UTC341 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😇Мне безумно понравился зал, посвященный русской иконописи, где буквально препарированы и рассмотрены под увеличительным стеклом техники рисования и способы нанесения, инструменты, стили, даже сохранившиеся пособия, образцы и примеры. Наверное, из всей экспозиции это оказалось самым удивительным и интересным для меня, но остальные залы заслуживают внимания тоже: в основном это мрачные живописи малоизвестных голландск…

❤10👍2🆒2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @julibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Julibrary📚” (@julibrary), 168 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/julibrary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.