Channel
@juliapetitte
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,310subscribers
-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001564879657 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juliapetitte |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juliapetitte |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 5,310 | -33 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 5,343 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 5,363 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 5,365 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 5,365 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (6 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,735 |
| Reactions total | 381 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
381 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 173 | 45.4% | |
| 🔥 | 95 | 24.9% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 13.9% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 6.30% | |
| 😍 | 24 | 6.30% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 2.10% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ловите нетривиальную стилизацию красного от бренда Tibi. В последнее время в соцсетях много одинакового стайлинга, одних и тех же приёмов, но чаще одних и тех же вещей. Чтоб не застревать в одном, лучше периодически выходить за пределы привычного инфополя, смотреть западные бренды, ну и Pinterest всё так же хорош.
❤19👍9🔥8
Ну и рубрика «луки-неделька». Сейчас не работаю, догуливаю лето и последние деньки в декрете с Катюшей. Скоро осень, садик и полноценное возвращение в стилистику. А пока луки максимально расслабленные и ненапряжные.
❤40👍10🔥4😍4
И ещё находки с богатой осенней фактурой. Давно лежит в сохранёнках сумка из меха пони от Ostin. Отличный, чуть драматичный багет, может стать базой, если не носите много вещей. То, что сумка до сих пор в наличии да ещё на скидке, для меня объясняется лишь тем, что вышла она в весенней коллекции, а меховая фактура – история про холодный сезон. Ну и балетки из искусственной каракульчи хороши за свою цену. Вполне себе …
❤21🔥6👍2
Мы уже давно хакнули систему в Модном вестнике и знаем, что можно сэкономить и купить модную пару в Lime для девочек. Эти четыре пары можно смело брать. Особенно, если у вас 34-й и 35-й.
🔥21❤9👍6
После летнего релакса возрождаю рубрики, и сегодня по плану покупочная пятница. Только сегодня хочется узнать о ваших шопинг-промахах, что вы купили и пожалели. Я профукала свои денежки на плетеный шопер Sela а-ля the Row. Моря этим летом не случилось, а для города он просто гигантский. И ещё недовольна белыми холщовыми кедами Vans. Почему никто не предупредил, что после каждого выхода их нужно стирать? Для меня та…
❤16👍5🔥4
Простой, но эффектный стайлтрюк показывает наш дружочек Endr из запретграма. Можно использовать вторым слоем не только тельняшку, но и любой лонг, главное, чтоб нательная футболка была не слишком over.
🔥19❤6👍5
Очень вовремя подошел новый дроп от Nereja со своим коронным леопардом, в этот раз пальто. Изучаем самый свежий стайлинг и самые хитовые вещи сезона: 🔴 мягкие дерби/джазовки 🔴 акцентные галстуки 🔴 бермуды 🔴 акцентные носки 🔴 ремни 🔴 пояс-кушак 🔴 crocо 🔴 юбки-тюльпаны 🔴 «футбольные» футболки Считаю аккаунт Nereja в запретграме учебником по стилизации для всех, кто интересуется модой.
😍20🔥12✍4❤2
Lime, кстати, повторили хитовый пиджачок прошлого сезона, который молниеносно разлетелся, но потом повылазил на Авито за оверпрайз. Добавили ещё одну расцветку для тех, кто уже не хочет ни Лео, ни рысь, ни тигру.
❤19👍5
Дизайнеры не просто не сбавляют обороты по звериному принту, а интенсифицируют его. Помню прошлогоднюю статью в американском Vogue о том, что леопард – это уже не акцентный принт, а база, и леопардовое пальто приравнивалось к бежевому или коричневому. Звериного принта из года в год становится больше, используют его смелее и уже почти на любых носителях: питон, зебра, лео, тигр у нас теперь не только в обуви и аксе…
❤21👍7🔥3
Кто хотел модные двуцветные лонги, но не за 10к? В Befree дают, считай, даром, успевайте. На Lamoda голубые почти разобрали, а вот оранжевые пока есть. Нюанс: посадка не свободная, а модная по фигуре.
❤19🔥5👍4
Я бы назвала эту съемку «Ozempic sucks”
😁24🔥13💯8❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @juliapetitte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,173,088 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Модный вестник” (@juliapetitte), 5,310 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juliapetitte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.