Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

До тіла - з турботою, до себе - з добротою

@julia_krilyk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,303subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001927500400
TypeChannel
Username@julia_krilyk
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/julia_krilyk

Growth

1,3031,3051,3047 August 2026 — 1,305 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,305 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,303 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,303–1,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:461,303-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:321,305no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:231,305first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 1,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total833
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

415 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27666.5%
🤯6415.4%
😁276.51%
👀174.10%
❤‍🔥71.69%
🤡71.69%
👍51.20%
🔥51.20%
🗿40.964%
😍20.482%
😢10.241%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 415reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC228 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дізналася сьогодні новий термін. Знали?

👀17

5 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC266 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привіт! 😊 Якщо вам знайоме постійне невдоволення своїм тілом, самокритика, думки про схуднення або відчуття, що життя почнеться лише тоді, коли ви зміните свою зовнішність, — хочу запросити вас на мій онлайн-інтенсив «12 кроків до здорових стосунків з тілом». Протягом місяця ми крок за кроком будемо працювати над тим, щоб: ✨ зменшити самокритику; ✨ навчитися по-іншому ставитися до свого тіла; ✨ перестати відкладати

7

25 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC339 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ALittleCareEachDayPhoto

Нагадування на сьогодні 🌺

27

15 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC600 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/ALittleCareEachDay Доєднуйтеся💜

10😍2

15 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC526 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Маленьке нагадування 💜

34

13 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC436 viewsread 7 August 2026

Можливо хтось може порекомендувати зі свого досвіду в більшій вазі 💜

13 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC492 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вибачте, що не по темі. Дуже актуальне питання для мене. Чи є ендокринологи, які не бояться пацієнтів з вагою ~200 кг? Які не пропонують оземпік або баріартрію не дізнавшись навіть аналізів та не поцікавившись чи є у пацієнта рхп. Вже відчай бере, якщо чесно. В місті взагалі немає спеціалістів. Онлайн прийоми та супровід або задорогі для мого бюджету, або відмовляються дізнавшись вагу.

11 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC504 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мені от цікаво, чи є тут люди, які відео дивляться на швидкості 1.0?) Бо я навіть себе слухати на цій швидкості не можу, здається, що я якась загальмована)) Лише 1.5 😁🙈 Увімкнула курс психіатра і розумію, що я точно не загальмована на відер, а просто що мій мозок вже очікує, що всі люди на відео мають говорити на ×1.5. 😅

😁233

10 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC518 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Маленьке нагадування 💜

28

7 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC648 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привіт) я сьогодні зняла новий інтенсив «12 кроків до здорових стосунків з тілом» (хто слухав лекцію 10 кроків, то він на основі лекції) Буде десь в середині серпня (можливо раніше, залежно як швидко монтажер змонтує) В інстаграмі в сторіс можна залишити «+», якщо тема актуальна і хочете доєднатися за найнижчою ціною. https://www.instagram.com/stories/julia_krilyk/3935926352824629494?utm_source=ig_story_item_share

15

18 Jun 2026, 20:39 UTC858 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Але я отримала насолоду 🥰 Хочу якийсь час попрактикувати Через голос, звучання, вібрування теж можна розслабляти нервову систему https://youtu.be/ETeYWBGfiso?si=uSTLoE4t4SaCOaCg Можливо хтось захоче теж спробувати)

16❤‍🔥6

18 Jun 2026, 19:51 UTC631 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сьогодні дізналася цікавий факт: близько 2–3% людей не здатні створювати уявні образи в голові — це стан, який називають афантазією. Такі люди не «бачать» подумки картинки, сцени чи обличчя, коли щось уявляють або згадують, хоча можуть знати й описувати це словами без проблем. Наприклад, вони розуміють, як виглядає яблуко або море, але не формують внутрішньої візуальної “картинки”. При цьому пам’ять, логіка та інтел

21👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @julia_krilyk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 May 2026, 18:36 UTCAnonymous Poll184 voters

Розмір грудей?

  1. Обидві одного розміру24%
  2. Одна не значно більша за іншу62%
  3. Одна значно більша за іншу14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,129,637 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“До тіла - з турботою, до себе - з добротою” (@julia_krilyk), 1,303 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/julia_krilyk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.