4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 694–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 19:36
696
+2
16 Aug 2026, 07:37
694
-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:17
697
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:55
697
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 696 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
15 (6 November 2025 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
193
Reactions total
40
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
218 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
45.4%
👍
45
20.6%
🔥
35
16.1%
😍
14
6.42%
💘
7
3.21%
😱
6
2.75%
🥰
4
1.83%
🍓
2
0.917%
🤩
2
0.917%
👏
1
0.459%
💯
1
0.459%
😢
1
0.459%
😨
1
0.459%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @juli_citrus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🙃 Когда работа заканчивается?
Многие скажут - после фотосессии готового интерьера.
Для меня - нет.
Самая ценная обратная связь приходит тогда, когда в доме начинают жить люди.
Недавно семья въехала в квартиру, которую я оформляла.
Уже на следующий день я получила голосовое сообщение.
Они рассказывали, что прекрасно спали. Что вечером ужинали в лучах закатного солнца. Потом смотрели фильм при приглушенном свете.…
🫨 Пожалуй, эти полгода стали для меня самым горячим периодом.
Настолько, что моя команда самостоятельно и очень достойно занималась проектированием, а я целиком погрузилась в реализации.
Реализация - так я называю процесс, когда идеи перестают быть красивыми картинками на бумаге и становятся настоящим пространством, в котором совсем скоро будут жить люди.
Мне было важно пройти этот путь самой. Не со стороны, а вну…
❤️🔥 ЖК Грин Парк - ремонт от застройщика, вот такая комната получилась для прекрасной девочки
#дизайнпроект #дизайнкомнатыдлядевочки #дизайндетской #жкгринпарк #дизайнинтерьера #дизайнеринтерьера
😇 Какие проблемы решает экспресс-проект?
Очень часто в квартирах от застройщика есть типичные сложности:
✖️одна люстра по центру комнаты
✖️розетки «не там»
✖️странная геометрия стен
✖️ощущение «как у всех»
✖️нет уюта
Мы:
✔️ создаём сценарии освещения (даже если вывод один)
✔️ продумываем хранение
✔️ добавляем глубину через цвет и текстиль, сочетание фактур
✔️ делаем интерьер индивидуальным
И самое главное - у…
🤔 Почему мы придумали эту услугу?
История моей сестры - это не просто случай, это настоящий квест, который мог бы стать сценарием для триллера!
Всё началось с того, что она купила квартиру с ремонтом от застройщика, надеясь, что не придётся тратить лишнее время и деньги на переделки. Но жизнь решила по-своему…
Вместо того, чтобы попасть в стильное и уютное жильё, её ждала целая серия неприятных сюрпризов. С самого…
🤔 Если у вас ремонт от застройщика, стоит ли переплачивать за полный дизайн проект?
Ремонт от застройщика или white box - пустое полотно, которое хочется сделать максимально функциональным, удобным и красивым.
Не всегда полный проект - это то, что нужно!
Особенно если у вас уже есть базовый ремонт или «white box».
❤️ Мы придумали решение, которое позволит создать стильный интерьер за короткое время и без лишних за…
🤩 Как задуманное становится реальностью?
Наблюдайте)
В марте 2025 года мы заключили договор на дизайн проект, прошло меньше года и мы на финишной прямой.
ЖК Симфония - приступаем к финишным отделочным работам и параллельно собираем мебель, очень торопимся…
У нас есть очень большой повод, какой?
Смотрите внимательно видео, а кто догадается, даю скидку 10% на разработку дизайн проекта 😇
Жду ваши варианты в коммент…
👀 А теперь интересно ваше мнение
Этот же интерьер, но в двух вариантах:
1️⃣ светлая версия
2️⃣ темная версия
В каком вам было бы комфортнее жить и ухаживать за пространством?
⬇️ голосуем ниже
P.S. кстати, обратили внимание насколько в функционале выигрывает вариант с темным кухонным гарнитуром?
🫡 Почему темный интерьер выглядит дорого — и почему не каждая хозяйка к этому готова
Темные оттенки в интерьере почти всегда дают ощущение глубины, статуса и продуманности.
Именно поэтому в этом проекте для квартиры под сдачу в премиальном ЖК Primavera мы сделали акцент на темной центральной зоне.
Но у такой эстетики есть важный момент, о котором редко говорят.
Темный интерьер — это не только про визуал, но и про …
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Signed Юлия🍊дизайнер интерьера Студия CiTRUS
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @juli_citrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интерьеры от Juli 🍊CiTRUS” (@juli_citrus), 696 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juli_citrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.