Channel
@judiciary_llb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,049subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001320706412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @judiciary_llb |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/judiciary_llb |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:48 | 1,049 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:11 | 1,047 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 1,051 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 1,052 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:30 | 1,056 | +2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:04 | 1,054 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 1,055 | +2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 1,053 | +3 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 1,050 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 1,044 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 1,044 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
As per Section 2(3), a "child" means any person below the age of:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
Under Section 2(2), how is "animal" defined in the Sanhita?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
According to Section 1(5), the provisions of the Sanhita apply to any person committing an offence outside India if they are targeting:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
Under Section 44, an opinion on relationship expressed by conduct shall not be sufficient to prove a marriage in proceedings under:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
According to Section 42, when the Court has to form an opinion as to the existence of any general custom or right, the opinions of which persons are relevant?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
Under Section 41, when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, whose opinion is relevant?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
According to Section 40, facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
As per Section 39, when the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law, science or art, the persons specially skilled in such areas are called:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
Under Section 38, any party to a suit may show that any judgment which is relevant and was proved by the adverse party was:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
According to Section 35, a final judgment, order or decree of a competent Court in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction is:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
Under Section 30, statements of facts in issue or relevant facts made in published maps or charts generally offered for public sale are:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
According to Section 28, are entries in books of account alone sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ASIF ALI
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @judiciary_llb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
As per Section 2(3), a "child" means any person below the age of:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under Section 2(2), how is "animal" defined in the Sanhita?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
According to Section 1(5), the provisions of the Sanhita apply to any person committing an offence outside India if they are targeting:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under Section 44, an opinion on relationship expressed by conduct shall not be sufficient to prove a marriage in proceedings under:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
According to Section 42, when the Court has to form an opinion as to the existence of any general custom or right, the opinions of which persons are relevant?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under Section 41, when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, whose opinion is relevant?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 14 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Indian Judicial Services Examination Preparation Aspirants Daily Law Quiz MCQ Bihar IPC Contract Tort” (@judiciary_llb), 1,049 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/judiciary_llb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.