Channel
@judicialwatch_mv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,170subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001235655087 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @judicialwatch_mv |
| Created | 23 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/judicialwatch_mv |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 1,170 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 1,180 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 1,185 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 1,186 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 1,188 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:14 | 1,188 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 1,189 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 1,190 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 1,193 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 1,196 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 1,198 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 1,201 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 1,203 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 1,208 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
319 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 298 | 93.4% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 6.58% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2022 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BREAKING: Records from the Virginia Department of Elections show the commonwealth cancelled 6,531 “declared noncitizen” voter registrations between June 2024 and June 2026. READ: http://jwatch.us/W5DQqL
👍4
New from Judicial Watch: Thirty Years Later, FBI Record Exposes a Missing Piece of the TWA Flight 800 Investigation. https://redstate.com/ben-smith/2026/07/23/thirty-years-later-fbi-record-exposes-a-missing-piece-of-the-twa-flight-800-investigation-n2204661
👍2
RESULTS: Judicial Watch lawsuits and settlements have led to the removal of 6 MILLION names from voter rolls nationwide.
👍9
BREAKING: Judicial Watch filed an Arizona Public Records Law lawsuit against Gov. Katie Hobbs for records regarding the costs and communications associated with her administration’s launch of a “Know Your Rights” web portal advising Arizonans on interactions with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal law enforcement officials. READ: http://jwatch.us/7mQjDW
👍6
Posted without readable text
“It is an outrage and insult to every American citizen, and may be a violation of federal law, that DC allowed 388 foreign nationals to vote in the 2024 general election. Congress can and should end this practice immediately,” @TomFitton in Just the News. READ: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/nearly-400-non-citizens-voted-dcs-2024-general-election-judicial-watch
👍20
“These documents disprove the FBI’s narrative that the spy operation against Catholics and churches was limited to one field office. In fact, the operation seems to have been approved by top lawyers in the FBI,” Judicial Watch President @TomFitton in Just the News. READ: https://justthenews.com/accountability/cancel-culture/house-expands-censorship-probe-youtube-block-fbi-whistleblower
👍12👎1
🚨 Is the Rule of Law threatened? @TomFitton thinks so. Judicial Watch president and bestselling author Tom Fitton is sounding the alarm in his latest book, "Rights and Freedoms in Peril." Key highlights from his new book include: • Exposing radical ideologies in high offices • Detailing threats to American institutions • Calling readers to action to preserve liberty Following his hit "A Republic Under Assault," Fitt…
👍16👎1
NEW Judicial Watch Weekly Update: “Ashli Babbitt Lawsuit Update!” READ: https://www.judicialwatch.org/ashli-babbitt-lawsuit-update/
👍19👎1
NEW Judicial Watch Weekly Update: “Secret Service Cover-Up!” READ: https://www.judicialwatch.org/secret-service-cover-up/
👍7👎2
🚨 Is the Rule of Law threatened? @TomFitton thinks so. Judicial Watch president and bestselling author Tom Fitton is sounding the alarm in his latest book, "Rights and Freedoms in Peril." Key highlights from his new book include: • Exposing radical ideologies in high offices • Detailing threats to American institutions • Calling readers to action to preserve liberty Following his hit "A Republic Under Assault," Fitt…
👍13👎1
NEW Judicial Watch Weekly Update: “Trump Persecution Update.” READ: https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-persecution-update/
👍14👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @judicialwatch_mv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“judicialwatch” (@judicialwatch_mv), 1,170 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/judicialwatch_mv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.