Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

全网骗子曝光📷套路骗局揭秘❗️

@jubao

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,981subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247328671
TypeChannel
Username@jubao
Description🛡【欧易担保曝光中心】 🔰上押公群: @oygq ✅供需频道: @oygx 🧧资源大群: @oydb 📬 投稿联系曝光负责人 @ag99 🤖 自助曝光机器人 @yanqun #全网曝光 #套路揭秘 #网友爆料 #骗子曝光 曝光所有骗子 保障您的资金安全!
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jubao

Growth

4,9815,0044,992.57 August 2026 — 5,004 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,004 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,981 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,978–5,007 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:024,981-23
8 Aug 2026, 05:515,004no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:325,004first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.31%
avg views ÷ 4,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held9 (1 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total2,379
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,340
Videos
187
Links
1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC156 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

PS:以上截图内“欧易担保”均为假冒 交易认准欧易担保永久四字用户名及短位+888号码👇 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

8 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

骗子用户名 @ah37899999 。找他买的棋牌透视软件,刚开始一直可以用,谈好的价格是一个月500u。用了几天他就又问我要钱。就是不停的要钱,然后还说不想跟我合作,最后把我钱拿了就拉黑我了 PS:交易一定要走担保!! 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

1

8 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC226 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

8 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC236 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

在电报上通过广告像用户名“鲲鹏”购买假钞,我轻信其欧易担保承诺下单购买。付款后对方以“厂家要求补单否则不发货且不退款”为由,诱骗我二次付款。随后提供两个单号,谎称到货后送货,并信誓旦旦保证取货无额外费用。快递签收后,对方又要求缴纳“保密保证金”才肯送货。我当即拒绝已知被骗,对方随后清除记录并失联。整个过程系典型连环诈骗套路:先以担保和群内好评建立信任,再以补单、保证金等名目反复收割,承诺全部为虚假话术,请广大网友警惕此类骗局,切勿轻信非正规交易。 PS:以上截图内“欧易担保”均为假冒 交易认准欧易担保永久四字用户名及短位+888号码👇 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

6 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC240 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

找骗子买的透视软件。谈好价格 一个月1000u。软件测试3天。测试满意了。然后群里面一直催促 下押押金。我这边下押了。然后第五天 软件就不能用。被关停了。然后问什么原因。故意说服务器升级 要加钱。软件一个月的费用。就用5天。现在钱也不退一直叫补钱 骗子地址:TDKFF9Ngbqb3d8pFQMc9BSw4iT761T6eVz 👤 8576371377 👦🏻 棋牌辅助透视 🌐 @pojiepojie1 🇨🇳 Chinese 🕑 已更新 02/08/2026 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

4 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC271 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

拉假群 骗我2010 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

2 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC357 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

这个死骗子说做完50单结算,等做完单后发给他第二天回复说11-12点结算,后面发信息给他就失联了, 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

2 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC290 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

做了波币实名不结账给我给我跑了11个人头 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

1 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC338 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

冒充欧易公群,骗子是卖电子烟的然后我去找他交易后面又让我找另外一个人然后另外一个人说给我送然后那个人说又给我删了后面我去找仲裁找公群里面的人公群里面的人都不管 💎担保选欧易 交易有底气:@oooa @ooob @oooc @ooox @ooos @ooow @oooy @ooog @oook @oygq @oygx @oydb @xinqun💎

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @jubao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 435,019 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全网骗子曝光📷套路骗局揭秘❗️” (@jubao), 4,981 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jubao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.