Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خربـشات

Channel

خربـشات

@ju7or249

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,181subscribers

-105 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001986529177
TypeChannel
Username@ju7or249
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ju7or249

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1815,2865,233.528 August 2026 — 5,286 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,284 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,267 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,251 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,224 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,202 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,181 subscribers28 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,165–5,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:165,181-21
13 Sept 2026, 13:575,202-22
9 Sept 2026, 10:015,224-27
4 Sept 2026, 09:205,251-16
1 Sept 2026, 04:455,267-17
28 Aug 2026, 18:145,284-2
28 Aug 2026, 02:465,286first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.57%
avg views ÷ 5,181 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 August 202626 August 2026)
Views total2,261
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2583.3%
🍓516.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC75 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @htzzzznjhgyteoe

أنا الشخص اللي بيعرف يواسي الناس كلها،ويجي عند نفسه ويقف عاجز مش عارف يطبطب على كلمة واحدة.»!

Signed ŇỖŇỖЎÃŤЎ🖤🪽

25 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC125 viewsread 28 August 2026

- مساء الخير جرام الدهب بقى ب900 ألف، تاني إلا تبقى خاتم في أصبعها

Signed ʙʀɪɴᴊᴇ برنجي. 4ᴋ

24 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC158 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_of_hearts77Photo

حقيبةٌ تحمل أملًا.. وقلبٌ يحمل حُلمًا.. ودعمٌ يجعل الحلم حقيقة صدقتكِ اليوم سببًا في أن يبدأ يتيمٌ عامه الدراسي بفرحٍ وكرامة فالحقيبة ليست مجرد أقلامٍ ودفاتر بل خطوةٌ نحو مستقبلٍ أجمل نحو طبيبٍ ومهندسٍ ومعلّمٍ يصنع أثرًا في مجتمعه بإذن الله كون السبب.. 💐 ساهم في الحقيبةٍ مدرسيةٍ واجعل بداية عامه الدراسي بدايةَ أملٍ جديد وصنع فرحة يتيم صدقتكِ اليوم.. حقيبته غدًا.. ومستقبله بإذن الله. 🌷 🟣 أرقام التبرعات: ▪️ "بنك

Signed Heba Dasho

24 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC120 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_of_hearts77Photo

مـشـروع ارتـواء ارتواء أثرٌ يبقى وحياةٌ تزهر🌧️ قال رسول الله ﷺ:«أفضل الصدقة سقي الماء» يطلق المكتب المالي بمبادرة غيث القلوب مشروع ارتواء ليكون غيثًا يروي الظمأ، وصدقةً جاريةً تسقي القلوب قبل الأبدان. 🔹يهدف المشروع إلى: توفير المياه للمناطق الأشد حاجة حيث يكون الماء سببًا في الحياة وعطاؤك قد يكون طوق نجاةٍ لأرواح أنهكها العطش 📌ساهم معنا واجعل لك أثرًا لا ينقطع ▪️بنكك: 4372170 ▪️فوري: 51679604 ▪️أوكاش: 1202198 ▪️م

Signed Heba Dasho

23 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

- اقطع العلاقات برشلونة رجع ❤️💙

2

Signed ʙʀɪɴᴊᴇ برنجي. 4ᴋ

23 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC137 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_of_hearts77Photo

🎒 حملة حقيبةٌ تحمل حلمًا. مع بداية العام الدراسي يعود الأطفال إلى مقاعد الدراسة بأحلامٍ كبيرة لكن هناك أيتامًا ينتظرون من يعينهم على هذه البداية. لذلك تطلق شِلَل المكتب المالي حملة الحقيبة المدرسية للأيتام لتوفير: 🎒 حقيبة مدرسية 📚 دفاتر ✏️ أقلام ساهم اليوم وامنح طفلًا بدايةً تليق بحلمه. لك أجر ولهم بداية🌷 🔻 أرقام التبرعات: ▪️ بنكك: 4372170 ▪️ ماي كاشي: 400104257 ▪️ فوري: 51679604 ▪️ أوكاش: 1202198 جميع الأرقا

Signed Heba Dasho

23 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC107 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_of_hearts77Photo

حملة بناء الأثر💐 ساهم في شراء المصاحف والكتب الشرعية، وصيانة المراكز والمستلزمات ، واجعل لك نصيبًا من كل آيةٍ تُتلى، وكل علمٍ يُنتفع به ازرعْ خيرًا... يَبقَ ذِكرًا وابذلْ لله... يَعظُم أجرًا 🟣 أرقام التبرعات: ▪️ بنكك: 4372170 ▪️ ماي كاشي: 400104257 ▪️ فوري: 51679604 ▪️ اوكاش: 1202198 كُــل الـارقــام بـإســـم: دلال عفيف الدين احمد البشير 🔻 أرقام الرصيد: ▪️ سوداني: 0115352042 ▪️ زين: 0905097601 ▪️ أريبا: 0923

Signed Heba Dasho

23 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC112 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_of_hearts77Photo

هل احتفل النبي ﷺ بمولده؟ لم يثبت عنه ﷺ أنه احتفل بمولده ولا أنه أمر أصحابه بذلك كما لم يُعرف عن أصحابه رضي الله عنهم أنهم فعلوا ذلك وقد ذكر الشيخ ابن باز رحمه الله أن الاحتفال بالمولد لم يثبت عن النبي ﷺ ولا عن أصحابه، وأنه من الأمور المحدثة في الدين لو كان الاحتفال بالمولد عبادةً مشروعة يتقرب بها المسلم إلى الله لكان النبي ﷺ أول من يبينها لأمته ولكان أصحابه رضي الله عنهم أسبق الناس إليها لأنهم كانوا أشد الناس حبًا

Signed Heba Dasho

23 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC120 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_of_hearts77

> هل الاحتفال بالمولد من تعظيم شعائر الله؟ من العبارات الخطأ التي نسمعها: «نحن نحتفل بالمولد لأنه من تعظيم شعائر الله وتعظيم النبي ﷺ» تعظيم شعائر الله أمر عظيم ومشروع لكن السؤال هل جعل الاحتفال بالمولد من شعائر الله ثبت بدليل؟ قال الله تعالى: ﴿ذَٰلِكَ وَمَن يُعَظِّمْ شَعَائِرَ اللَّهِ فَإِنَّهَا مِن تَقْوَى الْقُلُوبِ﴾ [الحج: 32] فالآية تحثنا على تعظيم شعائر الله لكن تحديد ما هو من شعائر الله في العبادات لا

Signed Heba Dasho

23 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC113 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_of_hearts77Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Heba Dasho

22 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC159 viewsread 28 August 2026

الخير ولا الطيب هههههههههه اسفة

Signed Mno🫐

22 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTC155 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @htzzzznjhgyteoe

صباح بس صباح لان الخير لسا نايم»! 🌚

3

Signed ŇỖŇỖЎÃŤЎ🖤🪽

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ju7or249. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mood :)
@Yakoziyat · 40,697
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
رِوايات سُودانية🪐🤎!)"
@RwayatSudan · 37,112
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
خواطر شاب
@Waeloo2 · 24,902
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
إمتحانات وأوراق عمل - طلاب الشهادة السودانية
@sudaneseexams2023 · 44,642
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خربـشات” (@ju7or249), 5,181 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ju7or249.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.