Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from JF Factory where made. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Regards, Jtime

Channel
JTime Official News Broadcast
@jtimewatches
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
11,101subscribers
+113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001784788055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jtimewatches |
| Description | News from JTime Watch _____________________________ Contact Details: Website: www.jtime.io WhatsApp: +852 5792 6970 E-mail: [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jtimewatches |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:29 | 11,101 | +15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 11,086 | +31 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 11,055 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 11,048 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 11,044 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 11,037 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 11,033 | +9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 11,024 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 11,020 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 11,021 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 11,010 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 11,003 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 10,993 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 10,988 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 10,988 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 33.6%
- avg views ÷ 11,101 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,730
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.385%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (23 June 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,930 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 357
- Links
- 121
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
233 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 137 | 58.8% | |
| 👍 | 71 | 30.5% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 8.15% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.858% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.429% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.429% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.429% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.429% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 233reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from VSF and DDF Factory where made. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Regards, Jtime
❤11🔥3
Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from RICH, ZF, DDF and MILLE Studio Factory where made. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Regards, Jtime
❤12🔥3
Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from ERF, ZF, QF, ANTF and MILLE Studio Factory where made. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Regards, Jtime
❤17👍6
Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from ERF, ZF, QF and VSF where made. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Regards, Jtime
❤19👍6👏2😭1
JTime Official News Broadcast pinned a photo
Important Notice Our WhatsApp account has recently been repeatedly restricted, and the same issue also occurred with our previous WhatsApp account. As a result, we have been unable to respond to WhatsApp messages promptly. You can contact via Email & Telegram E-mail: [email protected] Telegram: +85257926970 (or username @JTimeLi) Email & Telegram are more reliably for communication. Thank you for your kind un…
👍34❤8
Dear customers The RWI Review team has made a nice review of a IWC watch that was purchased from us - check it out here: https://forum.replica-watch.info/threads/review-m-iwc-pilots-watch-41-ceramic-george-russell-m9015-vs-a2892-head-to-head.11046963/ If you are interested in this model or another IWC just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Whatsapp: +85257926970 (New numb…
❤18👍15🔥7
Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from QF where made. Also there is new stock from VSF. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Whatsapp: +85257926970 (New number, permanently) Regards, Jtime
❤10🔥2👍1🥰1
Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from ZF where made. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Whatsapp: +85257926970 (New number, permanently) Regards, Jtime
❤23👍1
Dear customers Some updates on our homepage of watches from various factories where made. Check it out! Have a look and as always, for inquiries just hit us up! Email: [email protected] Website: jtime.io WeChat: jtimewatch Whatsapp: +85257926970 (New number, permanently) Regards, Jtime
❤19👍8🔥4💩1😢1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @jtimewatches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JTime Official News Broadcast” (@jtimewatches), 11,101 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jtimewatches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.