下午好
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮

Channel
@jsdhdj8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,356subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002305260463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jsdhdj8 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jsdhdj8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 3,356 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 3,355 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:49 | 3,357 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 3,361 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 3,370 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 3,367 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 3,368 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 3,364 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (22 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 221 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
31 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 41.9% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 38.7% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
下午好
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
若隱若現的粉色鮑魚~
❤7
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
🤩🤩謝謝哥哥送來的客評 ♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️ 可否LG:可以 妹妹是否主動:主動
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
這些話 我猶豫了很久 不知道要如何說出來 也怕你們會覺得我在賣慘 但事實就是 我現在的業績真的差很多 如果這兩天有願意幫我的帥哥 我一定會給你們最優的小姐 最大的優惠 認識我久的哥哥都知道 我從來沒有在頻道說過這些話 所以我真心覺得愧疚 你們平時也很辛苦 也有自己的事情和壓力 我是真的沒辦法了 所以想拜託這兩天如果有空閒時間又剛好有意向的帥哥 可以幫我一次嗎 僅此一次求助了 我會一輩子都記得你們的好 也願意給你們我最大的誠意
❤1
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
Posted without readable text
❤1
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
@@ 求求你們了 錢不給我約妹 也沒關係 不要拿去喂詐騙啊😭 我心疼你們賺錢那麽辛苦 去年我剛入行的時候 就陸陸續續有很多客人被騙 類似這種約炮免費 入會約炮的 天下沒有免費的午餐 結果就是那個客人前後23天 被騙金額超過210萬了
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
⚠️嚴重聲明⚠️必須看完⚠️ 青青是一個人做的 沒有和任何茶莊、店家合作 更沒有所謂的約會入會 請大家一定不要受騙 上次有發一篇詐騙模擬 你們也要去看完 https://t.me/jsdhdj8/3208 ❌現在騙子的手段只會越來約多 ❌請大家一定記住一點 ❌真正的茶莊 從來不會要求你們 ❌先轉賬、點數卡、入會、押金、保證金、先轉預約費 全部都是詐騙 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ ✅正確流程 開好房間 錢拿在自己手裏 見到女生 和我回報 確定是同一個之後 喜歡給妹妹現金
🫡1
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
我真暈了
😭1
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
過往時光 我細數 我珍重
🥰11
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
Posted without readable text
👏1
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
Posted without readable text
🔥1
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
Posted without readable text
👍1
Signed 沐青の茶+Gleezy:mkove06送好禮
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jsdhdj8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 18,636 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇹🇼沐青首選|台灣本土外送約會” (@jsdhdj8), 3,356 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jsdhdj8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.