今日头条/安危事件/热点新闻推送 pinned a video

Channel
今日头条/安危事件/热点新闻推送
@jrtt1111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,340subscribers
-79 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001090398982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jrtt1111 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jrtt1111 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 20,340 | -37 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 20,377 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 20,387 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 20,399 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 20,411 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 20,419 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 20,419 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 77.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2025 to 27 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🫠😬🤤😬😍😘😎😎😌🥰🤤😬 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴最佳体育信誉盘💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴极致的福利待遇💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴赔付100%透明信誉保障💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴底薪过万,年入百万不是梦💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴备战2026世界杯,欢迎想赚一波的兄弟💕 🛍以下岗位全直招无返佣,不坑不骗不禁足🛍 业绩岗位: ✅招商专员 ✅招商组长 ✅推广专员 ✅推广组长 职能岗位: ✅招聘专员 ✅招聘组长 ✅风控专员 ✅风控主管 ✅后勤专员 ✅部门助理 ✅客服专员 ✅代理维护专员 ✅行政专员 ✅推广维护专员 ——————————————— 🥰【个人简历表】 🌶🥦🍆🥑 👍👍 🫑🌽🥒🥦 🥰福利行业首屈一指 🥰不禁足 🥰可上门参观,可约面谈 🥰完善的培训制度,涨薪制度 🍃寝室:2个人一间 🍃福利:全勤奖500元,年终奖 ,有13-17薪+过年红包,忠诚奖…
今日头条/安危事件/热点新闻推送 pinned a photo
🫠😬🤤😬😍😘😎😎😌🥰🤤😬 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴最佳体育信誉盘💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴极致的福利待遇💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴赔付100%透明信誉保障💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴底薪过万,年入百万不是梦💕 🇮🇷🇯🇵🇭🇰🇯🇴备战2026世界杯,欢迎想赚一波的兄弟💕 业绩岗位: ✅招商专员 ✅招商组长 ✅推广专员 ✅推广组长 职能岗位: ✅招聘专员 ✅招聘组长 ✅风控专员 ✅风控主管 ✅后勤专员 ✅部门助理 ✅客服专员 ✅代理维护专员 ✅行政专员 ——————————————— 🥰【个人简历表】 🌶🥦🍆🥑 👍👍 🫑🌽🥒🥦 🥰福利行业首屈一指 🥰不禁足 🥰可上门参观,可约面谈 🥰完善的培训制度,涨薪制度 🍃寝室:2个人一间 🍃福利:全勤奖500元,年终奖 ,有13-17薪+过年红包,忠诚奖 🍃假期福利:公司每年提供15天带薪年假 每满12个月 可享受15…
❤3
👍👍👍👍👍👍 😵💫😵💫😵💫Telegram 飞机高级会员代充😵💫😵💫😵💫 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 👉👉👉🔘只需要提供用户名就可以🔘👉👉👉👉 💎三个月会员 14 USDT 💎六个月会员 19 USDT 💎十二个月会员 34 USDT 卡密方式: 💎三个月会员 12 USDT 💎六个月会员 17 USDT 💎十二个月会员 30 USDT 👍 👍 👍 👍 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 🆘🆘🆘🆘安全靠谱官方正价开通,保不掉! ⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺ 👍👍👍👍伊人: @Yiren66📌📌 PS:此项目由今日头条担保可放心付款!!!
❤1👍1
司法部正式下令逮捕前总统发言人,和多位 POGO 大佬 5 月 15 日,司法部证实,邦板牙省安赫莱斯市法院下令逮捕前总统发言人哈利 · 罗克与菲华女商人 Cassandra Ong,两人被控“加重人口贩运罪”,并且“不准保释”。此外,法院还向包括 POGO 大佬吴某在内的 47 人发出逮捕令。 司法部副部长尼古拉斯 · 泰证实,逮捕令由安赫莱斯市地方法院签发。法院在命令中指出,有足够理由将所有被告移送审判。 除罗克与 Ong 之外,此案另一核心人物吴某亦被下令逮捕,但自国会听证会开始以来他便下落不明。目前,罗克人在荷兰海牙寻求政治庇护。由于菲律宾与荷兰之间没有引渡条约,其引渡问题尚无定论
❤3
受Telegrame屏蔽影响,好旺担保宣布停止运营 BlockBeats 消息,5 月 15 日,好旺担保(Haowang Guarantee,原汇旺担保,Huione Guarantee)近日在其官网发布公告称,「公司所有的 NFT、频道和群组都被 Telegrame 屏蔽,Haowang Grarantee 将从现在开始停止运营。」 另据 Wired 报道,好旺担保此举是对 Telegram 周一采取行动的回应,Telegram 封禁了数千个账户,这些账户构成了庞大第三方供应商市场的基础设施,其中许多供应商为蓬勃发展的东亚加密货币诈骗行业提供洗钱和其他服务。 此前消息,今年 4 月,联合国报告指出汇旺担保等非法加密货币项目是网络犯罪集团的「有力工具」。
❤1
👍👍👍👍👍👍 😵💫😵💫😵💫Telegram 飞机高级会员代充😵💫😵💫😵💫 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 👉👉👉🔘只需要提供用户名就可以🔘👉👉👉👉 💎三个月会员 14 USDT 💎六个月会员 19 USDT 💎十二个月会员 34 USDT 卡密方式: 💎三个月会员 12 USDT 💎六个月会员 17 USDT 💎十二个月会员 30 USDT 👍 👍 👍 👍 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 🆘🆘🆘🆘安全靠谱官方正价开通,保不掉! ⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺ 👍👍👍👍伊人: @Yiren66📌📌 PS:此项目由今日头条担保可放心付款!!!
👍3❤1
点击我的推荐链接注册欧易,即可获取最高 100 USDT 的奖励! https://okx.com/join/50779034 邀请码:50779034 填写我的邀请码,即可获得20%手续费返佣
菲律宾官方否认打击Pogo“专门针对中国人” 坦承仍有百余非法窝点在运作 针对中国驻菲大使馆日前发布的“菲律宾执法部门频繁盘查、骚扰中国公民与企业”的警示言论,菲律宾总统反有组织犯罪委员会(PAOCC)主任吉尔伯特·克鲁兹(Gilbert Cruz)于4月10日公开回应,否认政府在打击菲律宾离岸博彩运营商(Pogo)的过程中“专门针对中国人”。 克鲁兹表示:“确实大多数被捕的是中国人,但也包括越南、马来西亚、印尼等外籍人士。政府是不是特别针对中国人?我认为不是这样。” 他解释,近期在全国范围展开的大规模执法行动中,确实查获了大量非法Pogo从业者,“但中国人被逮只是恰逢其会”,并非有意针对。他强调,“执法对象是违法行为本身,而不是特定国籍。” 根据政府此前公布的打击目标,马科斯政府于去年已宣布全面取缔非法Pogo,原因涉及其与网络诈骗、人口贩运、洗钱等多项跨国犯罪的关联。执法单位近期陆续拘捕了多名非法Pogo从业者,其中…
❤2
奎松省42名中国人被捕 后续 已进入遣返程序 奎松省42名中国人被捕!全无证件、非法打工,移民局启动遣返程序! 2025年4月9日清晨5:44,菲律宾移民局(BI)在总统反有组织犯罪委员会(PAOCC)与国家警察(PNP)协助下,突袭奎松省偏远地区Alabat湾Villa Norte村一处可疑设施,当场拘捕42名中国籍人士。 🔍 突袭由情资推动,目标为“办公+住宿”混合场所 据移民局透露,此次突袭由局长Joel Anthony Viado亲签特别任务令发起。目标地点是一座隐蔽的多功能设施——不仅可办公,亦提供集中住宿,明显具备隐藏外籍非法劳工活动的结构特征。 自称参与建设工程,但无一人能出示合法证件 执法人员表示,这些中国人中无人能出示有效护照或签证文件,尽管部分人声称自己从事风力发电等建筑项目,但调查显示,他们均无合法工作许可,且多数属逾期滞留。 移民局强硬表态:“非法滞留,零容忍!” 局长Viado斩钉截铁地…
Telegram惊现公开群组聊天索引机器人 抓取8.6亿名用户的560亿条发言记录 Telegram 惊现公开群组聊天索引机器人,该机器人抓取高达 560 亿条用户发言数据,涉及 8.6 亿用户和 3600 万个订阅频道或群组。目前机器人不提供特定用户的具体发言记录,但任意用户都可以查询他人的历史发言数据、加入/退出的群组、经常群里对话的好友等等。 大多数开放群组都是可以公开加入的,或许这也是开发者可以构建爬虫疯狂抓取这些聊天记录的原因,只是对用户来说这种发言被抓取的行为多少有些恶心人。 目前还不清楚 Telegram 是否也会采取技术手段防御这类抓爬行为,如前文所说,对用户来说这不算是安全漏洞,不过对 Telegram 来说这可能属于安全缺陷了,毕竟竟然有爬虫抓取如此海量的数据竟然没被拦截。
❤2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jrtt1111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 192,540 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@jrtt1111 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 8 posts, 10 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 10 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 10 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@QWHRBGB · 294,140
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“今日头条/安危事件/热点新闻推送” (@jrtt1111), 20,340 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jrtt1111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.