Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 精品用户名出售

Channel

精品用户名出售

@jptgm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002066023307
TypeChannel
Username@jptgm
Created18 May 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jptgm

Growth

47 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:314no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:514first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 18 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

30 May 2024, 02:00 UTC150 viewsread 13 August 2026

@CNoldfox 中国老狐狸 10T 👉fragment.com/username/cnoldfox

30 May 2024, 01:47 UTC145 viewsread 13 August 2026

@TaoTronics 2008年创立的电子品牌,8.9万脸书粉丝 500T 👉 fragment.com/username/taotronics

30 May 2024, 01:33 UTC156 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tgvip001 电报vip001 10T 👉 fragment.com/username/tgvip001

30 May 2024, 01:29 UTC153 viewsread 13 August 2026

@i01314 爱你一生一世 10T 👉 fragment.com/username/i01314

30 May 2024, 01:22 UTC173 viewsread 13 August 2026

@daima9527 代码9527(熟悉周星驰电影的都懂)10T 👉 fragment.com/username/daima9527

29 May 2024, 05:28 UTC160 viewsread 13 August 2026

@i9420 (我就是爱你)五位用户名,好记又有爱,20T 👉https://fragment.com/username/i9420

29 May 2024, 05:02 UTC159 viewsread 13 August 2026

@diaandco With the same user name on Facebook, it has more than 800000 fans on Facebook, which has a lot of room to rise, and now the starting price is 1000 T.(脸书同名用户名,脸书粉丝超过80万,有很大上涨空间,现在起拍价1000T) 👉 fragment.com/username/diaandco

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @jptgm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,051,584 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“精品用户名出售” (@jptgm), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jptgm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.