one more reset incoming

Channel
JPawchannel 🚀
@jpawchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001790855385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jpawchannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jpawchannel |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 47 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 46 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 47 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
sodl one week earlier :D
true :D
nice cost efficiency chart btw luna max is v cheap. am basically now orchestrating with opus 5 max or got 5.6 sol max. hard tasks going to sol xhigh or opus xhigh but medium and easy tasks are handled by luna max or xhigh. this combo covers almost any goal
imho the reason why crypto usually bottoms before legacy is in sensitivity, smaller mcap and higher efficiency cuz crypto never sleeps the asset is smol, never sleeps and easy to move means that it reacts faster to market conditions
us30y 30 years treasury yields breaking out of 5% resistance
my view is similar to this chart timing wise, meaning i think we'll bottom around october, but before that think we can push to 71-73 in august all other onchain data also shows that bottom is not reached yet. now with legacy getting rekt (and maybe entering bear market) i guess this could push crypto lower btw crypto usually bottoms before legacy by few days onchain ta
great read from fidenza macro tldr legacy entering a bear market https://www.fidenzamacro.com/p/july-2026-a-turning-point-in-the
daily chart of samsung memory rekt. situational awareness given as sacrifice to mark a local bottom hopefully ram and vram will also dump
luna is way cheaper now luna max fully replaces terra xhigh and 5.5 medium sol on medium slightly smarter but the cost difference is too big to use sol on medium
closed gold. was expecting a bit quicker bounce, now a bit less sure abt timing overall still think it can bounce to 4380-4500, then drop to 3500 ta trd
fomc same rates (3.5-3.75)
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jpawchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JPawchannel 🚀” (@jpawchannel), 47 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpawchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.