Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Jouwatch

@jouwatch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

9,301subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001287658470
TypeChannel
Username@jouwatch
Descriptionjournalistenwatch.com
Created16 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jouwatch

Growth

9,2999,3079,3036 August 2026 — 9,307 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,307 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,306 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,299 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,301 subscribers9,3016 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,298–9,308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:339,301+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:539,299-7
6 Aug 2026, 13:079,306-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:179,307no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:489,307first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.19%
avg views ÷ 9,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
855
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held100 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total85,454
Reactions total2,531
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,350
Videos
8
Links
37,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,531 reactions across 100 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1,09543.3%
👍70227.7%
🔥45718.1%
👏2188.61%
🤔552.17%
👎40.158%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,531reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC82 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

München–Hamburg: 22.000 Euro im Todesfall Seit 2018 wurden in deutschen Zügen mehr als 700 Messerangriffe auf Fahrgäste registriert. Allein 2025 waren es 146. Im selben Jahr zählte die Bundespolizei weitere 451 Messerangriffe an Bahnhöfen sowie… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/muenchen-hamburg-22-000-euro-im-todesfall/

👏1🤬1

12 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC198 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Letztes Aufgebot: Absurd hohes Wahlkampf-Budget soll die Grünen in Sachsen-Anhalt und Meck-Pomm retten Laut einer aktuellen INSA-Umfrage liegt die AfD in Sachsen-Anhalt weniger als einen Monat vor der Landtagswahl bei 42 Prozent, zwanzig Punkte vor der regierenden CDU. Die Linke kommt auf 13 Prozent,… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/letztes-aufgebot-absurd-hohes-wahlkampf-budget-soll-die-gruenen-in-sachs

🔥4🤔1🤬1

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC287 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Schlagzeilen, die man Merz links und rechts um die Ohren hauen müsste 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/schlagzeilen-die-man-merz-links-und-rechts-um-die-ohren-hauen-muesste-72/

👍2👏2

12 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC352 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Grüner grölte “Ausländer raus!“: Wo bleibt das Verfassungsschutzgutachten? Nun haben selbst die Grünen ihren Nazi-Skandal in den eigenen Reihen. Kürzlich wurde ein drei Jahre altes Video bekannt, das ihr 23-jähriges Mitglied David Possenriede dabei zeigt, wie es zur Musik… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/gruener-groelte-auslaender-raus-wo-bleibt-das-verfassungsschutzgutachten/

👍2🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC398 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Abtreibung bis zur Geburt: Linke feiern Legalisierung des Kindesmords in Massachussetts als “wegweisend“ In den von den linken Demokraten regierten US-Bundesstaaten nimmt der Todesmut und die Banalisierung der Vernichtung ungeborenen Lebens immer monströsere und amoralischere Ausmaße an. Nicht allein, wer Abtreibungen generell ablehnt,… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/abtreibung-bis-zur-geburt-linke-feie

🔥7🤬3

12 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC449 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Plansch-Rassisten am Werk? Das Entsetzen war groß, als die "Welt" folgendes verkündete: "Seit dem 7. August steht vor der Volksbühne am Rosa-Luxemburg-Platz in Berlin ein temporäres Schwimmbad. Dieses „Volksbad“ wurde als „offen für… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/plansch-rassisten-am-werk/

🔥7🤔1🤬1

12 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC483 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Läuft das BSW in die „Höcke-Falle“? Ein Mann mit Anstand und Ehre wäre schon längst zurückgetreten. Mario Voigt tut das nicht, obwohl er jetzt noch einmal eine Vollklatsche vor Gericht wegen der Plagiats-Affäre einstecken müsste. Er… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/laeuft-das-bsw-in-die-hoecke-falle/

👍21👏2

12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC508 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Buntes Düren: Multikulturelle Massenschlägerei mit Hämmern, Äxten und Stichwaffen Die Massenschlägerei in Düren vom Sonntagabend zeigt einmal mehr, welch eine unfassbare Barbarei in diesem Land mit der Massenmigration eingezogen ist. Mehr als 20 Menschen beharkten sich auf offener Straße… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/buntes-dueren-multikulturelle-massenschlaegerei-mit-haemmern-aexten-und-stichwaffen/

🔥8👍2🤬2

12 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC531 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Alarmierende Machtausweitung der Geheimdienste: Dobrindts Dammbruch Innenminister Alexander Dobrindt treibt die Machterweiterung des Verfassungsschutzes und des Bundesnachrichtendienstes entschlossen voran. „Die hybride Bedrohungslage, die Versuche der Destabilisierung durch Sabotage, Spionage, Cyberangriffe und verdeckte Aktionen fremder Mächte bekommen… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/alarmierende-mach

🔥12🤬1

12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC565 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Der MDR, Uli Siegmund und die Mär vom früher viel unsicheren Deutschland Siegmund im MDR-Interview: Wie vor jedem öffentlich-rechtlichen “Dialog“ mit einem der wortmächtigsten, überzeugendsten und populärsten Zugpferde der Schwefelpartei wurde auch Moderatorin Susanne Reichenbach, der die undankbare (möglicherweise aber auch von… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/12/der-mdr-uli-siegmund-und-die-maer-vom-frueh

👍11🤬3

11 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC787 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Berlin: Schwimmbad-Verbot für Weiße Der Kreis schließt sich: 1935 traten die Nürnberger Gesetze in Kraft, die Nazis verfügten damals neben massenhaften weiteren Diskriminierungen auch Zutrittsverbote à la “Kein Eintritt für Nichtarier“. Neun Jahrzehnte später… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/11/berlin-schwimmbad-verbot-fuer-weisse/

🤬34🔥5

11 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC749 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Migranten, wertvoller als Gold Italien und Dänemark rechnen mit Europas Migrationspolitik ab Martin Schulz, der fast schon vergessene ehemalige Präsident des EU-Parlaments und “uneinholbarer” SPD-Kanzlerkandidat von 2017, wurde durch einen historischen Satz bekannt, was… 🔗 https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/08/11/migranten-wertvoller-als-gold/

🤬26🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @jouwatch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 185,736 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q48756561 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelJournalistenwatch
Descriptionright-wing blog
Official sitehttp://www.journalistenwatch.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jouwatch” (@jouwatch), 9,301 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jouwatch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.