Posted without readable text
🔥5🗿2custom 54743491363398269551

Channel
@journey_liceum
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,455subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002729691305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @journey_liceum |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/journey_liceum |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 1,455 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 1,462 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 1,466 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 1,469 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 1,480 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 1,482 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 1,486 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 1,485 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 1,487 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 1,492 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 1,494 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 1,500 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 1,503 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
72 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 40.3% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 23.6% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5472005694808947953 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5474349136339826955 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5472045942947477145 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| custom 5472350739596605336 | 1 | 1.39% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🔥5🗿2custom 54743491363398269551
Вещи в философии и философия в вещах «Назад к вещам!» — сказал Эдмунд Гуссерль в начале XX века всей образованной европейской публике. И мы наконец-то услышали! В прошлых карточках мы уже показали, что и в каких ситуациях нужно сказать, чтобы все поняли, что философии находится в числе ваших интересов. Но не всегда дело доходит до разговоров, а донести, что вы глубоко вовлечены в философию хочется — и для этих слу…
🔥6❤2👍2
Posted without readable text
❤11👍2🔥1
Когда я у мамы философ Мы много пишем о том, что философию нужно изучать не просто для того, чтобы осмыслять реальность более качественно и повышать уровень саморефлексии (не говоря о развитии мировоззрения) – но и для практического применения. Сегодня в карточках мы собрали ситуации, где ваше знание философии сможет качественно изменить уровень дискуссии (и, конечно, покажет, что вы очень классный_ая)
😁7❤4custom 54720056948089479532
Posted without readable text
💯3🔥2🗿1custom 54720459429474771451custom 54723507395966053361
Как выбираются книги Совсем недавно мы анонсировали совместный розыгрыш Центра Вознесенского и Journey Лицея в поддержку выставки «Крич. Всёчество и разборчивость». А теперь пришло время забирать подарки! Наш подарок – «Кибернетика и происхождение информации» Раймона Рюйера. Но почему именно она? Выбор книги в подарок – ответственная вещь. Чтобы выбрать книгу в подарок, вам нужно хорошо понимать: а) чем интересуе…
❤5
Плохо – это плохо, а хорошо – это норма. Обычно вопрос о репутации встает в негативном ключе: что у человека есть какие-то темные пятна, которые стоит учитывать при выстраивании отношений с ним. И это нужно проговаривать и обозначать, ведь не хочется получить “кота в мешке” А вот о хорошей репутации как-то отдельно говорить не принято, ведь когда все нормально – оно и так нормально. Зачем лишний раз проговаривать? …
❤7👍3🔥3custom 54743491363398269551
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @journey_liceum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рабочая Философия” (@journey_liceum), 1,455 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/journey_liceum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.