Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Josh del Sol channel

@joshdelsol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,831subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001338013431
TypeChannel
Username@joshdelsol
Created16 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/joshdelsol

Growth

3,8313,8393,8356 August 2026 — 3,839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,839 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,833 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,831 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,830–3,840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:243,831-2
10 Aug 2026, 02:023,833-6
6 Aug 2026, 10:483,839no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:483,839first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.20%
avg views ÷ 3,831 subscribers
Avg views / post
314
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (18 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,829
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36m 37s
Average length
3m 40s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7139.4%
🔥4223.3%
❤‍🔥3720.6%
👍168.89%
84.44%
🙏63.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC91 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

New Instagram post — https://www.instagram.com/p/DbwXPH7klXI/ Join tomorrow’s free stream (10am PT / 1pm ET) — https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/Ba2ay_ujRqeoF7waOjfzbA

🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC191 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥43👍1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC217 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This Saturday 8/8, you are invited to a very special livestream with leading scholar and author Neil Douglas-Klotz – joined by spiritual guide Lorie Ladd and myself: "Experiencing The Aramaic Jesus." Many are getting the call to go deeper in faith at this time. But is mainstream religion what we're being called into? And how do the teachings of Yeshua come alive, shift and deepen when seen in the lens of his origina

2👍1

2 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC390 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Choosing the discomfort, so it doesn’t have to choose you. IG: ivan_yaroslavtsev_strong

🔥9

2 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC279 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfeVideo

The last word on the Covid Scamdemic. (3 min) Join: @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

❤‍🔥13🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 02:06 UTC384 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The first 2 minutes and 35 seconds from Glen Hansard’s Oscar-winning film, “Once”. Glen died early yesterday in a motorcycle accident. His timeless message lives on: Say what’s in your heart, fully live while you’re here in this gift of life. Watch “Once” tonight. Have tissues nearby. My daughter and I watched it today (my 2nd viewing). Riveting and heartwarming film. RIP Glen Hansard 1970-2026 https://youtube.c

❤‍🔥81🙏1

23 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC486 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @awakenedspeciesVideo

Max Spiers: To Control The World You Need To Take Out The Alpha Males “If you want to completely take over a planet the first thing that you have to do is take out the Alpha males” The emasculation and feminization of the alpha male are one of the government's main targets to gain full control of the population, they used an evil harsher tactic in slavery called “Buck Breaking". They are trying to Completely Destr

🔥7👍31❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC538 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @foodforestabundanceVideo

Can you imagine how beautiful and abundant this community can be… and with the full support of the mayor and the City Council. Let’s do this everywhere.

6

3 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC827 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Super intriguing. I’ve researched aspects of this over the years, though this is quite the distillation + update. And it lines up with what is written in a number of the ancient books in the Nag Hammadi library — censored by the Roman Empire which burned the Library of Alexandria. At least, it’s food for thought!

👍7🔥3

2 Jul 2026, 21:14 UTC702 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

True faith in action. The naphsha’s surrender to abwoon and the malkuta (Aramaic lens).

2❤‍🔥1🙏1

2 Jul 2026, 04:07 UTC569 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ever been shamed for being "too much" or "too sensitive"?? Watch this.

83

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @joshdelsol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 253,012 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Josh del Sol channel” (@joshdelsol), 3,831 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/joshdelsol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.