Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 39 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,028–1,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 16:17
1,032
-2
12 Sept 2026, 00:58
1,034
-1
2 Sept 2026, 17:17
1,035
-7
27 Aug 2026, 09:33
1,042
+8
24 Aug 2026, 16:04
1,034
+3
21 Aug 2026, 05:03
1,031
-3
17 Aug 2026, 18:14
1,034
+4
14 Aug 2026, 22:46
1,030
-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:21
1,032
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:52
1,032
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
300 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5348024669171628690
109
36.3%
🔥
85
28.3%
🥰
55
18.3%
👍
32
10.7%
👏
19
6.33%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧙♂ Грамматика, которая работает
Часто ли к вам приходят ученики, которые теоретически знают правила, отлично выполняют упражнения на controlled practice, но при этом не умеют говорить?
Если вы преподаете уже какое то количество времени, то наверняка часто сталкиваетесь с таким явлением. Школьные учебники, да и программа, в целом, очень часто мало ориентированы на вывод грамматических конструкций в речь
Этот вопро…
🌴🍋 At the Beach - Summer Picture
Мой когда-то самый любимый жанр, с которого начался мой блог в ВК. Захотелось сделать такие летние картинки, пока как раз продолжается сезон😊🍒
❤️ если было полезно и берете в копилочку
🥰 если делитесь с коллегами
🔥 и то, и другое
💙 Мой VK
🤩 Таких охватов у меня не было ни в одной соцсети..
Тредс вчера выкатил возможность поделиться своими охватами, поэтому делюсь 😊
Если честно, то я не очень слежу за этой метрикой, знаю, что она у меня держится на приличном уровне, потому что для того, чтобы быть популярным в этой сети, нужно соблюдать 2 правила:
💌 писать регулярно
🌟 писать интересно
Я стараюсь соблюдать эти правила. Ну и, что там скрывать, писать…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
☕️ Worksheet, набравший рекордное количество сохранений в Pinterest
Я думаю, вы знаете, что сейчас в учительских кругах очень активно обсуждается тема материалов, созданных с помощью ИИ. Кто-то их критикует и принципиально не использует на уроках, кто-то наоборот. Я считаю, что ИИ на самом деле - очень классный инструмент, если его правильно использовать 😊
Этот рабочий лист был создан комбинированным методом - с по…
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
У моих коллег Марины и Тони в их уютном сообществе Campus есть замечательная традиция - рубрика Не нам судить, но мы обсудим, где обсуждаются всякие насущные учительские темы🤗
Вот я тоже подумала, почему бы нам здесь тоже не организовать небольшой интерактив - обмен мнениями, тем более что у меня на днях как раз появилась для него интересная тема
🎀 Допустимо ли совмещать несколько подходов к обучению? Или преподав…
У меня продолжается отпуск🐚 Он проходит в режиме staycations, но, тем не менее, я стараюсь отдохнуть по максимуму - больше гуляю, занимаюсь собой и стараюсь дать себе возможность просто выдохнуть немного💙
Вчера я гуляла в парке, где увидела такие красивые гортензии😍 (кстати, что это гортензии - я поняла не сразу, т. к. никогда таких не видела, видела до этого только с круглыми бутонами) Но вчера мне подсказали, что…
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Наш любимый Warm Up
Off Campus Version 🤎
♥️ если было полезно и забираете в копилочку
🔥 если делитесь с коллегами
🥰 и то, и другое
#ReadytoUse_jollyteach
И отдельный вопрос для тех, кто ведёт свои блоги - отдыхаете от блога в отпуске или продолжаете вести?
Отдыхаю50%
Веду25%
Хочу отдохнуть, но все равно веду - заберите у меня ноутбук/компьютер😁30%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @jollyteacher_esl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
И отдельный вопрос для тех, кто ведёт свои блоги - отдыхаете от блога в отпуске или продолжаете вести?
Отдыхаю50%
Веду25%
Хочу отдохнуть, но все равно веду - заберите у меня ноутбук/компьютер😁30%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Английский. Весело, оживлённо :)| Jolly Teacher” (@jollyteacher_esl), 1,032 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jollyteacher_esl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
