3 measurements spanning 11 days, net +315. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 354–789 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:37
719
-20
10 Sept 2026, 04:21
739
+335
7 Sept 2026, 19:23
404
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
103.0%
avg views ÷ 719 subscribers
Avg views / post
741
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held
20 (30 July 2026 – 7 September 2026)
Views total
1,481
Reactions total
47
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 19:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 2 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30
63.8%
👎
12
25.5%
🌚
2
4.26%
🫡
2
4.26%
💩
1
2.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
CODE 👉 YPQTBHG3JW2MYAIOAJADUL6ZNE
— Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim.
☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days
☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover)
🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global
📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp
📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram
🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads on Telegram—they're not official
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
CODE 👉 L6NKOP2MQ2VAQRE5J75TF4XEC4
— Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim.
☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days
☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover)
📱 Stay subscribed to this channel!
More BIG BONUS CODES and exclusive rewards will be dropped later today. Don't miss the next one!
🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global
📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp
📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram
🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads o…
SEC Proposes "Regulation Crypto Assets"
The US SEC has introduced a tailored framework specifically for crypto asset capital formation. The proposal introduces safe harbor provisions for decentralized networks and exempts certain token offerings up to $5M from full registration.
Takeaway: A shift from enforcement-only actions toward structured, predictable compliance rules.
Discussion: Will clearer guidelines acceler…
1. Macro & Bitcoin (Interest Rate Policy)
📌 Macro Alert: Rate Cuts & Bitcoin’s Next Move
Global markets are closely watching central bank interest rate decisions. Lower interest rates typically mean increased market liquidity—and historically, that’s when Bitcoin moves.
• Market Sentiment: Cautiously optimistic • Key Focus: Will BTC hold its key support zones?
AI agents and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure) are rapidly changing how we view blockchain utility. Which AI x Crypto project are you holding for the long run? 🤖🌐
BTC Range Bound! 📈📉
Bitcoin is chilling around $63K-$64K right now. Calm before the storm or time to stack quietly?
Drop a 🚀 if you're buying, or 🛡 if you're waiting!
Memecoin Hype vs. Long-Term Utility: Where Do You Stand? 🐕🌀
Memecoins bring massive volume and excitement to retail trading, but fundamental utility projects build the infrastructure for the future. Finding a balance is key to portfolio health.
👇 What percentage of your portfolio is allocated to high-risk Memecoins?
💎 The Institutional ETH Shift
Corporate treasuries and institutional desks are steadily expanding their on-chain Ethereum exposure. Driven by Layer-2 scaling efficiency and steady staking yield narratives, smart money is treating ETH as productive capital rather than a passive asset.
Keep a close eye on L2 gas consumption and Total Value Locked (TVL) metrics this week.
Layer 2 ecosystems continue to scale rapidly, making micro-transactions and everyday crypto use smoother than ever. Gas fees shouldn't hold your trades back anymore! Call to Action: Which L2 network is your daily go-to? Vote below! 🔥
💬 TOKEN RADAR COMMUNITY
Let’s talk crypto.
What are you currently researching?
🪙 Tokens
🎁 Airdrops
🌐 New ecosystems
📈 Market trends
Drop your watchlist below 👇
📊 CRYPTO MARKET CHECK
The market never stays still.
Which narrative do you think will lead next?
🤖 AI Crypto
🌐 DePIN
🎮 GameFi
💎 DeFi
🔗 Layer 2
Vote below 👇
Let’s track the next big trend together.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @join_tokenradar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Token Radar” (@join_tokenradar), 719 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/join_tokenradar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.