Channel
@johannasvis_live
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,861subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002145539749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @johannasvis_live |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/johannasvis_live |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 7,861 | +24 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 7,837 | -98 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 7,935 | +45 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 7,890 | +60 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 7,830 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 7,848 | -28 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 7,876 | -30 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 7,906 | -48 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 7,954 | +152 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 7,802 | -39 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 7,841 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 7,831 | -67 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 7,898 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 7,903 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (1 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,764 |
| Reactions total | 268 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,221 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5330550839540991113 | 1,474 | 66.4% | |
| 🕊 | 747 | 33.6% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✴︎⋆🤍˙☆ ко мне позавчера прилетела мама, не виделись год Стёпка встретил крайне настороженно, лаял, как сирена, пришлось подключать вкусняшки из маминых рук, и так еле-еле, но боясь, стал расслабляться (он у нас уличный и только Богу известно, что он пережил за 3 года на улице, всего боится). потом мы объелись сушками 🍣🍣 彡 разными сладостями, посплетничали и ушли пересобирать чемоданы в поездку
🕊46custom 533055083954099111337
у меня есть какая-то нишевая черта характера или я не знаю чего… но я никогда не рассказываю о своих планах, событиях, пока они не свершатся или хотя бы им не будет сильное подкрепление. в плане, не рассказываю вообще никому, вот ни единому человеку. друзья и близкие обижаются, а я ничего не могу с собой сделать. что с этим делать – не знаю, и надо ли? у кого есть еще такой нюанс? ☆🤩
custom 5330550839540991113116🕊41
вот-вот начнется учебный год последние летние деньки – это не повод для паники, а идеальное время для плавного старта ★ советую, друзья, начинать подготовку к экзаменам уже сейчас, поэтому подпишитесь на преподавателей Умскул, они подготовят вас к огэ/егэ без лишнего стресса ↓ ☆ 11 класс: русский язык, математика, математика (база), обществознание, история, литература, английский, химия, биология, физика, информати…
custom 533055083954099111316🕊12
˚₊‧ 𐙚☆‧₊˚ «не существует чисто зеленого цвета глаз, возможно, смесь с синим, серым или почти карие..» – однажды услышала я, с чем не согласна. так какой тогда у меня цвет глаз? по мне так – green
custom 5330550839540991113100🕊51
☆📼 недавно наткнулась на видео, где люди делились своими нелюбимыми моментами из путешествия: дорога, сбор чемоданов, подготовка документов, поиск отеля и так далее. пришла к чудесному для себя выводу, что люблю странствовать безусловно, и каждый пункт, от только зародившейся мысли до приземления домой, мною горячо обожаем. даже полет в самолете, из-за которого я всегда нервничаю, меня вдохновляет ★彡
custom 5330550839540991113112🕊48
⋆｡𖦹°‧✮ какое желание выдает моя психика после того, как я почувствовала хоть каплю рутины, стабильности и распорядка:
custom 5330550839540991113107🕊47
. ₊˚⊹♡ 🏡 ⊹˚₊ путешествия – это мой единственный способ выбить из головы в ноль рутину и усталость. когда ты заново учишься смотреть на мир, как-будто видишь его впервые, пытаешься увидеть жизнь новыми глазами, тогда и начинаешь проще относиться к проблемам, бонусом возвращаешь себя к себе и ощущению, насколько же жизнь свободна и абсолютна ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ★
custom 533055083954099111375🕊37
★ август ощущается как самый солнечный день в году ᝰ‧₊♡ 1. нервов ноль — канал психолога для тех, кто устал жить на пределе 2. сarpe diem — бесплатный гид по путешествиям в 30+ стран 3. уютный английский с настей — современная лексика, понятные разборы и тёплые рекомендации 4. соня, почему? — эстетика английского без stu(dying) и советы от репетитора с с1-с2 5. женя сексолог — про тело и удовольствие без стыда и…
custom 533055083954099111332🕊16
что может быть страшнее, чем то, что каждый из нас появился на свет, чтобы в итоге вернуться обратно назад? ∙∙∙↝ 🎀 ↜∙∙∙ мб тогда пох кто че подумает и разрешить себе самостоятельно устанавливать нормы своей же жизни? чужое мнение не стоит того, чтобы из-за него просрать собственную счастливую жизнь
custom 5330550839540991113114🕊50
꒰ ♡ 𓏲ּ ꒱ к счастью, я очень люблю: — вечернюю и ночную активность — колу зеро и любого вида сушки с творожным сыром — не привязываться к месту — ставить себе сложнейшие цели и с азартом заполучать их — не откладывать жизнь на завтра — безусловно верить в себя — верить, что все ведет к лучшему
custom 5330550839540991113110🕊51
✦ ‧₊˚ 🪷 ⊹ мне вчера приехала посылка из вб. это не опечатка я долго думала, что такого эксклюзивного заказать, в итоге выбор пал на медовик и абаканскую шишку //彡 это очень нишевая конфета ручной работы с кедровым орехом внутри и весом аж 140г, такая тетя не на каждый день, но попробовать однозначно стоит, мне было очень вкусно ‧₊♡
🕊85custom 533055083954099111364
𐙚 ｡˚ ❤️ ⋆｡ °✩ 🌸 я так давно не красилась на полную, что уже и забыла, как выглядит одно из моих альтер эго. нравится, скучала, но на Бали не в тему вообще ахаха. я уже 5 лет живу в тропиках, поэтому мейк и разные укладки отошли на 10 план ᝰ‧₊♡
custom 533055083954099111383🕊35
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @johannasvis_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“js trip 彡｡ﾟ” (@johannasvis_live), 7,861 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/johannasvis_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.