Photo, posted without a caption
❤29🎃28💯13🤯3

Channel
@jodavszombies
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
643subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001161610139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jodavszombies |
| Created | 29 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jodavszombies |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 643 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 644 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 641 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 642 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 642 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
243 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 36.6% | |
| custom 5372802292552573312 | 38 | 15.6% | |
| 🎃 | 29 | 11.9% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5269371886562719954 | 17 | 7.00% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 6.58% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 6.58% | |
| custom 5399868411947795134 | 8 | 3.29% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.23% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤29🎃28💯13🤯3
Хотел посетить музей турецкого кино в Стамбуле, а там неожиданно открылась временная экспозиция имени Джеймса Кэмерона, выстроенная вокруг его рисунков (охренительных), концепт-артов, плакатов (успел поработать киноплакатистом), раскадровок и пр. Большинство экспликаций — комментарий самого Кэмерона к своим работам. Я и так знал, что Кэмерон гений-фантаст, визионер, исследователь, я бы даже сказал, something of a sci…
❤14custom 537280229255257331211💯3
«Хокум» сцены с конкистадором норм (ну еще кролик), остальное не понял зачем Очень жаль, так как у Д. Маккарти очень понравились предыдущие Caveat (2020) и Oddity (2024) Upd: оказывается, это осел. Но крутой кролик у Маккарти был в Caveat
💔12custom 53998684119477951345custom 53728022925525733123custom 52693718865627199542
Внезапно осознал, что логотип Warner Bros. Pictures 1972-1984 гг. за авторством Сола Баса (и использовавшийся недавно в «Джокере» Т. Филлипса как ностальгическое означающее) кое-что напоминает… UPD: абсолют синема и точка
😁20custom 526937188656271995412custom 53728022925525733129❤6
случайная шутка зашла слишком далеко
❤11😁7🎃1💔1custom 53728022925525733121
Ну что, теперь по новинкам. И «Драма» и «Предчувствие» в общем-то вращаются вокруг одной и той же ситуации — матримониальной тревоги. Откуда она проистекает? Человек задает себе вопрос: а та/тот ли это самая/самый? И этот вопрос задают себе те, кто в «тех самых» не верит. Или его задают все же те, кто немножко, но верит в «родственные души»? Но что это значит? Как и в ситуации «контракта», лишь предъявление требовани…
❤19custom 53728022925525733129💔3custom 53998684119477951343
Интересно, что целый ряд нынешних значимых антиромкомов и около того по всей видимости вдруг решили пересмотреть социологический трюизм, что концепт «отношений» заменил идею «брака». Причем это размышление о, казалось бы, архаичной форме любовного союза, сопровождается и яркими медийными феноменами — поведение Зендеи вызывает большее одобрения, чем эпатажные высказывания Марго Робби. В первую очередь на ум приходят п…
❤10custom 53728022925525733125custom 52693718865627199543
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @jodavszombies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Йода против зомби” (@jodavszombies), 643 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jodavszombies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.